Biologic response of immediately versus delayed loaded implants supporting ill-fitting prostheses: An animal study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 150-158

  Duyck, Joke ^a   Vrielinck, Luc ^b   Lambrichts, Ivo ^c   Abe, Yasuhiko ^d   Schepers, Serge ^b   Politis, Constantin ^b   Naert, Ignace ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Animal; Bone histology; Immediate implant loading; Prosthesis misfit

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644447305     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00059.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3:81-100.
2. Gapski R, Wang H-L, Mascarenha P, Lang NP. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:515-527.
3. Brånemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, et al. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1:2-16.
4. Engstrand P, Nannmark U, Martensson L, Galeus I, Brånemark PI. Brånemark Novum: prosthodontic and dental laboratory procedure for fabrication of a fixed prosthesis on the day of surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14:303-309.
5. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:663-670.
6. Ganz SD. Use of stereolithographic models as diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants. Pract Proc Aesthet Dent 2003; 15:763-771.
7. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading in the maxilla using flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations: a retrospective 3-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):29-36.
8. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:599-604.
9. Wagner A, Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, et al. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in patients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:340-348.
10. Muacevic A, Uhl E, Steiger HJ, Reulen HJ. Accuracy and clinical applicability of a passive marker based frameless neuronavigation system. J Clin Neurosci 2000; 7:414-418.
11. Poggi S, Pallotta S, Russo S, Gallina P, Torresin A, Bucciolini M. Neuronavigation accuracy dependence on CT and MR imaging parameters: a phantom-based study. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48:2199-2216.
12. Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, Pauwels M, Naert I. Image-based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32:7-14.
13. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003; 82:232-237.
14. Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the micro gap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol 2003; 74:346-352.
15. Gomez-Roman G. Influence of flap design on peri-implant interproximal crestal bone loss around single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:61-67.
16. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:500-509.
17. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:620-625.
18. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and framework deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:272-280.
19. Duyck J, Rønold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on the marginal bone behaviour around implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:207-218.
20. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, De Cooman M, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Naert I. Preload on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28:226-233.
21. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:552-558.
22. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983; 62:155-159.
23. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:74-78.
24. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:169-178.