The role of expert networks in reducing regime conflict: Contrasting cases in the management of plant genetic resources

Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 171-198

  Jungcurt, Stefan ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894750850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2006. Nesting, Overlap and Parallelism: Governance Schemes for International Production Standards. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
2. Andersen, Regine. 2008. Governing Agrobiodiversity: Plant Genetics and Developing Countries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
3. Berthaud, Julien. 1997. Strategies for Conservation of Genetic Resources in Relation with Their Utilization. Euphytica 96 (1): 1 - 12.
4. Bragdon, Susan, 2004. International Law of Relevance to Plant Genetic Resources: A Practical Review for Scientists and Other Professionals Working with Plant Genetic Resources. Issues in Genetic Resources No. 10. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
5. Brush, Stephen B. 2000. The Issues of in situ Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources. In Genes in the Field: On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, ed. Stephen B. Brush, 3 - 29. New York: Lewis.
6. Brush, Stephen B. 2005. Protecting Traditional Agricultural Knowledge. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 17: 59 - 110.
7. CBD. 2002. Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefi ts Arising out of their Utilization. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
8. Chatham House,. 2006. Disclosure Requirements in Patent Applications: The State of the Art of National and Regional Measures. Report Produced for the European Commission under Its Sixth Framework Programme as Part of the Project, " Impacts of the IPR Rules on Sustainable Development " (IPDEV). London: Chatham House, Energy, Environment and Development Programme.
9. Cooper, David, Jan Engles, and Emile Frison. 1994. A Multilateral System for Plant Genetic Resources: Imperatives, Achievements and Challenges. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
10. Correa, Carlos. 2003. Establishing a Disclosure of Origin Obligation in the TRIPS Agreement. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Offi ce.
11. de Carvalho, Nuno Pires. 2005. From the Shaman ' s Hut to the Patent Offi ce: In Search of a TRIPS-Consistent Requirement to Disclose the Origin of Genetic Resources and Prior Informed Consent. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 17: 111 - 186.
12. Dutfi eld, Graham. 1999. Sharing the Benefi ts of Biodiversity: Access Regimes and Intellectual Property Rights. Science, Technology and Development, Discussion Paper No. 6. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
13. Falcon, Walter P., and Cary Fowler. 2002. Carving up the Commons: Emergence of a New International Regime for Germplasm Development and Transfer. Food Policy 27 (3): 197 - 222.
14. FAO. 1989a. Agreed Interpretation of the International Undertaking. Twentyfi fth Session of the FAO Conference. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
15. FAO. 1989b. Farmers ' Rights. Twenty-fi fth Session of the FAO Conference. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
16. FAO. 1991. Resolution 3/91. Twenty-sixth Session of the FAO Conference. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
17. FAO. 2006. Standard Material Transfer Agreement. First Session of the ITPGR Governing Body. Madrid: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
18. FAO. 2007. Experience of the Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) with the Implementation of the Agreements with the Governing Body, with Particular Reference to the Standard Material Transfer Agreement. Second Session of the ITPGR Governing Body. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
19. Fowler, Cary. 2000. Establishing the Scope of a Multilateral System for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Implications of Crop Exclusions. Biopolicy Journal 3 (2): 1 - 14.
20. Fowler, Cary. 2004. Accessing Genetic Resources: International Law Establishes Multilateral System. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51 (6): 609 - 620.
21. Grajal, Alejandro. 1999. Biodiversity and the Nation State: Regulating Access to Genetic Resources Limits Biodiversity Research in Developing Countries. Conservation Biology 13 (1): 6 - 10.
22. Haas, Peter M. 1989. Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization 43 (3): 377 - 403.
23. Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1 - 35.
24. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Helfer, Laurence R. 2002. Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties: An Overview with Options for National Governments. FAO Legal Papers Online. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
26. Hess, Charlotte, and Elinor Ostrom. 2003. Ideas, Artifacts and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (1 - 2): 111 - 145.
27. ICTSD. 2006. Trade BioRes 6 (19). Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
28. ICTSD. 2008. Bridges Weekly Trade Digest 12 (27). Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
29. IISD. 2001. Sixth Extraordinary Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 24 June - 2 July 2001. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (191). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
30. IISD. 2005. Summary of the Third Meeting of the Working Group on Access and Benefi t-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 14 - 18 February 2005. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (311). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
31. IISD. 2006a. Summary of the Fourth Meeting of the Working Group on Access and Benefi t-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 30 January - 3 February 2006. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (344). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
32. IISD. 2006b. Summary of the First Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 12 - 16 June 2006. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (269). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
33. IISD. 2007. Summary of the Fifth Meeting of the Working Group on Access and Benefi t Sharing and the Fifth Meeting of the Working Group on Article 8(j) and related Provisions: 8 - 19 October 2007. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (382). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
34. IISD. 2008. Summary of the Ninth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: 19 - 30 May 2008. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (452). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
35. IISD. 2010. Summary of the Ninth Meeting of the Working Group on Access and Benefi t-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 22 - 28 March 2010. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9 (503). Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
36. ISF. 2005. Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Use and Conservation. Santiago: International Seed Federation.
37. ISF. 2007. Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Santiago: International Seed Federation.
38. IUCN. 2005. Analysis of Claims of Unauthorised Access and Misappropriation of Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge: Research Report prepared for the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ottawa: World Conservation Union, IUCN-Canada.
39. Jinnah, Sikina, and Stefan Jungcurt. 2009. Could Access Requirements Stifl e Your Research? Science 323 (5913): 464 - 465.
40. Jungcurt, Stefan. 2008. Institutional Interplay in International Environmental Governance: Policy Interdependence and Strategic Interaction in the Regime Complex on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Aachen: Shaker.
41. MA. 2005. Ecosystems & Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute. Petit, Michel, Cary Fowler, Wanda Collins, Carlos Correa, and Carl-Gustaf
42. Thornstr ö m. 2001. Why Governments Can ' t Make Policy: The Case of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Arena. Lima: International Potato Center.
43. Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277 - 309.
44. Rosendal, Kristin G. 2006. The Convention on Biological Diversity: Tension with the WTO TRIPS Agreement over Access to Genetic Resources and the Sharing of Benefi ts. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Confl ict among International and EU Policies, ed. Sebastian Oberth ü r and Thomas Gehring, 79 - 102. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
45. Sauv é, Rapha ë l, and Jamie Watts. 2003. An Analysis of IPGRI ' s Infl uence on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Agricultural Systems 78 (2): 307 - 327.
46. Tsioumani, Elsa. 2005. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Legal and Policy Questions from Adoption to Implementation. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15: 119 - 144.
47. UN. 2002. Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August - 4 September 2002. New York: UN.
48. WTO. 2001. Doha Ministerial Declaration. Ministerial Conference, Fourth Session, Doha, 9 - 14 November 2001. Doha: World Trade Organization.
49. WTO. 2004. The Relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Checklist of Issues. Submission from Brazil, Cuba, Ecuador, India, Peru, Thailand and Venezuela. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
50. Young, Oran R. 1996. Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives. Global Governance 2 (1): 1 - 24.