An analysis of IPGRI's influence on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 307-327

  Sauvé, Raphaël ^a   Watts, Jamie ^b  

^a INDUSTRY CANADA   (Canada)

^b International Plant Genetic Resources Institute Maccarese   (Italy)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Impact assessment; International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Policy interventions

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; GENETIC RESOURCE; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; NEGOTIATION PROCESS;

EID: 0142091355     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00131-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arts, B., 1998. The Political Influence of Global NGOs: Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions. International Books, Utrecht.
2. Arts, B., Verschuren, P., 1999. Assessing political influence in complex decision-making: an instrument based on triangulation. International Political Science Review 20 (4), 411-424, 412-413.
3. CGIAR, 2002. Overview of the Activities and Achievements of the CGIAR Genetic Resources Policy Committee, 1995-2002. Internal Report. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Washington, DC.
4. Cox, R., Jacobson, H., 1973. The Anatomy of Influence. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
5. Denzin, N.K., 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Esquinas-Azcazar, J., 2001. Making Plant Genetic Resources Beneficial and Accessible for All. http:// www.fao.org/news/2001/011005-e.htm.
7. FAO, 2001. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Adopted by the Thirty-first Session of the FAO Conference. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
8. FAO, 2002. Web site for the FAO Commission on Genetic Resource for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http:// www.fao.org/ag/cgrfa/iu.htm.
9. Fowler, C., 2000. Establishing the scope of a multilateral system for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: implications of crop exclusions. Biopolicy Journal, Volume 3, Paper 2 (PY00002) November 24th 2000, p. 1. Online Journal- URL: http://bioline.bdt.org.br/py.
10. George, A., 1980. Presidential Decision Making in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Westview Press, Boulder.
11. Haas, P.M., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, Vol. 46, Issue 1, Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination, Winter 1992, pp. 1-35, 2.
12. Haas P. M., Adler, E., 1992. Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization, Vol. 46, Issue 1, Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination, Winter 1992, pp. 367-390.
13. Haggard, S., Simmons, B. A., 1987. Theories of international regimes. International Organization, Vol. 41, Issue 3, Summer 1987, pp. 491-517.
14. Hawtin, G., Reeves, T., 1997. Intellectual Property Rights and Access to Genetic Resources in the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Paper presented to the workshop Intellectual Property Rights III - Global Genetic Resources: Access and Property Rights, 4-6 June 1997, Washington, DC.
15. Huberts, L., 1988. De Politieke Invloed van Protest en Pressie. Besluitvormingsprocessen over Rijkswegen. DSWO Press, Leiden.
16. Huberts, L., 1994. Intensieve procesanalyse. in Methoden van invloedsanalyse, Boom, Meppel.
17. IPGRI, 2002. Official IPGRI Web Site - About IPGRI - http://www.ipgri.org. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
18. IPGRI, 1999. Diversity for Development. The New Strategy of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. IPGRI, Rome, Italy.
19. IPGRI, 1994. Board Policies and Procedures Manual. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
20. Jonsson, C., Kronsell, Y., Soderholm, P., 1995. Prelude to Regimes: International Organizations and Agenda Setting. Paper to the Second Pan-European Conference in International Relations, Paris, 1995; in Arts, Bas, op. cit., note 11, p. 66.
21. Keely, J. F., 1990. Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of International Regimes. International Organization, Vol. 44, Issue 1, Winter 1990, pp. 83-105.
22. Keohane, R. O., 1982. The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization, Vol. 36, Issue 2, Spring 1982, pp. 325-355, 345-346.
23. Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. Jr., 1987. Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization, Vol. 41, Issue 4, Autumn 1987, pp. 725-753, 741.
24. Krasner, S.D., 1982. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, Vol. 36, Issue 2, Spring 1982, pp. 185-206.
25. Moravcsik, A., 1999. A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation. International Organization, Vol. 53, Issue 2, Spring 1999, pp. 267-306, 269.
26. Morrow, J. D., 1994. Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information. International Organization, Vol. 48, Issue 3, Summer 1994, pp. 387-423.
27. Patton, M.Q., 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, second ed.. Sage Publications, London.
28. Risse-Kappen, T. (Ed.), 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back in. Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (in Arts, Bas, op. cit., note 11, p. 67).
29. Sebenius, J. K., 1992. Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities. International Organization, vol. 46, Issue 1, Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination, Winter 1992, pp. 323-365.
30. Young, O., 1991. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: on the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization, Vol. 45, Issue 3, Summer 1991, pp. 281-308, 285.