Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 251-257

  Allen, Charlotte L ^a   Hooper, Gary J ^b   Oram, Byron J ^a   Wells, J Elizabeth ^b  

^a CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84894554666     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1996-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wasiliewski RC et al (1995) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 318:176-181
2. Moreland JR (1988) Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 266:49-64
3. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:77-79
4. Ritter MA et al (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153-156
5. Berend ME et al (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26-34
6. Jeffery RS et al (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709-714
7. Rienmüller A, Guggi T, Gruber G, Preiss S, Drobny T (2012) The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(10):2067-2072
8. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD (2009) Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:560-569
9. Sparman M et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830-835
10. Stulberg SD et al (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(Suppl 2):90-98
11. Chin PL et al (2005) Randomised control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20:618-626
12. Bathis H et al (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:682-687
13. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:152-159
14. Chauhan S, Scott R, Breidahl W, Beaver R (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B:372-377
15. Zhang G, Chen J, Chai W, Liu M, Wang Y (2011) Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures - a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(13):1190-1196
16. Mason J, Fehring T, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22(8):1097-1106
17. Yi-Jan Weng MD, Robert Wen-Wei Hsu MD, Wei-Hsiu Hsu MD (2009) Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(5):668-673
18. Kim Y, Kim J, Choi Y, Kwon O (2009) Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):14-19
19. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(12):2143-2149
20. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2012) Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2017-2024
21. Cinotti G, Ripani F, Sessa P, Giannicola G (2012) Combining different rotational alignment axes with navigation may reduce the need for lateral retinacular release in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(8):1595-1600
22. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87(1):18-28
23. Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T (2002) Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee 9:275-279
24. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopaedics 13:861-868
25. Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Othop Res 22:1248-1253
26. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Baena FM R y, Barret ARW, Cobb JP (2006) Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement - the imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:1513-1518
27. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (The Perth CT protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B:818-823
28. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomised study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236-243
29. Talbot S, Hooper G, Stokes A, Zordan R (2010) Use of a new high-activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(2):268-273
30. Armitage P, Berry G, Mathews J (2002) Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford, Blackwell
31. Tigani D, Masetti G, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Fosco M (2012) Computer-assisted surgery as indication of choice: total knee arthroplasty in case of retained hardware or extra-articular deformity. Int Orthop 36(7):1379-1385
32. Ritter M, Davis K, Davis P, Farris A, Malinzak R, Berend M, Meding J (2013) Preoperative malalignment increases risk of failure after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(2):126-131