Identification of suppressors of mbk-2/DYRK by whole-genome sequencing

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 231-241

  Wang, Yuemeng ^a   Wang, Jennifer T ^a   Rasoloson, Dominique ^a   Stitzel, Michael L ^a,c   O'Connell, Kevin F ^b   Smith, Harold E ^b   Seydoux, Geraldine ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^c JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

C. elegans; DYRK kinase; MBK 2; Single nucleotide polymorphism mapping; Suppressors; Whole genome sequencing

Indexed keywords

AMINOPHOSPHOLIPID; PROTEIN; PROTEIN MBK 2; RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CHROMOSOME; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE ISOLATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; HERMAPHRODITE; MICROBIAL GENOME; MISSENSE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SUPPRESSOR GENE; WILD TYPE;

C. ELEGANS; DYRK KINASE; MBK-2; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM MAPPING; SUPPRESSORS; WHOLE-GENOME SEQUENCING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME, HELMINTH; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RNA INTERFERENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84894540525     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.009126     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beers, M., and K. Kemphues, 2006 Depletion of the co-chaperone CDC-37 reveals two modes of PAR-6 cortical association in C. elegans embryos. Development 133: 3745-3754.
2. Brenner, S., 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71-94.
3. Budirahardja, Y., and P. Gonczy, 2008 PLK-1 asymmetry contributes to asynchronous cell division of C. elegans embryos. Development 135: 1303-1313.
4. Chen, C., L. A. Fenk, and M. de Bono, 2013 Efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans by CRISPR-targeted homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: e193.
5. Cheng, K. C., R. Klancer, A. Singson, and G. Seydoux, 2009 Regulation of MBK-2/DYRK by CDK-1 and the pseudophosphatases EGG-4 and EGG-5 during the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Cell 139: 560-572.
6. Chiu, H., H. T. Schwartz, I. Antoshechkin, and P. W. Sternberg, 2013 Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas. Genetics 195: 1167-1171.
7. Davis, E. S., L. Wille, B. A. Chestnut, P. L. Sadler, D. C. Shakes et al., 2002 Multiple subunits of the Caenorhabditis elegans anaphase-promoting complex are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I. Genetics 160: 805-813.
8. Dickinson, D. J., J. D. Ward, D. J. Reiner, and B. Goldstein, 2013 Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat. Methods 10: 1028-1034.
9. Doitsidou, M., R. J. Poole, S. Sarin, H. Bigelow, and O. Hobert, 2010 C. elegans mutant identification with a one-step whole-genomesequencing and SNP mapping strategy. PLoS ONE 5: e15435.
10. Fievet, B. T., J. Rodriguez, S. Naganathan, C. Lee, E. Zeiser, et al., 2012 Systematic genetic interaction screens uncover cell polarity regulators and functional redundancy. Nat. Cell Biol. 15: 103-112.
11. Fraser, A. G., R. S. Kamath, P. Zipperien, M. Martinez-Campos, M. Sohrmann et al., 2000 Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 408: 320-330.
12. Friedland, A. E., Y. B. Tzur, K. M. Esvelt, M. P. Colaiacovo, G. M. Church et al., 2013 Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Methods 10: 741-743.
13. Gallo, C. M., J. T. Wang, F. Motegi and G. Seydoux, 2010 Cytoplasmic partitioning of P granule components is not required to specify the germline in C. elegans. Science 330: 1685-1689.
14. Golden, A., P. L. Sadler, M. R. Wallenfang, J. M. Schumacher, D. R. Hamill et al., 2000 Metaphase to anaphase (mat) transition-defective mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 151: 1469-1482.
15. Hodgkin, J., 2005 Genetic suppression. WormBook 1-13.
16. Hodgkin, J., and T. Doniach, 1997 Natural variation and copulatory plug formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 146: 149-164.
17. Holway, A. H., C. Hung, and W. M. Michael, 2005 Systematic, RNAinterference-mediated identification of mus-101 modifier genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 169: 1451-1460.
18. Homer, N., B. Merriman, and S. F. Nelson, 2009 BFAST: an alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing. PLoS ONE 4: e7767.
19. Katic, I., and H. Grosshans, 2013 Targeted heritable mutation and gene conversion by Cas9-CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 195: 1173-1176.
20. Kitagawa, R., E. Law, L. Tang, and A. M. Rose, 2002 The Cdc20 homolog, FZY-1, and its interacting protein, IFY-1, are required for proper chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 12: 2118-2123.
21. Labed, S. A., S. Omi, M. Gut, J. J. Ewbank, and N. Pujol, 2012 The pseudokinase NIPI-4 is a novel regulator of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. PLoS ONE 7: e33887.
22. Li, H., B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker, T. Fennell, J. Ruan et al., 2009 The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
23. Lyssenko, N. N., Y. Miteva, S. Gilroy, W. Hanna-Rose, and R. A. Schlegel, 2008 An unexpectedly high degree of specialization and a widespread involvement in sterol metabolism among the C. elegans putative aminophospholipid translocases. BMC Dev. Biol. 8: 96.
24. Minevich, G., D. S. Park, D. Blankenberg, R. J. Poole, and O. Hobert, 2012 CloudMap: a cloud-based pipeline for analysis of mutant genome sequences. Genetics 192: 1249-1269.
25. Nishi, Y., and R. Lin, 2005 DYRK2 and GSK-3 phosphorylate and promote the timely degradation of OMA-1, a key regulator of the oocyte-to-embryo transition in C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 288: 139-149.
26. Pellettieri, J., V. Reinke, S. K. Kim, and G. Seydoux, 2003 Coordinate activation of maternal protein degradation during the egg-to-embryo transition in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 5: 451-462.
27. Quintin, S., P. E. Mains, A. Zinke, and A. A. Hyman, 2003 The mbk-2 kinase is required for inactivation of MEI-1/katanin in the one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. EMBO Rep. 4: 1175-1181.
28. Rivers, D. M., S. Moreno, M. Abraham, and J. Ahringer, 2008 PAR proteins direct asymmetry of the cell cycle regulators Polo-like kinase and Cdc25. J. Cell Biol. 180: 877-885.
29. Robertson, S., and R. Lin, 2013 The oocyte-to-embryo transition. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 757: 351-372.
30. Seidel, H. S., M. V. Rockman, and L. Kruglyak, 2008 Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319: 589-594.
31. Seidel, H. S., M. Ailion, J. Li, A. van Oudenaarden, M. V. Rockman et al., 2011 A novel sperm-delivered toxin causes late-stage embryo lethality and transmission ratio distortion in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 9: e1001115.
32. Soundararajan, M., A. K. Roos, P. Savitsky, P. Filippakopoulos, A. N. Kettenbach et al., 2013 Structures of Down syndrome kinases, DYRKs, reveal mechanisms of kinase activation and substrate recognition. Structure 21: 986-996.
33. Srayko, M., D. W. Buster, O. A. Bazirgan, F. J. McNally, and P. E. Mains, 2000 MEI-1/MEI-2 katanin-like microtubule severing activity is required for Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genes Dev. 14: 1072-1084.
34. Stein, K. K., J. E. Nesmith, B. D. Ross, and A. Golden, 2010 Functional redundancy of paralogs of an anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome subunit in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 186: 1285-1293.
35. Stitzel, M. L., J. Pellettieri, and G. Seydoux, 2006 The C. elegans DYRK kinase MBK-2 marks oocyte proteins for degradation in response to meiotic maturation. Curr. Biol. 16: 56-62.
36. Stitzel, M. L., K. C. Cheng, and G. Seydoux, 2007 Regulation of MBK-2/ Dyrk kinase by dynamic cortical anchoring during the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Curr Biol. 17: 1545-1554.
37. Strome, S., 2005 Specification of the germ line. WormBook 1-10.
38. Strome, S., and W. B. Wood, 1983 Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 35: 15-25.
39. Taipale, M., I. Krykbaeva, M. Koeva, C. Kayatekin, K. D. Westover et al., 2012 Quantitative analysis of HSP90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition. Cell 150: 987-1001.
40. Timmons, L., and A. Fire, 1998 Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature 395: 854.
41. Tzur, Y. B., A. E. Friedland, S. Nadarajan, G. M. Church, J. A. Calarco et al., 2013 Heritable custom genomic modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Genetics 195: 1181-1185.
42. Waaijers, S., V. Portegijs, J. Kerver, B. B. Lemmens, M. Tijsterman et al., 2013 CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 195: 1187-1191.
43. Wang, K., M. Li, and H. Hakonarson, 2010 ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38: e164.
44. Wicks, S. R., C. J. de Vries, H. G. van Luenen, and R. H. Plasterk, 2000 CHE-3, a cytosolic dynein heavy chain, is required for sensory cilia structure and function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 221: 295-307.