Simultaneous aerodynamic and structural design optimization (SASDO) for a 3-D wing

15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Gumbert, Clyde R ^a   Hout, Gene J W ^b   Newman, Perry A ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Old Dominion University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894476689     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Newman, P. A., Hou, G. J.-W., and Taylor, III A. C., Observations Regarding Use of Advanced CFD Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis, and Design Codes in MDO, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, edited by N. M. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, SIAM Proceedings Series, Philadelphia, 1997, pp. 263-279, also ICASE Report 96-16, NASA CR 198293, (available electronically at www.icase.edu).
2. Newman, III J. C., Taylor, III A. C., Barnwell, R. W., Newman, P. A., and Hou, G. J.-W., Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1999, pp. 87-96.
3. Alexandrov, N. M. and Hussaini, M. Y., editors, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, SIAM Proceedings Series, Philadelphia, 1997.
4. Ghattas, O. and Orozco, C. E., A Parallel Reduced Hessian SQP Method for Shape Optimization, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, edited by N. M. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, SIAM Proceedings Series, Philadelphia, 1997, pp. 133-152.
5. Hou, G. J.-W., Taylor, III A. C., Mani, S. V., and Newman, P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization, Abstracts from 2nd U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics, Aug. 1993, pp. 130.
6. Mani, S. V., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization, Master's thesis, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, Dec. 1993.
7. Hou, G. J.-W., Korivi, V. M., Taylor, III A. C., Maroju, V., and Newman, P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) of a Turbulent Transonic Airfoil Using a Navier-Stokes Code With Automatic Differentiation (ADIFOR), Proceedings of the Computational Aerosciences Workshop 95, edited by W. J. Feiereisen and A. K.Lacer, NASA CD CP-20010, Jan. 1996, pp. 82-85.
8. th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, June 1999, pp. 402-418, also AIAA Paper 99-3296.
9. Gumbert, C. R., Hou, G. J.-W., and Newman, P. A., Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) of a 3-D Flexible Wing, AIAA Paper 2001-1107, Jan. 2001.
10. Haftka, R. T., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., and Padula, S. L., On Options for Interdisciplinary Analysis and Design Optimization, Structural Optimization, Vol. 4, 1992, pp. 65-74.
11. Shubin, G. R., Application of Alternative Multidisciplinary Optimization Formulations to a Model Problem for Static Aeroelasticity, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 118, No. 1, 1995, pp. 73-85.
12. Arian, E., Analysis of the Hessian for Aeroelastic Optimization, ICASE Report 95-84, Dec. 1995.
13. Walsh, J. L., Townsend, J. C., Salas, A. O., Samareh, J. A., Mukhopadhyay, V., and Barthelemy, J. F., Multidisciplinary High-Fidelity Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles, Part 1: Formulation, AIAA Paper 2000-0418, Jan. 2000.
14. Walsh, J. L., Weston, R. P., Samareh, J. A., Mason, B. H., Green, L. L., and Biedron, R. T., Multidisciplinary High- Fidelity Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles, Part 2: Preliminary Results, AIAA Paper 2000-0419, Jan. 2000.
15. Reuther, J. J., Alonso, J. J., Martins, J. R., and Smith, S. C., A Coupled Aero-Structural Optimization Method for Complete Aircraft Configurations, AIAA Paper 99-0187, Jan. 1999.
16. Kapania, R. K., Eldred, L. B., and Barthelemy, J. -F. M., Sensitivity Analysis of a Wing Aeroelastic Response, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1993, pp. 496-504, also AIAA Paper 91-1103.
17. Arslan, A. E. and Carlson, L. A., Integrated Determination of Sensitivity Derivatives for an Aeroelastic Transonic Wing, Proceedings for the 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach, FL, Sept. 1994, pp. 1286-1300, also AIAA Paper 94-4400 CP.
18. Giunta, A. A. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Progress Toward Using {Sensitivity Derivatives in a High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis of a Supersonic Transport, Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, Sept. 1998, pp. 441-453, also AIAA Paper 98-4763 CP.
19. Giunta, A. A., Sensitivity Analysis for Coupled Aero- Structural Systems, NASA TM-1999-209367, Aug. 1999.
20. Newman, III J. C., Whitfield, D. L., and Anderson, K. W., A Step-Size Independent Approach for Multidisciplinary Sensitivity Analysis and Design Optimization, Proceedings of the 17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, June 1999, pp. 12-22, also AIAA Paper 99-3101.
21. Ghattas, O. and Li, X., Domain Decomposition Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Aeroelastic Problem, International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 11, 1998, pp. 113-130.
22. Møller, H. and Lund, E., Shape Sensitivity Analysis of Strongly Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems, Proceedings of 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, Sept. 2000, also AIAA Paper 2000-4823.
23. Maute, K., Nikbay, M., and Farhat, C., Analytical Based Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems, Proceedings of 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, Sept. 2000, also AIAA Paper 2000-4825.
24. th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, Sept. 2000, also AIAA Paper 2000-4824.
25. Biros, G. and Ghattas, O., Parallel Newton- Krylov Algorithms For PDE-Constrained Optimization, Proceedings of Scientific Computing 99, Portland, OR, 1999.
26. Ghattas, O. and Bark, J.-H., Optimal Control of Twoand Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Flows, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 136, No. 2, 1997, pp. 231-244.
27. Pierce, N. A. and Giles, M. B., Adjoint Recovery of Superconvergent Functionals From PDE Approximations, SIAM Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2000, pp. 247-264.
28. Venditti, D. A. and Darmofal, D. L., Multilevel Error Estimation and Grid Adaptive Strategy for Improving the Accuracy of Integral Outputs, Proceedings of the AIAA 15th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, June 1999, also AIAA Paper 1999-3292.
29. Jameson, A. and Vassberg, J. C., Computational Fluid Dynamics for Aerodynamic Design: Its Current and Future Impact, AIAA Paper 2001-0538, Jan. 2001.
30. Rumsey, C., Biedron, R., and Thomas, J., CFL3D: Its History and Some Recent Applications, NASA TM-112861, May 1997.
31. Sherman, L., Taylor, III A., Green, L., Newman, P., Hou, G., and Korivi, M., First- and Second- Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incre mental Iterative Methods, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 129, No. 2, 1996, pp. 307-336.
32. Bischof, C. H., Carle, A., Corliss, G. F., Griewank, A., and Hovland, P., ADIFOR: Generating Derivative Codes from Fortran Programs, Scientific Programming, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1-29.
33. Bischof, C. and Griewank, A., ADIFOR: A Fortran System for Portable Automatic Differentiation, Proceedings of the 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland, OH, Sept. 1992, pp. 433-441, also AIAA Paper 92-4744 CP.
34. Taylor, III A. C., Oloso, A., and Newman, III J.C., CFL3D.ADII (Version 2.0): An Efficient, Accurate, General- Purpose Code for Flow Shape-Sensitivity Analysis, AIAA Paper 97-2204, June 1997.
35. Smith, R. E., Bloor, M. I. G., Wilson, M. J., and Thomas, A. T., Rapid Airplane Parametric Input Design (RAPID), Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 452-462, also AIAA Paper 95-1687.
36. Jones, W. T. and Samareh-Abolhassani, J., A Grid Generation System for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 474-482, also AIAA Paper 95-1689.
37. Bischof, C., Jones, W. T., Samareh-Abolhassani, J., and Mauer, A., Experiences with the Application of the ADIC Automatic Differentiation Tool to the CSCMDO 3-D Volume Grid Generation Code, AIAA Paper 96-0716, Jan. 1996.
38. Nguyen, D. T., Finite Element Software for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Final Report, Tech. rep., Old Dominion University Research Foundation, Contract NAS1-19858, Task 69, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Nov. 1995.
39. th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, Sept. 1998, pp. 454- 464, also AIAA Paper 98-4764.
40. th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, Sept. 2000, also AIAA Paper 2000-4704.
41. Anon., DOT Users Manual: Version 5.0, Vanderplaats Research &; Development, Inc., Colorado Springs, May 1999.
42. Ta'asan, S., Trends in Aerodynamic Design and Optimization: A Mathematical Viewpoint, Proceedings, Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 961-970, also AIAA Paper 95-0001.