Procedures and claims among US evidence producing organisations: The case of the incredible years programme

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 61-76

  Karlsson, Patrik ^a   Bergmark, Anders ^a   Lundström, Tommy ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Evidence; Evidence producing organisations; Procedures; Variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894462176     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426513X672444     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arney, FM, Bromfield, LM, Lewig, K, Holzer, 2009, Integrating strategies for delivering evidence-informed practice, Evidence & Policy, 5, 2, 179-91
2. Axberg, U, Broberg, AG, 2012, Evaluation of the Incredible Years in Sweden: The transferability of an American parent-training programme to Sweden, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 3, 224-232
3. Bergmark, A, Lundström, T, 2011, Guided or independent? Social workers, central bureaucracy and evidence-based practice, European Journal of Social Work, 14, 3, 323-37
4. Bowen, S, Zwi, AB, Sainsbury, P, Whitehead, M, 2009, Killer facts, politics and other influences: What evidence triggered early childhood intervention policies in Australia?, Evidence & Policy, 5, 1, 5-32
5. Davies, H, Nutley, S, Walter, I, 2008, Why 'knowledge transfer' is misconceived for applied social research, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 3, 188-90 (Pubitemid 352029763)
6. Federal Register, 2006, 71, 126, 37590-37591
7. Federal Register, 2011, 76, 180, 57742-57744
8. Gambrill, E, 2006, Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead, Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 3, 338-57 (Pubitemid 43529065)
9. Gandhi, AG, Murphy-Graham, E, Petrosino, A, Schwarz-Chrismer, S, Weiss, C, 2007, The devil is in the details: Examining the evidence for 'proven' school-based drug abuse prevention programs, Evaluation Review, 31, 1, 43-74
10. Gorman, DM, 1995, On the difference between statistical and practical significance in school-based drug abuse prevention, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 2, 3, 275-83
11. Gorman, DM, 2002, The 'science' of drug and alcohol prevention: The case of the randomised trial of the Life Skills Training (LST) program, International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 1, 21-6 (Pubitemid 34606827)
12. Gorman, DM, 2005, Drug and violence prevention: Rediscovering the critical rational dimension of evaluation research, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 1, 39-62 (Pubitemid 41310188)
13. Gorman, DM, Conde, E, Huber, JC, 2007, The creation of evidence in 'evidencebased' drug prevention: A critique of the Strengthening Families Program plus Life Skills Training evaluation, Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 585-93
14. Gorman, DM, Huber, JC, 2009, The social construction of 'evidence-based' drug prevention programmes: A reanalysis of data from the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE), Program, Evaluation Review 33, 4, 396-414
15. Hansen, HF, Rieper, O, 2009, The evidence-movement: The development and consequences of methodologies in review practices, Evaluation, 15, 2, 141-63
16. Hansen, HF, Rieper, O, 2011, Evidenspolitik: Fallet Danmark [Evidence policy: The case of Denmark], in Bohlin, I Sager, M (eds), Evidensens många ansikten [The many faces of evidence], Lund: Arkiv Förlag, 185-205
17. Higgins, JPT, Green, S (eds), 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 510, The Cochrane Collaboration, www.cochrane-handbook.org
18. Littell, J, 2008, Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidencebased practices, Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 11, 1299-1317
19. Littell, J, Popa, M, Forsythe, B, 2005, Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10-17, Campbell Systematic reviews, 2005:1
20. Mykhalovskiy, E, Weir, L, 2004, The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science, Social Science and Medicine, 59, 5, 1059-69 (Pubitemid 38737450)
21. Petrosino, A, 2003, Standards for evidence and evidence for standards: The case of school-based drug prevention, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 1, 180-207 (Pubitemid 36532931)
22. Petticrew, M, Roberts, H, 2003, Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 7, 527-9 (Pubitemid 36782972)
23. Piquero, A, Farrington, D, Jennings, W, Tremblay, R, Piquero, A, Welsh, B, 2008, Effects of early family/parent training programmes on antisocial behavior and delinquency, Campbell Review, 2, 8
24. Sampson, M, McGovan, J, Tetzlaff, J, Cogo, E, Moher, D, 2008, No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 8, 748-54
25. SBU (Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering [Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment]), 2010, Program för att förebygga psykisk ohälsa bland barn: En systematisk litteraturöversikt [Programmes for preventing psychological ill-health among children: A systematic literature review] Stockholm: SBU
26. Scott, S, Spender, Q, Doolan, M, Jacobs, B, Aspland, H, 2001, Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practice, British Medical Journal, 323, 194
27. Smith, KE, Joyce, KE, 2012, Capturing complex realities: Understanding efforts to achieve evidence-based policy and practice in public health, Evidence & Policy, 8, 1, 57-78
28. Timmermans, S, Angell, A, 2001, Evidence-based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 4, 342-59 (Pubitemid 33597749)
29. Timmermans, S, Almeling R, 2009, Objectification, standardisation, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment, Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1, 21-7
30. Timmermans, S, Mauck, A, 2005, The promise and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine, Health Affairs, 24, 1, 18-28
31. Upshur, R, Tracy, S, 2004, Legitimacy, authority, and hierarchy: Critical challenges for evidence-based medicine, Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 3, 197-204
32. Wampold, B, 2001, The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods and findings, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
33. Webster-Stratton, C, 2006, The incredible years: A trouble-shooting guide for parents of children aged 2-8 years, Seattle: Incredible Years
34. Webster-Stratton, C, Herman, K, 2010, Disseminating Incredible Years Series earlyintervention programmes: Integrating and sustaining services between school and home, Psychology in the Schools, 47, 1, 36-54
35. WWC (What Works Clearinghouse), 2010, WWC evidence review protocol for early childhood education for children with disabilities, Version 2.0, US Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences
36. WWC, 2011a, Children classified as having an emotional disturbance intervention report: The Incredible Years, US Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences
37. WWC, 2011b, Procedures and standards handbook, Version 2.1, US Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences
38. WWC, 2011c, WWC evidence review protocol: Interventions for children classified as having an emotional disturbance, Version 2.0, US Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences
39. WWC, 2012, Early childhood education interventions for children with disabilities intervention report: The Incredible Years, US Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences
40. Zwi, M, Jones, H, Thorgaard, C, York, A, Dennis, J, 2012, Parent training interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Campbell Review, 8, 2