Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 536-548

  Tolcher, Mary C ^a   Johnson, Rebecca L ^a   El Nashar, Sherif A ^a   West, Colin P ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; CANADA; CESAREAN SECTION; EMERGENCIES; EUROPE; FEMALE; FETAL BLOOD; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ODDS RATIO; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS; UMBILICAL ARTERIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84894440287     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000132     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Lagrew DC, Bush MC, McKeown AM, Lagrew NG. Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1638-43.
2. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000;93:346-50.
3. Dupuis O, Sayegh I, Decullier E, Dupont C, Clément HJ, Berland M, et al. Red, orange and green Caesarean sections: a new communication tool for on-call obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;140:206-11.
4. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists Committee on Professional Standards. Standards for obstetric-gynecologic services. 7th ed. Washington, DC; 1989.
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean section guideline. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011.
6. American Academy of Pediatrics ACoOaG. Intrapartum and postpartum care of women. Guidelines for perinatal care. Washington (DC): AAP; 2012. p. 192.
7. Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Gilbert S, Hauth JC, Landon MB, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:6-11.
8. Chauhan SP, Roach H, Naef RW II, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference J Reprod Med 1997;42:347-52.
9. Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target BJOG 2002;109:505-8.
10. Hillemanns P, Hepp H, Rebhan H, Knitza R. Emergency cesarean section-organization and decision-delivery time [Article in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1996;56:423-30.
11. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG 2002;109:498-504.
12. Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable Observational case series. BMJ 2001;322: 1330-3.
13. Homer CS, Catling-Paull C. Safe timing for an urgent Caesarean section: what is the evidence to guide policy Aust Health Rev 2012;36:277-81.
14. Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012.
15. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283:2008-12.
16. Amankwah Y, Caughey S, Walker M. A prospective study of the efficiency of the "code 333" process at the Ottawa hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011;33:244-51.
17. de Regt RH, Marks K, Joseph DL, Malmgren JA. Time from decision to incision for cesarean deliveries at a community hospital. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:625-9.
18. Mooney SE, Ogrinc G, Steadman W. Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:60-6.
19. Chauleur C, Collet F, Furtos C, Nourrissat A, Seffert P, Chauvin F. Identification of factors influencing the decisionto-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009;68:248-54.
20. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603-5.
21. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.
22. Berlit S, Welzel G, Tuschy B, Nickol J, Hornemann A, Sütterlin M, et al. Emergency caesarean section: risk factors for adverse neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:901-5.
23. Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, Loughney AD. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy 2011;2011:640379.
24. Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, Dutton S, Kurinczuk JJ, MacKenzie IZ. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159: 276-81.
25. Huissoud C, Dupont C, Canoui-Poitrine F, Touzet S, Dubernard G, Rudigoz RC. Decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesareans in the Aurore perinatal network. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;149:159-64.
26. Murphy DJ, Koh DK. Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for emergency operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:145e1-7.
27. Livermore LJ, Cochrane RM. Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1,000 emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26:307-10.
28. Moriarty KT, Onwuzurike B, Jones JJ, Jones MH. The 30 minutes decision-to-delivery interval for "urgent" caesarean sections: an elusive target. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26:736-9.
29. Holcroft CJ, Graham EM, Penning DH. Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval and the 30-minute rule for emergency cesareans. J Perinatol 2005;25:616.
30. Nasrallah FK, Harirah HM, Vadhera R, Jain V, Franklin LT, Hankins GD. The 30-minute decision-to-incision interval for emergency cesarean delivery: fact or fiction Am J Perinatol 2004;21:63-8.
31. Sayegh I, Dupuis O, Clement HJ, Rudigoz RC. Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;116:28-33.
32. Hillemanns P, Hasbargen U, Strauss A, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Hepp H. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003;268:136-41.
33. Kayani SI, Walkinshaw SA, Preston C. Pregnancy outcome in severe placental abruption. BJOG 2003;110:679-83.
34. Bruce D, Stone S, Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections-completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital. J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2002;22:273-8.
35. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. Prospective 12 month study of 30 minute decision to delivery intervals for "emergency" caesarean section. BMJ 2001;322:1334-5.
36. Chauhan SP, Mobley JA, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD, Martin JN Jr. Cesarean delivery for suspected fetal distress among preterm parturients. J Reprod Med 2000;45:395-402.
37. Lavery JP, Janssen J, Hutchinson L. Is the obstetric guideline of 30 minutes from decision to incision for Cesarean delivery clinically significant J Healthc Risk Manag 1999;19:11-20.
38. Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Beguin EA, Schaper AM, Spindler J. Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:151-5.
39. Quinn AJ, Kilpatrick A. Emergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;54:25-9.
40. Korhonen J, Kariniemi V. Emergency cesarean section: the effect of delay on umbilical arterial gas balance and Apgar scores. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:782-6.
41. Clark FL. Caesarean section: an audit of time-based efficiency in providing a clinical service. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;34:525-7.
42. Wareham V, Bain C, Cruickshank D. Caesarean section audit by peer review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;48: 9-14.
43. Dunphy BC, Robinson JN, Sheil OM, Nicholls JSD, Gillmer MDG. Caesarean section for fetal distress, the interval from decision to delivery, and the relative risk of poor neonatal condition. J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;11:241-4.
44. Kolas T, Hofoss D, Oian P. Predictions for the decision-todelivery interval for emergency cesarean sections in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:561-6.
45. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ 2004;328:665.
46. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360-3.
47. Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:945-50.
48. Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF, Esplin MS, Bardsley T. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:725-31.
49. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192-202.