Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 159, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 276-281

  Pearson, Greg A ^a   Kelly, Brenda ^b   Russell, Robin ^b   Dutton, Susan ^c   Kurinczuk, Jenny J ^c   MacKenzie, Ian Z ^c  

^a NORTH DEVON DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acidosis; Apgar; Caesarean section; Decision to delivery interval (DDI); Neurodevelopment

Indexed keywords

ACIDOSIS; ANTEPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; ASPHYXIA; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RISK FACTOR; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 82255175032     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Anaesthetists, Good Practice Guideline No.11. Classification of urgency of caesarean section - a continuum of risk. London: RCOG Press; April 2010. http://www.rcog.org.uk/classification-of-urgency-of-caesarean-section-good- practice-10.
2. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health/NICE. Caesarean section. London: RCOG Press; 2004.
3. D.N. Lucas, S.M. Yentis, and S.M. Kinsella Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification J R Soc Med 93 2000 346 350
4. I.Z. MacKenzie, and I. Cooke Prospective 12 month study of 30 min decision to delivery intervals for "emergency" caesarean BMJ 322 2001 1334 1335
5. I.Z. MacKenzie, and I. Cooke What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries BJOG 109 2002 498 504
6. D.J. Tuffnell, K. Wilkinson, and N. Beresford Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean sectionare current standards achievable? Observational case series BMJ 322 2001 1330 1333
7. K.T. Moriarty, B. Onwuzurike, J.J. Jones, and M.H. Jones The 30 min decision-to-delivery interval for 'urgent' caesarean sections: an elusive target J Obstet Gynaecol 26 2006 736 739
8. W.H. Helmy, A.S. Jolaoso, O.O. Ifaturoti, S.A. Afify, and M.H. Jones The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 min a realistic target? BJOG 109 2002 505 508
9. S.L. Bloom, K.J. Leveno, and C.Y. Spong Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes Obstet Gynecol 108 2006 6 11
10. C.J. Holcroft, E.M. Graham, and D.H. Penning Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval, and the 30-min rule for emergency caesareans J Perinatol 25 2005 229 235
11. J. Dennis, A. Johnson, L. Mutch, P. Yudkin, and P. Johnson Acid-base status at birth and neurodevelopmental outcome at four and one-half years Am J Obstet Gynecol 161 1989 213 220
12. G.S. Sykes, P. Johnson, and F. Ashworth Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia? Lancet 1 8270 1982 494 497
13. R. Mangaro, C. Mami, and M. Gemelli The validity of the Apgar scores in the assessment of asphyxia at birth Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 54 1994 99 102
14. Surman G, Newdick H, King A, Davenport H, Kurinczuk JJ. 4Child: four counties database of cerebral palsy, vision loss and hearing loss in children. Annual report 2009, including data for births 1984 to 2003. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford. Available from: http://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/4child/annualreport [accessed April 2010].
15. J. Thomas, S. Paranjothy, and D. James National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section BMJ 328 2004 665
16. W.J. Hannah, T.J. Baskett, and G.W. Chance Indications for caesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on aspects of cesarean birth CMAJ 134 1986 1348 1352
17. Maternal & Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. 7th annual report; 2000. p. 41-52.
18. NHS Litigation Authority. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts: maternity clinical risk management standards 2009/10. Version 2; 2010. p. 1-147. http://www.nhsla.com/RiskManagement/.
19. Y. Okunwobi-Smith, I. Cooke, and I.Z. MacKenzie Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery BJOG 107 2000 467 471
20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section audit report. London: RCOG Press; 2001. http://www.rcog.org.uk/orca/audit/completed-audits.
21. F. Reynolds, and P.T. Seed Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis Anaesthesia 60 2005 636 653