Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 725-731

  Holmgren, Calla ^a   Scott, James R ^a   Porter, T Flint ^a   Esplin, M Sean ^a   Bardsley, Tyler ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERUS RUPTURE;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC MODELS; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84859013741     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249a1d7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Landon MB. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2008;35:491-504, ix-x.
2. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:450-63.
3. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-9. (Pubitemid 39628579)
4. Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:342-50.
5. Kieser KE, Baskett TF. A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:749-53. (Pubitemid 35300033)
6. Little MO, Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, Harris LH, Kukla R, et al. Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:913-8.
7. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, et al. Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 2011;118:391-9.
8. Chazotte C, Cohen WR. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:738-42. (Pubitemid 20328723)
9. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1226-32. (Pubitemid 44336884)
10. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:927-32. (Pubitemid 24165382)
11. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1187-97.
12. Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 191 (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-1). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
13. National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Development Conference: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Consensus Development Conference Statement. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2010. Available at: http:/consensus.nih.gov/2010/images/vbac-statement.pdf. Retrieved July 4, 2011.
14. Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:945-50. (Pubitemid 23317533)
15. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:311-4. (Pubitemid 34165453)
16. Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:571-6. (Pubitemid 16014515)