Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 40-53

  Parmentier, Guy ^a,b   Mangematin, Vincent ^a,b  

^a IAE de Grenoble   (France)

^b GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Co innovation; Community management; Innovation; Online communities; User; Video game

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894414811     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Dahlander L., Magnusson M. How do firms make use of open source communities?. Long Range Plann. 2008, 41:629-649.
2. Burger-Helmchen T., Cohendet P. User community and social software in the video game industry. Long Range Plann. 2012, 44:317-343.
3. Faraj S., Jarvenpaa S.L., Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22:1224-1239.
4. Jarvenpaa S.L., Lang K.R. Boundary management in online communities: case studies of the nine inch nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Plann. 2011, 44:440-457.
5. Dahlander L., Magnusson M.G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy 2005, 34:481.
6. Dhanaraj C., Parkhe A. Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2006, 31:659-669.
7. Jeppesen L.B., Laursen K. The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Res. Policy 2009, 38:1582-1589.
8. Schreyogg G., Sydow J. Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 2010, 21:1251-1262.
9. Von Hippel E. Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manag. Sci. 1986, 32:791.
10. Lilien G.L., Morrison P.D., Searls K., Sonnack M., Von Hippel E. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48:1042.
11. Lüthje C. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: an empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation 2004, 24:683.
12. Mahr D., Lievens A. Virtual lead user communities: drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Res. Policy 2012, 41:167-177.
13. Pitta D.A., Fowler D. Online consumer communities and their value to new product developers. J. Brand Prod. Manag. 2005, 14:283-291.
14. Battilana J., Dorado S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Manage. J. 2010, 6:1419-1440.
15. Battard N., Mangematin V. Idiosyncratic distances: practices around mobile technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:231-242.
16. Sundaramurthy C., Kreiner G.E. Governing by managing identity boundaries: the case of family business. Enterp. Theory Pract. May 2008, 415-436.
17. Jeppesen L.B., Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 2006, 17:45-63.
18. Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 2003, 32:1159-1177.
19. Raymond E. The Cathedral and the Bazaar 1998.
20. Lüthje C., Herstatt C. The lead user method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Manag. 2004, 34:553.
21. Luthje C., Herstatt C., Von Hippel E. User-innovators and "local" information: the case of mountain biking. Res. Policy 2005, 34:951-965.
22. Franke N., Shah S. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 2003, 32:157-178.
23. Franke N., von Hippel E., Schreier M. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: a test of lead-user theory. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2006, 23:301-315.
24. Osterloh M., Rota S. Open source software development: just another case of collective invention?. Res. Policy 2007, 36:157-171.
25. Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Ind. Econ. 2002, 50:197.
26. Wiertz C., de Ruyter K. Beyond the call of duty: why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organ. Stud. 2007, 28:347-376. (01708406).
27. O'Mahony S.N., Ferraro F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Manage. J. 2007, 50:1079-1106.
28. Hemetsberger A., Reinhardt C. Collective development in open-source communities: an activity theoretical perspective on successful online collaboration. Organ. Stud. 2009, 30:987-1008. (01708406).
29. Stewart K.J., Gosain S. The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open-source software development teams. MIS Q. 2006, 30:291-314.
30. Raymond E. The Magic Cauldron 1999.
31. Dahlander L. Managing beyond firm boundaries: leveraging user innovation networks. Department of Technology Management and Economics 2006, 177. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
32. Hienerth C., Keinz P., Lettl C. Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Plann. 2011, 44:344-374.
33. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1989, 14:532.
34. Dahlander L., Frederiksen L. The core and cosmopolitans: a relational view of innovation in user communities. Organ. Sci. 2012, 23:988-1007.
35. Weick K. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the mann gulch disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 1993, 38:628-652.
36. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 1998, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
37. Duymedjian R., Rüling C.-C. Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organ. Stud. 2010, 31:133-151.
38. Carlile P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 2002, 13:442-457.
39. Licoppe C. Connected presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environ. Plann. D 2004, 22:135-156.
40. Ashforth B.E., Kreiner G.E., Fugate M. All in a day's work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2000, 25:472.
41. Von Hippel E. Perspective: user toolkits for innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2001, 18:247-257.
42. Von Hippel E., Katz R. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48:821-833.
43. Ebner W., Leimeister J.M., Krcmar H. Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Manag. 2009, 39:342-356.
44. Piller F.T., Walcher D. Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Manag. 2006, 36:307-318.
45. Fuller J., Jawecki G., Muhlbacher H. Innovation creation by online basketball communities. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60:60-71.
46. Franke N., Piller F. Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: the case of the watch market. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2004, 21:401.
47. Berger C., Piller F.T. Customers as co-designers. Manuf. Eng. 2003, 82:42-45.
48. Powell W.W., Koput K.W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation. Networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm. Sci Q. 1996, 41:116-145.
49. Dahlander L., Gann D.M. How open is innovation?. Res. Policy 2010, 39:699-709.
50. Dahlander L. Appropriation and appropriability in open source software. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2005, 9:259.
51. Danneels E. Tight-loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation. Strateg. Manag. J. 2003, 24:559.
52. Simpson B., Carroll B. Reviewing 'role' in processes of identity construction. Organization 2008, 15:29-50.
53. Von Hippel E. Breakthroughs to order at 3M. MIT Sloan School of Management 1999, MIT.