Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information

Management Science

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 449-462

  Li, Zhuoxin ^a   Gilbert, Stephen M ^a   Lai, Guoming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct and indirect channel; Information asymmetry; Supplier encroachment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894386820     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1780     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anand KS, Goyal M (2009) Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 55(3):438-452.
2. Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington DEM (2007) The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Sci. 26(5):651-659.
3. Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves G, de Kok T, eds. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 229-340.
4. Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629-646.
5. Cattani K, Gilland W, Heese HS, Swaminathan J (2006) Boiling frogs: Pricing strategies for a manufacturer adding a direct channel that competes with the traditional channel. Production Oper. Management 15(1):40-56.
6. Chiang WK, Chhajed D, Hess JD (2003) Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Sci. 49(1):1-20.
7. Cho IK, Kreps DM (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):179-221.
8. Fein AJ, Anderson E (1997) Patterns of credible commitments: Territory and brand selectivity in industrial distribution channels. J. Marketing 61(2):19-34.
9. Frazier GL, Lassar WM (1996) Determinants of distribution intensity. J. Marketing 60(4):39-51.
10. Ha AY, Tong S (2008) Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Management Sci. 54(4):701-715.
11. Ha AY, Tong S, Zhang H (2011) Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. 57(3):566-581.
12. Jiang B, Jerath K, Srinivasan K (2011) Firm strategies in the "mid tail" of platform-based retailing. Marketing Sci. 30(5):757-775.
13. Kong G, Rajagopalan S, Zhang H (2013) Revenue sharing and information leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 59(3):556-572.
14. Lariviere MA, Porteus EL (2001) Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(4):293-305.
15. Li L (2002) Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. 48(9):1196-1212.
16. Li L, Zhang H (2002) Supply chain information sharing in a competitive environment. Song JS, Yao DD, eds. Supply Chain Structures: Coordination, Information and Optimization (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA), 161-201.
17. Li Z, Gilbert S, Lai G (2013) Supplier encroachment as an enhancement or a hindrance to nonlinear pricing. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
18. McGuire TW, Staelin R (1983) An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. 2(2):161-191.
19. Nair G, Pleasance D (2005) Mitigating channel conflict. McKinsey Quart. 3:16-17.
20. Taylor TA, Xiao W (2010) Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better-forecasting retailer? Management Sci. 56(9):1584-1598.
21. Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2004) Channel conflict and coordination in the e-commerce age. Production Oper. Management 13(1):93-110.
22. Zhang H (2002) Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers. Production Oper. Management 11(4):531-546.