Clinimetric testing supports the use of 5 questionnaires adapted into Brazilian Portuguese for patients with shoulder disorders

Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 404-413

  De Oliveira Puga, Vanessa Olivieri ^a   Lopes, Alexandre Dias ^a   Shiwa, Silvia Regina ^a   Alouche, Sandra Regina ^a   Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena ^a,b  

^a MASTERS AND DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN PHYSICAL THERAPY   (Brazil)

^b GEORGE INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cross cultural adaptation; QuickDASH; Reliability; Responsiveness; SPADI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHOULDER PAIN;

BRAZIL; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SHOULDER PAIN;

EID: 84894383229     PISSN: 01906011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4441     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46:87-92. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ kel040
2. Barten JA, Pisters MF, Huisman PA, Takken T, Veenhof C. Measurement properties of patient-specific instruments measuring physical function. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:590-601. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.005
3. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186-3191.
4. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/ JBJS.D.02060
5. Bicer A, Ankarali H. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: a validation study in Turkish women. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:865-870.
6. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335-341.
7. Brox JI. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: shoulder pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17:33-56.
8. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820-829.
9. Cheng HM, Sampaio RF, Mancini MC, Fonseca ST, Cotta RM. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH): factor analysis of the version adapted to Portuguese/Brazil. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1901-1909. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/09638280701749342
10. Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:2459-2463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ BRS.0b013e3181849dbe
11. Croft P. Measuring up to shoulder pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:65-66.
12. da Cunha Menezes Costa L, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:934-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jclinepi.2009.03.019
13. da Cunha Menezes Costa L, Maher CG, McAuley JH, et al. The Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were reproducible, valid, and responsive in patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:903-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12. 009
14. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033-1039. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015
15. Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Tveitå EK, Keller A, Juel NG, Brox JI. Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:68. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-68
16. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Gautheron V, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Man Ther. 2009;14:206-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013
17. Fayad F, Macé Y, Lefevre-Colau MM. [Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;48:298-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.007
18. Fayad F, Macé Y, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M. [Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004;47:389-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05. 016
19. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, NY: Wiley; 1986.
20. Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:161. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-161
21. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44
22. Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S. Classifications and Scores of the Shoulder. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2006.
23. Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther. 1997;77:1079-1089.
24. Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:56-65. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3953
25. Hill CL, Lester S, Taylor AW, Shanahan ME, Gill TK. Factor structure and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in a population-based study of people with shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-8
26. Horn KK, Jennings S, Richardson G, van Vliet D, Hefford C, Abbott JH. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:30-42. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3727
27. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6602::AID- AJIM43.0.CO;2-L
28. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459-468.
29. Imaeda T, Toh S, Wada T, et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11:248-253. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00776-006-1013-1
30. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1109-1120. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030
31. MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachin K. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:12. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-12
32. Maher C, Latimer J, Costa L. The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11:245-252.
33. Martins J, Napoles BV, Hoffman CB, Oliveira AS. The Brazilian version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: translation, cultural adaptation and reliability. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14:527-536.
34. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:920-926. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015
35. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van den Brandt PA. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:268-276. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.005
36. Paul A, Lewis M, Shadforth MF, Croft PR, van der Windt DA, Hay EM. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1293-1299. http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/ard.2003.012088
37. Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:879-883.
38. Polson K, Reid D, McNair PJ, Larmer P. Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened Disability Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Man Ther. 2010;15:404-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.03.008
39. Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, Silman AJ. Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:308-312.
40. Puga VO, Lopes AD, Costa LO. Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of self-report outcome measures relevant to shoulder disability in Portuguese: a systematic review. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012;16:85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1413-35552012005000012
41. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991;4:143-149.
42. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:623-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ art.24396
43. Staples MP, Forbes A, Green S, Buchbinder R. Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:163-170. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.023
44. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
45. Tryon WW. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychol Methods. 2001;6:371-386.
46. Tveitå EK, Ekeberg OM, Juel NG, Bautz-Holter E. Responsiveness of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:161. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-161
47. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Boeke AJ, Devillé W, De Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:519-523.