Neo: An object model for handling electrophysiology data in multiple formats

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue FEB, 2014, Pages

  Garcia, Samuel ^a   Guarino, Domenico ^b   Jaillet, Florent ^c   Jennings, Todd ^d   Pröpper, Robert ^e   Rautenberg, Philipp L ^d   Rodgers, Chris C ^f   Sobolev, Andrey ^d   Wachtler, Thomas ^d   Yger, Pierre ^b   Davison, Andrew P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; File formats; Interoperability; Python; Software

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CURRENT CLAMP TECHNIQUE; DATA ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEO MODEL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE;

EID: 84894273994     PISSN: 16625196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davison, A. P., Bruderle, D., Eppler, J. M., Kremkow, J., Muller, E., Pecevski, D. A., et al. (2009). PyNN: a common interface for neuronal network simulators. Front. Neuroinform. 2:11. doi: 10.3389/neuro.ll.011.2008
2. Durka, P. J., and Ircha, D. (2004). SignalML: metaformat for description of biomedical time series. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 76, 253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.05.007
3. Garcia, S., and Fourcaud-Trocme, N. (2009). OpenElectrophy: an electrophysiological data- and analysis-sharing framework. Front. Neuroinform. 3:14. doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.014.2009
4. Grewe, J., Wachtler, T., and Benda, J. (2011).A bottom-up approach to data annotation in neurophysiology. Front. Neuroinform. 5:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00016
5. Halchenko, Y. O., and Hanke, M. (2012). Open is not enough. let's take the next step: an integrated, community-driven computing platform for neuroscience. Front. Neuroinform. 6:22. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2012.00022
6. Kemp, B. (2004). SignalML from an EDF+ perspective. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 76,261-263. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.05.008
7. Kemp, B., and Olivan, J. (2003). European data format 'plus' (EDF+), an EDF alike standard format for the exchange of physiological data. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1755-1761. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00123-8
8. Kemp, B., Vrri, A., Rosa, A. C., Nielsen, K. D., and Gade, J. (1992). A simple format for exchange of digitized polygraphic recordings. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82, 391-393. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90009-7
9. Manola, F., and Miller, E. (Eds.). (2004). RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium. Available online at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
10. Oliphant, T. E. (2007). Python for scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9,10-20. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58
11. Propper, R., and Obermayer, K. (2013). Spyke Viewer: a flexible and extensible platform for electrophysiological data analysis. Front. Neuroinform. 7:26. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00026
12. Schlogl, A. (2010). "An overview on data formats for biomedical signals," in World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 25/4, eds Dssel,O. and Schlegel,W. (Munich; Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 1557-1560.
13. Schlogl, A. (2006). GDF - a general dataformat for biosignals. Comput. Res. Repository. arXiv:cs/0608052v10 Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0608052
14. Sobolev, A., Stoewer, A., Pereira, M., Kellner, C. J., Garbers, C., Rautenberg, P. L., et al. (2014). Data management routines for reproducible research using the G-Node Python library. Front. Neuroinform. 8:15. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00015
15. Teeters, J. L., Benda, J., Davison, A. P., Eglen, S., Gerhard, S., Gerkin, R. C., et al. (2013). Considerations for developing a standard for storing electrophysiology data in HDF5, Front. Neuroinform. Conf. Abstract: Neuroinformatics 2013. doi: 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00069