Chemical surface modification of poly-ε-caprolactone improves Schwann cell proliferation for peripheral nerve repair

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 153-163

  De Luca, Alba C ^a   Terenghi, Giorgio ^a   Downes, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Nerve regeneration; Polycaprolactone; Schwann cells; Surface modification; Wettability

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHILICITY; NEURONS; POLYCAPROLACTONE; REPAIR; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; SURFACE TREATMENT; TOPOGRAPHY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE POLYMER; CHEMICAL SURFACE MODIFICATION; CLINICAL APPLICATION; NERVE REGENERATION; NERVE REPAIR; PERIPHERAL NERVE REPAIR; POLY(Ε CAPROLACTONE); SCHWANN CELLS; SURFACE-MODIFICATION; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

BIOMECHANICS;

POLYCAPROLACTONE;

ADULT; AMINOLYSIS; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILM; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCHWANN CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHY;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; NERVE REGENERATION; POLYCAPROLACTONE; SCHWANN CELLS; SURFACE MODIFICATION; WETTABILITY;

AMINES; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; NERVE REGENERATION; PERIPHERAL NERVES; POLYESTERS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SCHWANN CELLS; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 84894264598     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.1509     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ali SAM, Zhong SP et al. 1993; Mechanisms of polymer degradation in implantable devices: I. Poly(caprolactone). Biomaterials 14(9): 648-656.
2. Ang LP, Cheng ZY et al. 2006; The development of a serum-free derived bioengineered conjunctival epithelial equivalent using an ultrathin poly(epsilon-caprolactone) membrane substrate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(1): 105-112.
3. Bachmann J, Ellies A et al. 2000; Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency. Journal of Hydrology 231-232: 66-75.
4. Causa F, Battista E et al. 2010; Surface investigation on biomimetic materials to control cell adhesion: the case of RGD conjugation on PCL. Langmuir 26: 9875-9884.
5. Chen ZL, Yu WM et al. 2007; Peripheral regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 209-233.
6. Choong CS, Hutmacher DW et al. 2006; Co-culture of bone marrow fibroblasts and endothelial cells on modified polycaprolactone substrates for enhanced potentials in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 12(9): 2521-2531.
7. Croll TI, O'Connor AJ et al. 2004; Controllable surface modification of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) by hydrolysis or aminolysis I: physical, chemical and theoretical aspects. Biomacromolecules 5(2): 463-473.
8. de Ruiter GC, Malessy MJ et al. 2009; Designing ideal conduits for peripheral nerve repair. Neurosurg Focus 26(2): E5.
9. Elzein T, Nasser-Eddine M et al. 2004; FTIR study of polycaprolactone chain organization at interfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 273(2): 381-387.
10. Fisher JP, Mikos AG et al. Eds. 2007; Tissue engineering. CRC Press: Boca Raton, US.
11. Gopal R, Zuwei M et al. 2007; Surface modification and application of functionalized polymer fanofibers: 72-91.
12. Hall S. 1997; Axonal regeneration through acellular muscle grafts. J Anat 190(Pt 1): 57-71.
13. Ide C 1996; Peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurosci Res 25(2): 101-121.
14. Ikada Y. 1994; Surface modification of polymers for medical applications. Biomaterials 15(10): 725-736.
15. Khatiwala V, Shekhar N et al. 2008; Biodegradation of Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) Film by Alcaligenes faecalis. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 16(1): 61-67.
16. Khor HL, Ng KW et al. 2002; Poly(ε-caprolactone) films as a potential substrate for tissue engineering an epidermal equivalent. Materials Science and Engineering: C 20(1-2): 71-75.
17. Kim SH, Ha HJ et al. 2007; Correlation of proliferation, morphology and biological responses of fibroblasts on LDPE with different surface wettability. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 18(5): 609-622.
18. Kweon H, Yoo MK et al. 2003; A novel degradable polycaprolactone networks for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24(5): 801-808.
19. Lee JH, Jung HW et al. 1994; Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces with different functional groups. Biomaterials 15(9): 705-711.
20. Lee MH, Brass DA et al. 2005; The effect of non-specific interactions on cellular adhesion using model surfaces. Biomaterials 26(14): 1721-1730.
21. Lee SJ, Khang G et al. 2003; The effect of surface wettability on induction and growth of neurites from the PC-12 cell on a polymer surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 259(2): 228-235.
22. Lee W-K, Gardella JA. 2000; Hydrolytic kinetics of biodegradable polyester monolayers. Langmuir 16(7): 3401-3406.
23. Lensen MC, Schulte VA et al. 2008; Cellular responses to novel, micropatterned biomaterials. Pure and Applied Chemistry 80(11): 2479-2487.
24. Lin W-J, Flanagan DR et al. 1994; Accelerated degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) by organic amines. Pharmaceutical Research 11(7): 1030-1034.
25. Liu X, Lim JY et al. 2007; Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials 28(31): 4535-4550.
26. Ng KW, Achuth HN et al. 2007; In vivo evaluation of an ultra-thin polycaprolactone film as a wound dressing. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 18: 925-938.
27. Pitt CG, Chasalow FI et al. 1981; Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) in vivo. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 26(11): 3779-3787.
28. Santiago LY, Nowak RW et al. 2006; Peptide-surface modification of poly(caprolactone) with laminin-derived sequences for adipose-derived stem cell applications. Biomaterials 27(15): 2962-2969.
29. Schmidt CE, Leach JB. 2003; Neural tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 5: 293-347.
30. Sherratt MJ, Holmes DF et al. 2004; Substrate-dependent morphology of supramolecular assemblies: fibrillin and Type-VI collagen microfibrils. Biophysical Journal 86(5): 3211-3222.
31. Soria JM, Ramos CM et al. 2007; Influence of the substrate's hydrophilicity on the in vitro Schwann cells viability. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 83A(2): 463-470.
32. Sun M, Downes S. 2007; Solvent-cast PCL films support the regeneration of NG108-15 nerve cells, SPIE: Harbin, China.
33. Sun M, Downes S. 2009; Physicochemical characterisation of novel ultra-thin biodegradable scaffolds for peripheral nerve repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(5): 1181-1192.
34. Tamada Y, Ikada Y. 1994; Fibroblast growth on polymer surfaces and biosynthesis of collagen. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 28(7): 783-789.
35. Tan PS and Teoh SH. 2007; Effect of stiffness of polycaprolactone (PCL) membrane on cell proliferation. Materials Science and Engineering: C 27(2): 304-308.
36. Tang ZG, Black RA et al. 2004; Surface properties and biocompatibility of solvent-cast poly[-caprolactone] films. Biomaterials 25(19): 4741-4748.
37. Terenghi G 1999; Peripheral nerve regeneration and neurotrophic factors. J Anat 194(Pt 1): 1-14.
38. Van de Velde K and Kiekens P. 2002; Biopolymers: overview of several properties and consequences on their applications. Polymer Testing 21(4): 433-442.
39. Vandamme MPI, Tiglias J et al. 1994; Determination of the charge content at the surface of cells using a colloid titration technique. Analytical Biochemistry 223(1): 62-70.
40. Vargas ME and Barres BA. 2007; Why is wallerian degeneration in the CNS so slow? Annual Review of Neuroscience 30: 153-179.
41. Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, de Ruiter GC et al. 2007; Pores in synthetic nerve conduits are beneficial to regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 80(4): 965-982.
42. von der Mark K, Park J et al. 2009; Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res 339: 131-153.
43. Wei Y, Zhou J et al. 2009; An improved method for isolating Schwann cells from postnatal rat sciatic nerves. Cell Tissue Res 337(3): 361-369.
44. Wiberg M, Terenghi G. 2003; Will it be possible to produce peripheral nerves? Surg Technol Int 11: 303-310.
45. Yavin E, Yavin Z. 1974; Attachment and culture of dissociated cells from rat embryo cerebral hemispheres on polylysine-coated surface. Journal of Cell Biology 62(2): 540-546.
46. Yeo A, Wong WJ et al. 2010; Surface modification of PCL-TCP scaffolds in rabbit calvaria defects: Evaluation of scaffold degradation profile, biomechanical properties and bone healing patterns. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 93A(4): 1358-1367.
47. Zhu Y, Gao C et al. 2002; Surface modification of polycaprolactone membrane via aminolysis and biomacromolecule immobilization for promoting cytocompatibility of human endothelial cells. Biomacromolecules 3(6): 1312-1319.