Guidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 186, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Schünemann, Holger J ^a,b   Wiercioch, Wojtek ^a   Etxeandia, Itziar ^a   Falavigna, Maicon ^a,h   Santesso, Nancy ^a   Mustafa, Reem ^a,f   Ventresca, Matthew ^a,c   Brignardello Petersen, Romina ^o,p   Laisaar, Kaja Triin ^k   Kowalski, Sérgio ^a   Baldeh, Tejan ^a   Zhang, Yuan ^a   Raid, Ulla ^j   Neumann, Ignacio ^a,i   Norris, Susan L ^g   Thornton, Judith ^m   Harbour, Robin ⁿ   Treweek, Shaun ^l   Guyatt, Gordon ^a   Alonso Coello, Pablo ^a   Reinap, Marge ^a   Brožek, Jan ^a,b   Oxman, Andrew ^q   Akl, Elie A ^a,d,e   more..

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^e UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

ⁱ PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^j WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^m NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^o UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^p UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^q Norwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CROWDSOURCING; GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

CHECKLIST; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84894232568     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.131237     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010;182:E839-42.
2. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:525-31.
3. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller D, et al., editors; Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011. Available: www.nap.edu/openbook .php?record-id=13058 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
4. Ahmed F, Temte JL, Campos-Outcalt D, et al. Methods for developing evidence-based recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vaccine 2011; 29:9171-6.
5. Guyatt GH, Norris SL, Schulman S, et al. Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):53S-70S.
6. Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:12.
7. Eccles MP, Grimshaw J, Shekelle P, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci 2012;7:60.
8. Woolf S, Schunemann H, Eccles M, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012;7:61.
9. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw J, et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implement Sci 2012;7:62.
10. Schünemann HJ, Hill SR, Kakad M, et al. Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines. PLoS Med 2007;4: e119.
11. Schünemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A guide to guidelines for professional societies and other developers of recommendations: introduction to integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:215-8.
12. Field MJ, Lohr N, editors; Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1990. Available: www.nap.edu/openbook .php?record-id=1626 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
13. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490.
14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:1049-51.
15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336:1170-3.
16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008; 336: 995-8.
17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-6.
18. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ 2008;337:a744.
19. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies [published erratum in BMJ 2008;24:336]. BMJ 2008; 336:1106-10.
20. Eesti Haigekassa, Tartu Ülikool. Estonian handbook for guidelines development. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2011. Available: whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502429-eng.pdf (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
21. Yang K, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. Editorial: Can China master the guideline challenge? Health Res Policy Syst 2013;11:1.
22. Treweek S, Oxman AD, Alderson P, et al. Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci 2013;8:6.
23. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, et al. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 493-8.
24. Clinical practice guideline process manual, 2011 ed. St. Paul (MN): American Academy of Neurology; 2011. Available: www .aan .com/Guidelines/Home/ Development (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
25. Practice guidelines and technical standards handbook. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 2011. Available: www .acr.org/-/media/ACR/ Documents/PGTS/DevelopmentHandbook .pdf (accessed 2013 June 26).
26. Policy and procedure manual for clinical practice guidelines. Atlanta (GA): American College of Rheumatology; 2012. Available: www.rheumatology.org/ Practice/Clinical/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines (accessed 2013 July 5).
27. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline procedures manual: expert panel version 4.0. Alexandria (VA): American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2011. Available: www.asco .org/sites/default/files/methodology-manual-1.25.11-0. pdf (ac-cessed 2013 Apr. 22).
28. Overview: standard operating procedures. Linthicum (MD): American Urological Association; 2011. Available: www.auanet .org/common/pdf/education/ Guidelines-SOP.pdf. (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
29. Principles for the development of specialty society clinical guidelines. Chicago (IL): Council of Medical Specialty Societies; 2012. Available: www.cmss.org/DefaultTwoColumn .aspx?id=505 (accessed 2013 July 5).
30. Dougados M, Betteridge N, Burmester GR, et al. EULAR standardised operating procedures for the elaboration, evaluation, dissemination, and implementation of recommendations endorsed by the EULAR standing committees. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:1172-6.
31. Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision (LEGEND) evidencebased care guideline development and update process. Cincinnati (OH): Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Evidence-Based Care Group; 2006. Available: www .cincinnatichildrens .org/service/j/anderson-center/evidence-based-care/legend (ac-cessed 2013 Apr. 22).
32. Methodology manual and policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Washington (DC): American College of Cardiology Foundation/Dallas (TX): American Heart Association; 2010. Available: my.americanheart.org/ professional/Statements Guidelines/PoliciesDevelopment/Development/ Methodologies-and-Policies-from-the-ACCAHA-Task-Force-on-Practice-Guidelines- UCM-320470-Article.jsp (ac cessed 2013 Apr. 2).
33. Canadian Task Force on preventive health care procedure manual. Edmonton (AB): Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care; 2011. Available: canadiantaskforce.ca/methods/methods-manual/ (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
34. Program in evidence-based care handbook. Hamilton (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2012. Available: www.cancercare.on.ca/about/programs/pebc/pebc- products/ (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
35. Guidelines and recommendations: a CDC primer. Atlanta (GA): Office of the Associate Director for Science Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.
36. Davino-Ramaya C, Krause LK, Robbins CW, et al. Transparency matters: Kaiser Permanente's National Guideline Program methodological processes. Perm J 2012;16:55-62.
37. US preventive services task force procedure manual. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/methods/procmanual.htm (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
38. Esandi ME, Luca MD, Chapman E, et al. Guía para la adaptación de guías de práctica clínica. Buenos Aires (Argen-tina): Academia Nacional de Medicina Buenos Aires; 2008. Available: publicaciones.ops.org.ar/publicaciones/otras%20pub/GuiadeGuias.pdf (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
39. Gutiérrez GC, Bossert T, Espinosa JQ, et al. Guía metodológica para la elaboración de guías de atención integral en el sistema general de seguridad social en salud colombiano. Bogotà (Col-ombia): Ministerio de la Protección Social; 2010. Available: www .minsalud.gov.co/Documentos%20y%20Publicaciones/ GUIA % 20METODOLOGICA%20PARA%20LA%20ELABORACI % C3%93N%20DE%20GU%C3%8DAS%20DE%20ATENCI%C3 %93N%20INTEGRAL.pdf (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
40. Norma técnica para la elaboración de guías de practica clinica. Lima (Perú): Ministerio de Salud de Perú; 2005. Available: bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/1176-DGSP196.pdf (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
41. Recommendations for guidelines production. Sophia Antipolis (France): European Society of Cardiology; 2010. Available: www.escardio.org/guidelines- surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
42. The guidelines manual. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available: publications .nice .org.uk/the-guidelines- manual-pmg6 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
43. SIGN 50: a guideline developer's handbook. Edinburgh (UK): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2011. Available: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/ fulltext/50/ (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
44. Elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en el sistema nacional de salud: manual metodológico. Zaragoza (Spain): Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2007. Available: www.guiasalud.es/emanuales/ elaboracion/index-02.html (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
45. WHO handbook for guideline development. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2012. Available: apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75146/1/ 9789241548441-eng.pdf (ac cessed 2013 Apr. 22).
46. Procedures and requirements for meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines. Canberra (Australia): Na tional Health and Medical Research Council; 2011. Available: www .nhmrc .gov.au/guidelines/publications/ cp133-and-cp133a (ac cessed 2013 Apr. 22).
47. Handbook for the preparation of explicit evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Wellington (New Zealand): New Zealand Guidelines Group; 2001.
48. Clinical practice guidelines. Kuala Lampur (Malaysia): Academy of Medicine of Malaysia; 2013. Available: www.acadmed .org.my/index.cfm? &menuid=67 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
49. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare website. Tokyo (Japan): Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare; 2013. Available: www.mhlw .go.jp/english (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
50. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia website. Jakarta (Indonesia): Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia; 2013. Available: www.depkes.go.id/ index.php?In=LG-2 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
51. Guidelines [in Turkish]. Ankara (Turkey): Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health; 2013. Available: www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/belge/1-339/yonergeler.html (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
52. Clinical practice guidelines. Santiago (Chile): Chile Ministry of Health; 2013. Available: www.minsal.gob.cl/portal/url/page/minsalcl/g-gesauge/guias. html (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
53. Guidance. Stockhom (Sweden): European Center for Disease Prevention and Control; 2013. Available: www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/guidance/Pages/ index.aspx (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
54. Systematic evidence reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Bethesda (MD): National Heart Lung and Blood Institute; 2013. Available: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/index.htm (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
55. Clinical guidelines portal [federally approved HIV/AIDS medical practice guidelines]. Rockville (MD): AIDSinfo; US Department of Health and Human Services. Available: aidsinfo .nih .gov/guidelines (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
56. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P. Clinical practice guideline development manual, third edition: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;148(1 Suppl):S1-S55.
57. ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guideline adaptation. Version 2.0. Berlin (Germany): Guideline International Network; 2009. Available: www.g-i-n .net/document-store/working-groups-documents/ adaptation/adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-2-0.pdf (accessed 2013 July 5).
58. Manuscript development process. Washington (DC): American College of Cardiology Foundation/Dallas (TX): American Heart Association; 2010. Available: my.americanheart .org/professional/StatementsGuidelines/PoliciesDevelopment/ Policies-Development-UCM-316897-Article.jsp (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
59. Supplementary methodology manual for AHA stroke council guideline writing groups. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association Stroke Council; 2010. Available: my.americanheart.org/professional/StatementsGuidelines/ PoliciesDevelopment/Policies-Development-UCM-316897-Article.jsp (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
60. Jacobs AK, Kushner FG, Ettinger SM, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:213-65.
61. Program in evidence-based care document assessment and review protocol. Hamilton (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2012. Available: www.cancercare.on.ca/about/ programs/pebc/document-review/ (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
62. Program in evidence-based care conflict of interest policy. Hamilton (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2011. Available: www .cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx? objectId=7582&contextId=1377 (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
63. The guidelines manual: appendix A-agreements and advice for guideline development group members. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available: publications.nice.org.uk/pmg6a (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
64. How NICE clinical guidelines are developed: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS. 5th ed. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available: publications.nice.org.uk/pmg6f (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
65. Positively equal: a guide to addressing equality issues in developing clinical guidelines. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available: www.nice.org .uk/aboutnice/howwework/ developingniceclinicalguidelines/Positively Equal.jsp (accessed 2013 July 5).
66. Guideline development and conflicts of interest: identifying and managing conflicts of interest of prospective members and members of NHMRC committees and working groups developing guidelines. Canberra (Australia): National Health and Medical Research Council; 2012. Available: www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-and- publications/information-guideline-developers/guideline-development-and- conflicts (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
67. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ 2010;182:1045-52.
68. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ 2010;182:E472-8.
69. COGS: the conference on guideline standardization. New Haven (CT): Yale Center for Medical Informatics; 2003. Available: gem.med.yale.edu/cogs/ statement.do (accessed 2013 Apr. 22).
70. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:13
71. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:14
72. Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:15
73. Boyd EA, Bero L. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Managing conflicts of interests. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:16
74. Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:17
75. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Determining which outcomes are important. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4:18
76. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:19
77. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:20
78. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:21
79. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4:
80. Edejer TT. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability and resource implications. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4:23
81. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Incorporating considerations of equity. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:24
82. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:25
83. Oxman AD, Schünemann H, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:26
84. Fretheim A, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Disseminating and implementing guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:27
85. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Evaluation. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:28
86. Yawn BP, Akl EA, Qaseem A, et al. Identifying target audiences: Who are the guidelines for?: article 1 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:219-24.
87. Atkins D, Perez-Padilla R, MacNee W, et al. Priority setting in guideline development: article 2 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:225-8.
88. Kunz R, Fretheim A, Cluzeau F, et al. Guideline group composition and group processes: article 3 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:229-33.
89. Boyd EA, Akl EA, Baumann M, et al. Guideline funding and conflicts of interest: article 4 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:234-42.
90. Wilt TJ, Guyatt G, Kunz R, et al. Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:243-50.
91. Hill SR, Olson LG, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability, and resource implications in guideline development: article 6 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:251-5.
92. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Oxman A, et al. Synthesis, grading, and pres-entation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in integrating and coordinating efforts in copd guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:256-61.
93. Kelson M, Akl EA, Bastian H, et al. Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:262-8.
94. Cluzeau F, Wedzicha JA, Kelson M, et al. Stakeholder involvement: how to do it right: article 9 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:269-73.
95. Fabbri LM, Boyd C, Boschetto P, et al. How to integrate multiple comorbidities in guideline development: article 10 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012; 9:274-81.
96. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:282-92.
97. Wilson KC, Irwin RS, File TM, et al. Reporting and publishing guidelines: article 12 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:293-7.
98. Grimshaw JM, Schünemann HJ, Burgers J, et al. Disseminating and implementing guidelines: article 13 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:298-303.
99. Burgers JS, Anzueto A, Black PN, et al. Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines: article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2012;9:304-10.
100. Health systems strengthening glossary. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2013. Available: www.who.int/healthsystems/hss-glossary/en/index. html (accessed 2013 July 26).
101. Institute of Medicine Committee on Methods for Setting Priorities for Guidelines Development. Setting priorities for clinical practice guidelines.Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1995.
102. Hofmann B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21:312-8.