Clinical practice guideline development manual, third edition: A quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 148, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Rosenfeld, Richard M ^a   Shiffman, Richard N ^b   Robertson, Peter ^c  

^a SUNY Downstate Medical Center   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c American Academy of Otolaryngology   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guideline; Evidence based medicine; Manual; Otolaryngology

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIHISTAMINIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CORTICOSTEROID; DECONGESTIVE AGENT; DEXAMETHASONE; MUCOLYTIC AGENT; STEROID;

ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS; ACUTE SINUSITIS; ADENOIDECTOMY; ALLERGY; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BACTERIAL SINUSITIS; BENIGN PAROXYSMAL POSITIONAL VERTIGO; CAREGIVER BURDEN; CHRONIC SINUSITIS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG COST; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXTERNAL OTITIS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEAD AND NECK SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEER REVIEW; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHARYNGITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RASH; RELIABILITY; SCOPE OF PRACTICE; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SINUSITIS; SUDDEN DEAFNESS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TONSILLECTOMY; TONSILLITIS; UTILIZATION REVIEW; ALGORITHM; BOOK; EAR NOSE THROAT DISEASE; EAR NOSE THROAT SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MANUALS AS TOPIC; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC DISEASES; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84874187802     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812467004     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Chinese proverbs quotes. http://www.thinkexist.com/. Accessed April 12, 2009.
2. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guidelines: a manual for developing evidence-based guidelines to facilitate performance measurement and quality improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(suppl):S1-S28.
3. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140(suppl):S1-S43.
4. Rosenfeld RM, Brown L, Cannon CR, et al. Acute otitis externa clinical practice guideline. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(suppl):S4-S23.
5. Rosenfeld RM, Andes D, Bhattacharyya N, et al. Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(suppl):S1-S31.
6. Roland PS, Smith TL, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(suppl):S1-S21.
7. Bhattacharrya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, et al. Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(suppl):S47-S81.
8. Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Dailey SH, et al. Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 141(suppl):S1-S31.
9. Baugh RF, Archer SM, Mitchell RB, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(suppl):S1-S30.
10. Roland PS, Rosenfeld RM, Brooks LJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline: polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing prior to tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(suppl):S1-S15.
11. Stachler RJ, Chandrasekhar SS, Archer SM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: sudden hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(suppl):S1- S35.
12. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
13. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:525-531.
14. Shiffman RN, Michel G, Rosenfeld RM, Davidson C. Building better guidelines with BRIDGE-Wiz: development and evaluation of a software assistant to promote clarity, transparency, and implementability. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:94-101.
15. Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, eds. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008.
16. Shiffman RN, Marcuse EK, Moyer VA, et al. Toward transparent clinical policies. Pediatrics. 2008;121:643-646.
17. Turner T, Misso M, Harris C, Green S. Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs): comparing approaches. Implement Sci. 2008;3;45:1-8.
18. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527-530.
19. Brouwers MC; the AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. http://www.agreetrust.org/. Accessed July 21, 2012.
20. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage M, et al. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:493-498.
21. AAP Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. Policy statement: classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. Pediatrics. 2004;114:874-877.
22. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;18:593-596.
23. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines. Report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest. 2006;129:174-181.
24. American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Quality improvement and patient safety information. http://www.entnet.org/ Practice/quality.cfm. Accessed April 14, 2009.
25. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Guidelines Manual. 4th ed. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009. www.nice.org.uk
26. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer's Handbook. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2011. www.sign.ac.uk
27. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990.
28. Fretheim A, Schǔnemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development, 3: group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Systems. 2006;4:15-21.
29. US Cochrane Center. Consumers United for Evidence-based Healthcare (CUE). http://us.cochrane.org/CUE. Accessed July 21, 2012.
30. Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Burda BU. Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25153.
31. Mendelson TB, Meltzer M, Campbell EG, Caplan AL, Kirkpatrick JN. Conflicts of interest in cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:577-585.
32. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, et al. The vexing problem of guidelines and conflicts of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:738-741.
33. Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P, for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:194-199.
34. American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Code for interaction with companies. Adopted 2011. http://www.entnet.org/ aboutus/Ethics.cfm. Accessed July 21, 2012.
35. Tricoci PT, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;310:831-841.
36. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman, for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;332:b2535.
37. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-2012.
38. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton, eds. Finding What Works in Healthcare: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
39. Rosenfeld RM, Singer M, Wasserman JM, Stinett SS. Systematic review of antimicrobial therapy for acute otitis externa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(suppl):S24-S48.
40. Rosenfeld RM, Singer M, Jones S. Systematic review of antimicrobial therapy in patients with acute rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(3)(suppl):S32-S45.
41. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:68.
42. Choudhry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS. Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA. 2002;287:612-617.
43. Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:S95-S118.
44. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1 (updated September 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008: section 6.4.11.1. www.cochrane-handbook.org
45. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
46. Jǔni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42-46.
47. Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, et al. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomized controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4012. doi:10.1136/bmj.b4012.
48. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org
49. Wharam JF, Sulmasy D. Improving the quality of health care: who is responsible for what? JAMA. 2009;301:215-217.
50. Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Clancy C, Westert GP, Schneider EC. Current guidelines have limited applicability to patients with comorbid conditions: a systematic analysis of evidencebased guidelines. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25987. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025987.
51. ThinkExist.com. John Ruskin quotes. http://www.thinkexist. com. Accessed July 22, 2012.
52. Booth A. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24:355-368.
53. Rios LP, Ye C, Thabane L. Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and report quality of randomized trials. BMC Med Res Method. 2010;10:11. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/11. Accessed July 22, 2012.
54. Hussain T, Michael G, Shiffman RN. The Yale Guideline Recommendation Corpus: a representative sample of the knowledge content of guidelines. Int J Med Informat. 2009;78:354-363.
55. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou; OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed July 23, 2012.
56. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schǔnemann, et al. GRADE guidelines, 3: rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401-406.
57. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926.
58. Grading or Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Accessed February 23, 2009.
59. Lomotan E, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How ''should'' we write guideline recommendation? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Saf Healthcare. 2010;19: 509-513.
60. Azer SA. Challenges facilitating PBL tutors: 12 tips for successful group facilitation. Med Teacher. 2005;27;676-681.
61. Essaihi A, Michel G, Shiffman RN. Comprehensive categorization of guideline recommendations: creating an action palate for implementers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003: 220-224.
62. Codish S, Shiffman RN. A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:146-150.
63. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2007;7:16.
64. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines, 4: rating the quality of evidence - study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407-415.
65. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines, 6: rating the quality of evidence - imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283-1293.
66. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines, 7: rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294-1302.
67. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines, 8: rating the quality of evidence - indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303-1310.
68. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines, 9: rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1311-136.
69. Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA. 2010;304:903-904.
70. Alambuya RN, Ali S, Apostolidis K, et al. Salzburg Statement on shared decision making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745. doi:10. 1136/bmj.d1745.
71. Society for Medical Decision Making Committee on Standardization of Clinical Algorithms. Proposal for clinical algorithm standards. Med Decis Making. 1992;12:149-154. http://www.acponline.org/sci-policy/guidelines/ algorithms.htm
72. Hadorn DC. Use of algorithms in clinical guideline development. In: Clinical Practice Guideline Development: Methodology Perspectives. AHCPR Pub. No. 95-0009. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1995:93-104. http://www.acponline.org/sci-policy/guidelines/algorithms.htm
73. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2005;5:23. http://www.biomedcentral. com/1472-6947/5/23. Accessed July 25, 2012.
74. Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA. 2009;301:429-431.
75. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/26. Accessed July 25, 2012.
76. Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw M, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ. 2001;323:155-157.