Central venous access by trainees: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of simulation to improve success rate on patients

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 7-14

  Madenci, Arin L ^a,b   Solis, Carolina V ^b,c   De Moya, Marc A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Graduate medical education; Simulation; Surgical training; Vascular access devices

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; MEDICAL STUDENT; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD; TEACHING;

CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; PATIENT SIMULATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84894155836     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a3df26     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Rodriguez-Paz JM, Kennedy M, Salas E, et al. Beyond "see one, do one, teach one": toward a different training paradigm. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18(1):63-68.
2. Volpp KG, Grande D. Residents' suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med 2003;348:851-855.
3. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;79(Suppl 10):S70YS81.
4. Mittal MK, Dumon KR, Edelson PK, et al. Successful Implementation of the American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery Surgical Skills Curriculum via a 4-week consecutive simulation rotation. Simul Healthc 2012:147-154.
5. Cook DA. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: what role do they play? Med Teach 2012;34(6):468-473.
6. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306(9):978-988.
7. Ma IW, Brindle ME, Ronksley PE, Lorenzetti DL, Sauve RS, Ghali WA. Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2011;86:1137-1147.
8. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011;86(6):706-711.
9. Andreatta P, Chen Y, Marsh M, Cho K. Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs. Support Care Cancer 2010;19(4):539-543.
10. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Balachandran JS, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit. J Hosp Med 2009;4(7):397-403.
11. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O'Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2009;37(10):2697-2701.
12. Britt RC, Novosel TJ, Britt LD, Sullivan M. The impact of central line simulation before the ICU experience. Am J Surg 2009; 197(4):533-536.
13. De Ponti R, Marazzi R, Ghiringhelli S, Salerno-Uriarte JA, Calkins H, Cheng A. Superiority of simulator-based training compared with conventional training methodologies in the performance of transseptal catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(4):359-363.
14. Evans LV, Dodge KL, Shah TD, et al. Simulation training in central venous catheter insertion: improved performance in clinical practice. Acad Med 2010;85(9):1462-1469.
15. Smith CC, Huang GC, Newman LR, et al. Simulation training and its effect on long-term resident performance in central venous catheterization. Simul Healthc 2010;5(3):146-151.
16. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Sillin LF, et al. Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. Am J Surg 2004;187(1):114-119.
17. Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
18. Myers JS, Bellini LM, Morris JB, et al. Internal medicine and general surgery residents' attitudes about the ACGME duty hours regulations: a multicenter study. Acad Med. 2006;81(12):1052-1058.
19. Stefanidis D, Arora S, Parrack DM, et al. Research priorities in surgical simulation for the 21st century. Am J Surg 2012;203(1):49-53.
20. Woodward HI, Mytton OT, Lemer C, et al.What have we learned about interventions to reduce medical errors? Annu Rev Public Health 31:479-497 471 p following 497.
21. Kaye AD, Fox CJ, Hymel BJ, et al. The importance of training for ultrasound guidance in central vein catheterization. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2011;21(1):61-66.
22. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(15):1420-1423.
23. Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH, et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc 2010;5(2):98-102.
24. Khouli H, Jahnes K, Shapiro J, et al. Performance of medical residents in sterile techniques during central vein catheterization: randomized trial of efficacy of simulation-based training. Chest 2011;139(1):80-87.
25. Berg DA, Milner RE, Fisher CA, Goldberg AJ, Dempsey DT, Grewal H. A cost-effective approach to establishing a surgical skills laboratory. Surgery 2007;142(5):712-721.
26. Kapadia MR, DaRosa DA, MacRae HM, Dunnington GL. Current assessment and future directions of surgical skills laboratories. J Surg Educ 2007;64(5):260-265.