Reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions by energy efficiency measures and international trading: A bottom-up modeling for the U.S. iron and steel sector

Applied Energy

Volumn 120, Issue , 2014, Pages 133-146

  Karali, Nihan ^a   Xu, Tengfang ^a   Sathaye, Jayant ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bottom up optimization modeling; CO2 emission; Energy consumption; Industry Sector Energy Efficiency Modeling (ISEEM); Trading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894098583     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.055     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. International Energy Agency. Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emission. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/tracking_emissions.pdf.
2. World Steel Association. Steel statistical yearbook 2011. World steel committee on economic studies. Brussels. [accessed November 2013. http://www.worldsteel.org/dms/internetDocumentList/statistics-archive/yearbook-archive/Steel-statistical-yearbook-2011/document/Steel%20statistical%20yearbook%202011.pdf.
3. Worrell E., Price L., Martin N., Farla J., Schaeffer R. Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical and economic indicators. Energy Policy 1997, 25:727-744.
4. Worrell E, Blinde P, Neelis M, Blomen E, Masanet E. Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the U.S. iron and steel industry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-4779E. [accessed November 2013. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/industry/downloads/ENERGY_STAR_Iron_and_Steel_Guide.pdf.
5. Xu T, Sathaye J, Kramer K. Development of bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the pulp and paper sector. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-5801E. Berkeley; 2012.
6. Xu T., Sathaye J., Kramer K. Sustainability options in pulp and paper making: costs of conserved energy and carbon reduction in the U.S. Sustain Cities Soc 2013, 8:56-62.
7. Xu T., Galama T., Sathaye J. Reducing carbon footprint in cement material making: characterizing costs of conserved energy and reduced carbon emissions. Sustain Cities Soc 2013, 9:54-61.
8. 2 emission reduction potentials in India's iron and steel industry 2012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley.
9. Hasanbeigi A, Morrow W, Sathaye J, Masanet E, Xu T. Assessment of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the iron and steel industry in China. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-5535E. [accessed November 2013. http://ies.lbl.gov/drupal.files/ies.lbl.gov.sandbox/CSC%20for%20the%20steel%20industry-FINAL-rev%2014Nov2012.pdf.
10. 2 emissions reduction opportunities in the cement industry in China. Energy Policy 2013, 57:287-297.
11. 2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy - Int J 2013, 50:315-325.
12. 2 emissions at the national level. Appl Energy 2010, 87:2928-2937.
13. Wang K., Lu B., Wei Y. China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: A range-adjusted measure based analysis. Appl Energy 2013, 112:1403-1415.
14. 2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 2012, 98:198-208.
15. Kong L., Price L., Hasanbeigi A., Liu H., Li J. Potential for reducing paper mill energy use and carbon dioxide emissions through plant-wide energy audits: a case study in China. Appl Energy 2013, 102:1334-1342.
16. 2 emissions of energy intensive industries through decision support systems - an example of application to the steel industry. Appl Energy 2013, 112:818-833.
17. 2 emissions in Croatian cement industry. Appl Energy 2013, 101:41-48.
18. Jaber J.O. Future energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Jordanian industries. Appl Energy 2002, 71:15-30.
19. Schrattenholzer L. The energy supply model MESSAGE 1981, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg.
20. Van der Voort E, Donnie E, Thonet C, Bois d'Enghien E, Dechamps C, Guilmot J. Energy supply modeling package EFOM-12C Mark 1 mathematical description. Commission of the European Comminities. Louvain-a-Neuve; 1984.
21. Capros P, Karadeloglu P. Energy and carbon tax: a quantitative analysis using the HERMES MIDAS model. SEO Conference. Amsterdam; 1992.
22. Loulou R, Goldstein G, Noble K. Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. IEA-ETSAP. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.etsap.org/MrklDoc-I_StdMARKAL.pdf.
23. Karali N. Design and development of a large scale energy model. Ph.D. Thesis. Bogazici University. Istanbul, Turkey; 2012.
24. McFarland J.R., Reilly J., Herzog H.J. Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information. Energy Econ 2004, 26:685-707.
25. Fawcett AA, Sands RD. The second generation model: model description and theory. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. PNNL-15432. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.epa.gov/air/sgm_theory_final_1.pdf.
26. Hertel TW. Global applied general equilibrium analysis using the GTAP framework. In: Dixon PB, Jorgenson DW, editors. Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling. Elsevier Publishers; 2012.
27. Karali N, Xu T, Sathaye J. Industrial sector energy efficiency modeling (ISEEM) framework documentation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-6078E. [accessed November 2013. http://eetd.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/iseem_framework_final_lbnl-6078e.pdf.
28. The U.S. Geographical Survey. Iron and steel statistics. [accessed November 2013]. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/iron_%26_steel/.
29. Xu T, Sathaye J, Galitsky C. Development of bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the iron and steel sector. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-4314E. [accessed November 2013. http://ies.lbl.gov/drupal.files/ies.lbl.gov.sandbox/4314E_0.pdf.
30. Webster MD. Uncertainty in future carbon emission: a preliminary exploration. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts; 1997.
31. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China; 2011.
32. China Steel Development Research Institute. China Steel Yearbook. China Steel Development Research Institute. China; 2011.
33. Indian Bureau of Mines. Indian minerals yearbook. [accessed November 2013]. http://ibm.nic.in/imyb2011.htm.
34. Bhushan C. Challenge of the new balance: a study of the six most emission intensive sectors to determine India's low carbon growth options 2010, Centre for Science and Environment, India.
35. Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook. ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/forecasting/0554(2011).pdf [accessed November 2013].
36. Bureau of International Recycling. World steel recycling in figures 2006-2010: steel scrap - a raw material for steelmaking. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.bir.org/assets/Documents/publications/brochures/aFerrousReportFinal2006-2010.pdf.
37. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Department of Labor. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.bls.gov/data/.
38. Firoz A.S. Mineral policy issues in the context of export and domestic use of iron ore in India 2008, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, India.
39. International Energy Agency. Petroleum product pricing in India - where have all the subsidies gone? [accessed November 2013]. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/name,3673,en.html.
40. International Energy Agency. Energy prices and taxes, quarterly statistics, 2nd quarter 2011. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.cne.es/cgi-bin/BRSCGI.exe?CMD=VEROBJ%26MLKOB=578594431818.
41. International Energy Agency-Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program. Iron and Steel, Technology Brief I02. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.iea-etsap.org/web/e-techds/pdf/i02-iron%26steel-gs-ad-gct.pdf.
42. In der Heiden PT. Chinese sectoral industrial policy shaping international trade and investment patterns - evidence from the iron and steel industry. Institute of East Asian Studies. [accessed November 2013. http://www.uni-due.de/in-east/fileadmin/publications/gruen/paper88.pdf.
43. International Maritime Organization. Second IMO GHG study 2009. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.imo.org/blast/blastDataHelper.asp?data_id=27795%26filename=GHGStudyFINAL.pdf.
44. Lin B., Jiang Z. Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform. Energy Econ 2011, 33:273-283.
45. Nill J. Technological competition, time, and windows of opportunity - the case of iron and steel production 2003, Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Berlin, Germany.
46. 2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector. Energy Econ 2007, 29:868-888.
47. Oda J., Akimoto K., Sano F., Tomoda T. Diffusion of CCS and energy efficient technologies in power and iron & steel sectors. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:155-161.
48. Sathaye J, De la Rue du Can S, Iyer M, McNeil M, Jan Kramer K, Roy J, Roy M, Chowdhury S. Strategies for low carbon growth in India: industry and non residential sectors. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [accessed November 2013. http://ies.lbl.gov/drupal.files/ies.lbl.gov.sandbox/Strategies%20for%20Low%20Carbon%20Growth%20in%20India.pdf.
49. Sathaye J, Xu T, Galitsky C. Bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the cement sector. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-4395E. [accessed November 2013. http://ies.lbl.gov/drupal.files/ies.lbl.gov.sandbox/Cement%20IAM%20FinalReport%202010-2011v4.pdf.
50. Zhou N, Fridley D, McNeil M, Zheng N, Ke J, Levine M. China's energy and carbon emission outlook to 2050. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-4472E. [accessed November 2013]. http://eaei.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/LBL_4472E_Energy_2050.April_.2011_1.pdf.
51. Aden N, Fridley D, Zheng N. China's coal: demand, constraints, and externalities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-2334E. [accessed November 2013]. http://china.lbl.gov/sites/china.lbl.gov/files/LBNL-2334E.pdf.
52. Brown H. Big ships to cut 70 capesize cargoes from Brazil trades. [accessed November 2013]. http://www.dvbbank.com/downloads/press_review/LloydsList22112010.pdf.
53. Wagner F, Sathaye J. Sharing the burden of climate change stabilization: an energy sector perspective. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-52911. [accessed November 2013]. http://ies.lbl.gov/iespubs/52911.pdf.
54. Karali N, Xu T, Sathaye J. Greenhouse gas mitigation options in ISEEM global energy model: scenario analysis for least-cost carbon reduction in iron and steel sector. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 2013, in press.
55. Energy Information Administration. U.S. electric power industry estimated emissions by state, back to 1990 (EIA-767 and EIA-906). [accessed November 2013]. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#elecenv.
56. Central Electricity Authority. Baseline carbon dioxide emissions from power sector. Government of India. Ministry of Power. [accessed November 2013]. http://cea.nic.in/reports/planning/cdm_co2/cdm_co2.htm.