Sustainability options in pulp and paper making: Costs of conserved energy and carbon reduction in the US

Sustainable Cities and Society

Volumn 8, Issue , 2013, Pages 56-62

  Xu, Tengfang ^a   Sathaye, Jayant ^a   Kramer, Klaas ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effective measures; Cost of carbon reduction; Cost of conserved energy; Energy efficiency; Pulp and paper; Sustainability option

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876053015     PISSN: 22106707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) National income and product accounts-NIPAs, section 1 all tables. GDP and other major NIPA aggregates 2011 US Department of Commerce http://www.bea.gov/
2. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 1994 manufacturing consumption of energy 1994 1997 The United States Department of Energy Washington, DC
3. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 1998 manufacturing consumption of energy 2001 The United States Department of Energy Washington, DC
4. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2002 manufacturing energy consumption survey on manufacturing and industrial energy uses and costs 2005 The United States Department of Energy Washington, DC http://www.eia.doe.gov/ emeu/mecs/mecs2002/data02/shelltables.html. Accessed June 2009.
5. Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2006 manufacturing energy consumption survey on manufacturing and industrial energy uses and costs 2009 The United States Department of Energy Washington, DC http://www.eia.doe.gov/ emeu/mecs/contents.html. Accessed July 2009.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). FAOSTAT, FAO statistics division 2011. http://faostat.fao.org/site/626/default. aspx#ancor. Accessed February 2011.
7. 2 emissions. http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/ tracking2007SUM.pdf.
8. Jacobs and IPST. (2006). Pulp and paper industry. Energy bandwidth study. Report for American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE). Atlanta: Jacobs Greenville and Institute of Paper Science and Technology (IPST) at Georgia Institute of Technology.
9. ® guide for energy and plant managers. LBNL-2268E. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
10. Martin, N.; Anglani, N.; Einstein, D.; Khrushch, M.; Worrell, E.; & Price, L. K. (2000). Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the US pulp and paper industry. Report LBNL-46141. Berkeley, California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
11. A.K. Meier The cost of conserved energy as an investment statistic Sixth annual industrial energy technology conference. Vol. 2 Houston, TX, USA, April 1984
12. Sathaye, J.; Xu, T.; & Galitsky, C. (2010). Bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the cement sector. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report, LBNL-4395E.
13. Schipper, M. (2006). 2002 energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in US manufacturing. Energy Information Administration (EIA) report #: DOE/EIA-0573 (2005). http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/pdf/industry-mecs.pdf.
14. Stoft, S. (1996). The economics of conserved-energy supply curves. POWER. PWP-028. Berkeley: University of California.
15. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2008). Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2006. 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC.
16. E. Worrell, J.A. Laitner, M. Ruth, and H. Finman Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures Energy 28 2003 1081 1098
17. Xu, T.; Sathaye, J.; & Galitsky, C. (2010). Development of bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the iron and steel sector, Climate Economics Branch, Climate Change Division, US Environmental Protection Agency. LBNL-4314E. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
18. Xu, T.; Sathaye, J.; & Kramer, K. (2012). Development of bottom-up representation of industrial energy efficiency technologies in integrated assessment models for the pulp and paper sector. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report, LBNL-5801E.