Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 747-752

  Mu, Ju Wei ^a   Yuan, Zu Yang ^a   Zhang, Bai Hua ^a   Li, Ning ^a   Lyu, Fang ^a   Mao, You Sheng ^a   Xue, Qi ^a   Gao, Shu Geng ^a   Zhao, Jun ^a   Wang, Da Li ^a   Zhi, Shan Li ^a   Gao, Yu Shun ^a   Zhang, Liang Ze ^a   Huang, Jin Feng ^a   Shao, Kang ^a   Feng, Fei Yue ^a   Zhao, Liang ^a   Li, Jian ^a   Cheng, Gui Yu ^a   Sun, Ke Lin ^a   He, Jie ^a   more..

^a CANCER HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive; Surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PROCEDURES; THORACOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; THORACOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84894091673     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132224     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
2. He J. Standardization of diagnosis and treatment is the only way to promote the eesophageal cancer treatment and research in China (in Chinese). Chin J Oncol 2012; 34: 241-244.
3. Connors RC, Reuben BC, Neumayer LA, Bull DA. Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205: 735-740.
4. Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O'Brien SM, Grab JD, Allen MS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 587-596.
5. Ping Y, He M, Meng X, Bai S, Chen X, Liu Q, et al. Prevention and treatment of complications after surgical resection for esophageal and gastric cardiac cancers (in Chinese). Natl Med J China 2009; 89: 296-300.
6. Zhang DW, Cheng GY, Huang GJ, Zhang RG, Liu XY, Mao YS, et al. Operable squamous esophageal cancer: current results from the East. World J Surg 1994; 18: 347-354.
7. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 7-11.
8. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 486-495.
9. Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decaluwé H, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40: 1455-1463.
10. Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Lanuti M, Allan JS, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 430-437.
11. Chen BF, Zhu CC, Wang CG, Ma DH, Lin J, Zhang B, et al. Clinical comparative study of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (in Chinese). Chin J Surg 2010; 48: 1206-1209.
12. Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, Yaguchi Y, Kumano I, Matsumoto Y, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications. Surgery 2012; 151: 667-673.
13. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892.
14. Mu JW, Chen GY, Sun KL, Wang DW, Zhang BH, Li N, et al. Application of video-assisted thoracic surgery in the standard operation for thoracic tumors. Cancer Biol Med 2013; 10: 28-35.
15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 373-383.
16. Edge SB, Byrd DB, Compton CC. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2010: 129-144.
17. Berger AC, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, Evans N, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 560-566.
18. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 911-919.
19. Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 594-598.
20. Li H, Hu B, You B, Miao JB, Fu YL, Chen QR. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China. Chin Med J 2012; 125: 1376-1380.
21. Müller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 845-857.
22. Sunpaweravong S, Ruangsin S, Laohawiriyakamol S, Mahattanobon S, Geater A. Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients. Asian J Surg 2012; 35: 104-109.
23. Bakhos CT, Fabian T, Oyasiji TO, Gautam S, Gangadharan SP, Kent MS, et al. Impact of the surgical technique on pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 221-227.
24. Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 1154-1161.
25. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: metaanalysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3031-3040.
26. Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 486-494.
27. Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 768-776.
28. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, Luketich JD. The best operation for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: S2163-S2167.
29. Lee L, Sudarshan M, Li C, Latimer E, Fried GM, Mulder DS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3732-3739.