Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 430-437

  Sihag, Smita ^a   Wright, Cameron D ^a   Wain, John C ^a   Gaissert, Henning A ^a   Lanuti, Michael ^a   Allan, James S ^a   Mathisen, Douglas J ^a   Morse, Christopher R ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive; Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

INFUSION FLUID;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER STAGING; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; CANCER INVASION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL;

AGED; BOSTON; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; OPERATIVE TIME; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84872674474     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: 1873734X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs031     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1170-6.
2. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, Luketich JD. The "best operation" for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:S2163-7.
3. Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:S2159-62.
4. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:402-6.
5. Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635-43.
6. Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V. Prediction of major pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1494-500.
7. Reynolds JV, Ravi N, Hollywood D, Kennedy MJ, Rowley S, Ryan A et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation may increase the risk of respiratory complications and sepsis after transthoracic esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:549-55.
8. Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 1946;34:18-31.
9. Levy RM, Wizorek J, Shende M, Luketich JD. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Adv Surg 2010;44:101-16.
10. Campos GM, Jablons D, Brown LM, Ramirez RM, Rabl C, Theodore P. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the transoral anvil. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:1421-6.
11. Avendano CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, King LB, Reed CE. Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:922-6.
12. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:791-800.
13. Atkins BZ, D'Amico TA. Respiratory complications after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2006;16:35-48.
14. Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O, Grande L. Epidemiology of esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;92:151-9.
15. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD, Chow WB, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ. Use of multimodality neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States: assessment of 987 hospitals. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19: 357-64.
16. Pennathur A, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ, Ward J, Christie NA, Gibson MK et al. Long-term results of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal neoplasm. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1930-6.
17. Parameswaran R, Blazeby JM, Hughes R, Mitchell K, Berrisford RG, Wajed SA. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2010;97:525-31.
18. Darling G. The role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009;99:189-93.
19. Yu E, Tai P, Malthaner R, Stitt L, Rodrigues G, Dar R et al. What are the factors that predict outcome at relapse after previous esophagectomy and adjuvant therapy in high-risk esophageal cancer? Curr Oncol 2010; 17:46-51.
20. Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 2009;64:121-33.
21. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2009;64: 135-46.
22. Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decaluwé H, Decker G, De Leyn P et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastrooesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40: 1455-64.
23. Song SY, Na KJ, Oh SG, Ahn BH. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:689-93.
24. Grotenhuis BA, Wijnhoven BP, Grüne F, van Bommel J, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients with esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:270-8.
25. Nagawa H, Kobori O, Muto T. Prediction of pulmonary complications after transthoracic esophagectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:860-2.
26. Nishi M, Hiramatsu Y, Hioki K, Hatano T, Yamamoto M. Pulmonary complications after subtotal esophagectomy. Br J Surg 1988;75:527-30.
27. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 2011;11:2.