Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 199, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 594-598

  Pham, Thai H ^a   Perry, Kyle A ^b   Dolan, James P ^a   Schipper, Paul ^a   Sukumar, Mithran ^a   Sheppard, Brett C ^a   Hunter, John G ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Esophagectomy; Ivor lewis esophagectomy; Minimally invasive; Perioperative morbidity

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS ACHALASIA; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS DISEASE; ESOPHAGUS FISTULA; ESOPHAGUS INJURY; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; ESOPHAGUS STRICTURE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PALSY; SPLEEN INJURY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRACHEA INJURY; WOUND COMPLICATION; WOUND INFECTION;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT STUDIES; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL RATE; THORACOSCOPY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951916809     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus. With special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 34 (1946) 18-31
2. Atkins B., Shah A., Hutcheson K., et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78 (2004) 1170-1176
3. Smithers B.M., Gotley D.C., Martin I., et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245 (2007) 232-240
4. Luketich J.D., Alvelo-Rivera M., Buenaventura P.O., et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238 (2003) 486-494
5. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system, 2008. http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm Accessed: October 2009
6. Fleisher L.A., Beckman J.A., Brown K.A., et al., American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to update the 2002 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery). ACC/AHA 2006 guideline update on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: focused update on perioperative beta-blocker therapy. Circulation 113 (2006) 2662-2674
7. Perry K.A., Enestvedt C.K., Diggs B.S., et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably to those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 23 (2009) 2147-2154
8. Jobe B.A., Reavis K.M., Davis J.J., et al. Laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy: simplifying a daunting operation. Dis Esophagus 17 (2004) 95-97
9. Jobe B.A., Kim C.Y., Minjarez R.C., et al. Simplifying minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy with the inversion approach: lessons learned from the first 20 cases. Arch Surg 141 (2006) 857-866
10. Orringer M.B., Marshall B., and Iannettoni M.D. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119 (2000) 277-288
11. Parameswaran R., Veeramootoo D., Krishnadas R., et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 33 (2009) 1868-1875
12. Nguyen N.T., Follette D.M., Wolfe B.M., et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135 (2000) 920-925
13. Groth S.S., Virnig B.A., Whitson B.A., et al. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the surveillance epidemiology and end results database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 (2009) 612-620
14. Greenstein A.J., Litle V.R., Swanson S.J., et al. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer 112 (2008) 1239-1246
15. Eloubeidi M.A., Desmond R., Arguedas M.R., et al. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 95 (2002) 1434-1443