Vegetable waste as substrate and source of suitable microflora for bio-hydrogen production

Renewable Energy

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 6-13

  Marone, Antonella ^a   Izzo, Giulio ^a   Mentuccia, Luciano ^a   Massini, Giulia ^a   Paganin, Patrizia ^a   Rosa, Silvia ^a   Varrone, Cristiano ^a   Signorini, Antonella ^a  

^a ENEA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bio hydrogen production; Facultative anaerobes; H2 producing bacteria; Self fermentation; Vegetable waste

Indexed keywords

FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; METHANE; SUBSTRATES; VEGETABLES;

ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; BIO-HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; CELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES; FACULTATIVE ANAEROBES; GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATIONS; VEGETABLE WASTES;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

BIOASSAY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS POWER; CELLULOSE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FERMENTATION; GAS PRODUCTION; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; LEAFY VEGETABLE; METHANE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; OXIC CONDITIONS; PLANT RESIDUE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; FIRMICUTES; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; LACTOCOCCUS; PECTOBACTERIUM; RAHNELLA; RAOULTELLA; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; STREPTOCOCCACEAE;

EID: 84894084786     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Benemann J. Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects. Nat Biotechnol 1996, 14:1101-1103.
2. Kim D.H., Kim S.H., Shin H.S. Hydrogen fermentation of food waste without inoculum addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 2009, 45:181-187.
3. Ohnishi A., Bando Y., Fujimoto N., Suzuki M. Development of a simple bio-hydrogen production system through dark fermentation by using unique microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:8544-8553.
4. Gilroyed B.H., Chang C., Chu A., Hao X. Effect of temperature on anaerobic fermentative hydrogen gas production from feedlot cattle manure using mixed microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:4301-4308.
5. Yokoyama H., Waki M., Moriya N., Yasuda T., Tanaka Y., Haga K. Effect of fermentation temperature on hydrogen production from cow waste slurry by using anaerobic microflora within the slurry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 74:474-483.
6. Stamatelatou K., Antonopoulou G., Tremouli A., Lyberato G. Production of gaseous biofuels and electricity from cheese whey. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011, 50:639-644.
7. Kim D.H., Kim S.H., Jung K.W., Kim M.S., Shin H.S. Effect of initial pH independent of operational pH on hydrogen fermentation of food waste. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8646-8652.
8. Shimizu S., Fujisawa A., Mizuno O., Kameda T., Yoshioka T. Fermentative hydrogen production from food waste without inocula. AIP Conf Proc 2008, 987:171-174.
9. Antonopoulou G., Stamatelatou K., Venetsaneas N., Kornaros M., Lyberatos G. Biohydrogen and methane production from cheese whey in a two-stage anaerobic process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008, 5227-5233.
10. Wang X., Zhao Y. Abench scale study of fermentative hydrogen and methane production from food waste in integrated two-stage process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:245-254.
11. Yokoyama H., Waki M., Ogino A., Ohmori H., Tanaka Y. Hydrogen fermentation properties of undiluted cow dung. JBiosci Bioeng 2007, 104:82-85.
12. Sittijunda S., Reunggsang A., O-thong S. Biohydrogen production from dual digestion pretreatment of poultry slaughterhouse sludge by anaerobic self-fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:13427-13434.
13. Xiao B., Liu J. Biological hydrogen production from sterilized sewage sludge by anaerobic self-fermentation. JHazard Mater 2009, 168:163-167.
14. Antonopoulou G., Gavala H.N., Skiadas I.V., Angelopoulos K., Lyberato S. Biofuels generation from sweet sorghum: fermentative hydrogen production and anaerobic digestion of the remaining biomass. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:110-111.
15. Antonopoulou G., Gavala H.N., Skiadas I.V., Lyberatos G. Effect of substrate concentration on fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:4843-4851.
16. Cai M., Liu J., Wei Y. Enhanced biohydrogen production from sewage sludge with alkaline pretreatment. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38:3195-3202.
17. Xing Y., Li Z., Fan Y., Hou H. Biohydrogen production from dairy manures with acidification pretreatment by anaerobic fermentation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2010, 17:392-399.
18. Dong L., Zhenhong Y., Yongming S., Xiaoying K., Yu Z. Hydrogen production characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by anaerobic mixed culture fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:812-820.
19. Shin H.S., Kim S.H., Paik B.C. Characteristics of hydrogen production from food waste activated sludge. JWater Environ Technol 2003, 1:177-187.
20. Zhao Y., Chen Y., Zhang D., Zhu X. Waste activated sludge fermentation for hydrogen production enhanced by anaerobic process improvement and acetobacteria inhibition: the role of fermentation pH. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:3317-3323.
21. Kim D.H., Wu J., Jeong K.W., Kim M.S., Shin H.S. Natural inducement of hydrogen from food waste by temperature control. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:10666-10673.
22. Hung C.H., Chang Y.T., Chang Y.J. Roles of microorganisms other than Clostrdium and Enterobacter in anaerobic fermentative biohydrogen production systems - a review. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8437-8444.
23. Pakarinen O., Kaparaju P., Rintala J. The effect of organic loading rate and retention time on hydrogen production from a methanogenic CSTR. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8952-8957.
24. Perera K.R.J., Ketheesan B., Gadhamshetty V., Nirmalakhandan N. Fermentative biohydrogen production: evaluation of the net energy gain. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:12224-12233.
25. Lin C.Y., Lay C.H. Effects of carbonate and phosphate concentrations on hydrogen production using anaerobic sewage sludge microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003, 29:275-281.
26. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA.
27. Pan C.M., Fan Y.T., Xing Y., Hou H.W., Zhang M.L. Statistical optimization of process parameters on bio-hydrogen production from glucose by Clostridium sp. Fanp2. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:3146-3154.
28. Vandamme P., Henry D., Coenye T., Nzula S., Vancanneyt M., LiPuma J.J., et al. Burkholderia anthina sp. nov. and Burkholderia pyrrocinia, two additional Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria, may confound results of new molecular diagnostic tools. FEMS Med Microbiol Immun 2002, 33:143-149.
29. Di Cello F., Bevivino A., Chiarini L., Fani R., Paffetti D., Tabacchioni S., et al. Biodiversity of a Burkholderia cepacia population isolated from the maize rhizosphere at different plant growth stages. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63:4485-4493.
30. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24:1596-1599.
31. 2 by Bacillus licheniformis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1994, 10:224-227.
32. Logan B.E., Oh S.E., Kim I.S., Van Ginkel S. Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:2530-2535.
33. Chen W.H., Chen S.Y., Khanal S., Sung S. Kinetic study of biological hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006, 3:2170-2178.
34. Varrone C., Giussani B., Izzo G., Massini G., Marone A., Signorini A., et al. Statistical optimization of biohydrogen and ethanol production from crude glycerol by microbial mixed culture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:16479-16488.
35. Motte J.-C., Escudié R., Bernet N., Delgenes J.-P., Steyer J.-P., Dumas C. Dynamic effect of total solid content, low substrate/inoculum ratio and particle size on solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 2013, 144:141-148.
36. Li Yeqing, Zhang Ruihong, Liu Xiaoying, Chen Chang, Xiao Xiao, Feng Lu, et al. Evaluating methane production from anaerobic mono- and codigestion of kitchen waste, corn stover, and chicken manure. Energy Fuels 2013, 27:2085-2091.
37. Raposo F., Borja R., Martín M.A., Martín A., de la Rubia M.A., Rincón B. Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem Eng J 2009, 149:70-77.
38. Lu F., Shao L.-M., Bru V., Godon J.-J., He P.-J. Synergetic effect of pH and biochemical components on bacterial diversity during mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of biomass-origin waste. JAppl Microbiol 2009, 106:580-591.
39. Don J.J.B., Krieg N.R., Staley J.T., Garrity G.M., Boone D.R., De Vos P., et al. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology 2005, Springer. 2nd ed.
40. Jayasinghearachchi H.S., Sarma P.M., Singh S., Aginihotri A., Mandal A.K., Lal B. Fermentative hydrogen production by two novel strains of Enterobacter aerogenes HGN-2 and HT 34 isolated from sea buried crude oil pipelines. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7197-7207.
41. Zhua D., Wanga G., Qiao H., Cai J. Fermentative hydrogen production by the new marine Pantoea agglomerans isolated from the mangrove sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:6116-6123.
42. Oh Y.K., Seol E.H., Kim J.R., Park S. Fermentative biohydrogen production by a new chemoheterotrophic bacterium Citrobacter sp Y19. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28:1353-1359.
43. Castelló E., Perna V., Wenzel J., Borzacconi L., Etchebehere C. Microbial community composition and reactor performance during hydrogen production in a UASB reactor fed with raw cheese whey inoculated with compost. JWater Sci Technol 2011, 64:2265-2273.
44. Yang P., Zhang R., McGarvey J.A., Benemann J.R. Biohydrogen production from cheese processing wastewater by anaerobic fermentation using mixed microbial communities. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:4761-4771.
45. Castello E., Santos C.G., Iglesias T., Paolino G., Wenzel J., Borzacconi L., et al. Feasibility of biohydrogen production from cheese whey using a UASB reactor: links between microbial community and reactor performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:5674-5682.
46. Hafez H., Nakhla G., Hesham El.Naggar M., Elbeshbishy E., Baghchehsaraee B. Effect of organic loading on a novel hydrogen bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:81-92.
47. Hallenbeck P.C. Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7379-7389.
48. Ito T., Nakashimada Y., Senba K., Matsui T., Nishio N. Hydrogen and ethanol production from glycerol-containing wastes discharged after biodiesel manufacturing process. JBiosci Bioeng 2005, 100:260-265.
49. Marone A., Massini G., Patriarca C., Signorini A., Varrone C., Izzo G. Hydrogen production from vegetable waste by bioaugmentation of indigenous fermentative communities. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:5612-5622.
50. D'Ippolito G., Dipascuale L., Vella F.M., Romano I., Gambacorta A., Cutignano A., et al. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:2290-2295.
51. Wang J.L., Wan W. The effect of substrate concentration on biohydrogen production by using kinetic models. Sci China Chem 2008, 51:1110-1117.
52. Fangkum A., Reungsang A. Biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by elephant dung. Effects of initial pH and substrate concentration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:8687-8696.
53. Kongjan P., Min B., Angelidaki I. Biohydrogen production from xylose at extreme thermophilic temperature (70°C) by mixed culture fermentation. Water Res 2009, 43:1414-1424.
54. Jungare M., Subudhi S., Lal B. Improvement of hydrogen production under decreased partial pressure by newly isolated alkaline tolerant anaerobe, Clostridium butyricum TM-94: optimization of process parameter. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:3160-3168.
55. Van Niel E., Claassen P., Stams A. Substrate and product inhibition of hydrogen production by the extreme thermophile, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003, 81:255-262.