Recent admixture generates heterozygosity-fitness correlations during the range expansion of an invading species

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 616-627

  Keller, S R ^a   Fields, P D ^b   Berardi, A E ^b   Taylor, D R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Heterosis; Hybridization; Introgression; Invasion; Silene

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; HETEROZYGOTE; INTRODUCED SPECIES;

BAYES THEOREM; HETEROZYGOTE; INTRODUCED SPECIES;

EID: 84894071421     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12330     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alho, J.S., Välimäki, K. & Merilä, J. 2010. Rhh: an R extension for estimating multilocus heterozygosity and heterozygosity-heterozygosity correlation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10: 720-722.
2. Amos, W., Wilmer, J.W., Fullard, K., Burg, T.M., Croxall, J.P., Bloch, D. et al. 2001. The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268: 2021-2027.
3. Aparicio, J.M., Ortego, J. & Cordero, P.J. 2006. What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci? Mol. Ecol. 15: 4659-4665.
4. Calsbeek, B., Lavergne, S., Patel, M. & Molofsky, J. 2011. Comparing the genetic architecture and potential response to selection of invasive and native populations of reed canary grass. Evol. Appl. 4: 726-735.
5. Chapman, J.R., Nakagawa, S., Coltman, D.W., Slates, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2009. A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2746-2765.
6. Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 783-796.
7. Colautti, R.I. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2011. Population divergence along lines of genetic variance and covariance in the invasive plant Lythrum salicaria in eastern North America. Evolution 65: 2514-2529.
8. Coltman, D.W., Pilkington, J.G., Smith, J.A. & Pemberton, J.M. 1999. Parasite-ediated selection against inbred Soay Sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 53: 1259-1267.
9. Cornuet, J.-M., Santos, F., Beaumont, M.A., Robert, C.P., Marin, J.-M., Balding, D.J. et al. 2008. Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics 24: 2713-2719.
10. Cornuet, J.-M., Ravigne, V. & Estoup, A. 2010. Inference on population history and model checking using DNA sequence and microsatellite data with the software DIYABC (v1.0). BMC Bioinformatics 11: 401.
11. David, P. 1998. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80: 531-537.
12. Dlugosch, K.M. & Parker, I.M. 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17: 431-449.
13. Drake, J.M. 2006. Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird. Biol. Lett. 2: 304-307.
14. Earl, D. & vonHoldt, B. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4: 359-361.
15. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1768.
16. Ellstrand, N.C. & Schierenbeck, K.A. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 7043-7050.
17. Estoup, A., Lombaert, E., Marin, J.-M., Guillemaud, T., Pudlo, P., Robert, C.P. et al. 2012. Estimation of demo-genetic model probabilities with Approximate Bayesian Computation using linear discriminant analysis on summary statistics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 12: 846-855.
18. Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620.
19. Excoffier, L., Foll, M. & Petit, R.J. 2009. Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 481-501.
20. Facon, B., Jarne, P., Pointier, J.P. & David, P. 2005. Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 524-535.
21. Facon, B., Hufbauer, R.A., Tayeh, A., Loiseau, A., Lombaert, E., Vitalis, R. et al. 2011. Inbreeding depression is purged in the invasive insect Harmonia axyridis. Curr. Biol. 21: 424-427.
22. Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J.K. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
23. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Eldridge, M.D.B., Lacy, R.C., Ralls, K., Dudash, M.R. et al. 2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 25: 465-475.
24. Hansson, B. & Westerberg, L. 2002. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2467-2474.
25. Hewitt, G.M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 247-276.
26. Hufbauer, R.A. 2008. Biological invasions: Paradox lost and paradise gained. Curr. Biol. 18: R246-R247.
27. Ingvarsson, P. 2001. Restoration of genetic variation lost - The genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 62-63.
28. Jakobsson, M. & Rosenberg, N.A. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801-1806.
29. Juillet, N., Freymond, H., Degen, L. & Goudet, J. 2003. Isolation and characterization of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in the bladder campion, Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 3: 358-359.
30. Keller, S.R. & Taylor, D.R. 2010. Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1720-1731.
31. Keller, L. & Waller, D. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
32. Keller, S.R., Sowell, D.R., Neiman, M., Wolfe, L.M. & Taylor, D.R. 2009. Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species. New Phytol. 183: 678-690.
33. Keller, S.R., Gilbert, K.J., Fields, P.D. & Taylor, D.R. 2012. Bayesian inference of a complex invasion history revealed by nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity in the colonizing plant, Silene latifolia. Mol. Ecol. 21: 4721-4734.
34. Kolbe, J.J., Glor, R.E., Rodriguez-Schettino, L., Chamizo-Lara, A., Larson, A. & Losos, J.B. 2004. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177-181.
35. Lambrinos, J.G. 2004. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85: 2061-2070.
36. Lee, C.E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 386-391.
37. Lynch, M. 1991. The Genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
38. Lynch, M. & Walsh, J.B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
39. Martindale, I.C. 1876. The introduction of foreign plants. Bot. Gaz. 2: 55-58.
40. Matschiner, M. & Salzburger, W. 2009. TANDEM: integrating automated allele binning into genetics and genomics workflows. Bioinformatics 25: 1982-1983.
41. Moccia, M.D., Oger-Desfeux, C., Marais, G.A. & Widmer, A. 2009. A White Campion (Silene latifolia) floral expressed sequence tag (EST) library: annotation, EST-SSR characterization, transferability, and utility for comparative mapping. BMC Genomics 10: 243.
42. Petit, R.J., Aguinagalde, I., de Beaulieu, J.-L., Bittkau, C., Brewer, S., Cheddadi, R. et al. 2003. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300: 1563-1565.
43. Pritchard, J., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
44. Pursh, F. 1814. Flora Americae Septentrionalis. White, London.
45. R Development Core Team 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
46. Reznick, D.N. & Ghalambor, C.K. 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112: 183-198.
47. Richards, C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155: 383-394.
48. Rosenberg, N.A. 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 137-138.
49. Salamin, N., Wuest, R.O., Lavergne, S., Thuiller, W. & Pearman, P.B. 2010. Assessing rapid evolution in a changing environment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 692-698.
50. Szulkin, M., Bierne, N. & David, P. 2010. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64: 1202-1217.
51. Taylor, D.R. & Keller, S.R. 2007. Historical range expansion determines the phylogenetic diversity introduced during contemporary species invasion. Evolution 61: 334-345.
52. Turgeon, J., Tayeh, A., Facon, B., Lombaert, E., De Clercq, P., Berkvens, N. et al. 2011. Experimental evidence for the phenotypic impact of admixture between wild and biocontrol Asian ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) involved in the European invasion. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1044-1052.
53. Verhoeven, K.J.F., Macel, M., Wolfe, L.M. & Biere, A. 2011. Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278: 2-8.