Comparison of two techniques for measuring leaf water potential in vitis vinifera var. Albariño

Ciencia e Tecnica Vitivinicola

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 29-41

  Martinez E M ^a   Rey, B J ^a   Fandino M ^a   Cancela, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Correlation; Fertigation; Scholander pressure chamber; Water activity meter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894044226     PISSN: 02540223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Acevedo-Opazo C., Valdés-Gómez H., Taylor J.A., Avalo A., Verdugo-Vásqueza N. Araya M., Jara-Rojas F., Tisseyre B., 2013. Assessment of an empirical spatial prediction model of vine water status for irrigation management in a grapevine field. Agr. Water Manage., 124, 58-68
2. Afonso J.M., Monteiro A.M., Lopes C.M., Lourenço J., 2003. Enrelvamento do solo em vinha na região dos vinhos verdes. Três anos de estudo na casta 'Alvarinho'. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 18, 47-63
3. Améglio T., Archer P., Cohen M., Valancogne C., Daudet F.A., Dayau S., Cruiziat P., 1999. Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation. Plant Soil, 207, 155-167
4. Barbeau G., Bournand S., Champenois R., Bouvet M.H., Blin A., Cosneau M., 2004. Comportement de quatre cépages rouges du Val de Loire en fonction des variables climatiques. J Int Sci Vigne Vin, 38, 35-40
5. Barrs H.D., 1964. Heat of respirations as a possible cause of error in the estimation by psychrometric methods of water potential in plant tissue. Nature, 203, 1136-1137
6. Barrs H.D., 1968. Determination of water deficits in plant tissues. In: Water deficits and plant growth. Vol. I. Development control and measurements., 235-368. Kozlowski T.T. (ed), Academic Press, New York
7. Botella O., Campos I., 2005. Las relaciones agua-planta. In: Agua y Agronomía. 87-161. Martín F., López P., Calera A. (eds), Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid
8. Boyer J.S., 1967. Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiol., 42, 133-137
9. Boyer J.S., Knipling E.B., 1965. Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 54, 1044-1051
10. Bravdo B., Naor A., 1997. Effect of water regime on productivity and quality of fruit and wine. Acta Hortic., 427, 15-26
11. Brown P.W., Tanner C.B., 1981. Alfalfa water potential measurements: a comparison of the pressure chamber and leaf dew-point hygrometers. Crop Sci., 21, 240-244
12. Busso C.A., 2008. Uso de la cámara de presión y los psicrómetros a termocupla en la determinación de las relaciones hídricas en tejidos vegetales. Phyton, 77, 327-350
13. Cancela J.J., 2004. Gestión integrada del agua en la Cuenca alta del río Miño. 466 p. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
14. Cancela J.J., Dafonte J., Martínez E.M., Cuesta T.S., Neira X.X., 2006. Assessment of a water activity meter for rapid measurements of soil water potential. Biosyst Eng., 94, 285-295
15. Campbell C.S., McInnes K.J., 1999. Response of in situ leaf psychrometer to cuticle removal by abrasion. Agron. J., 91, 859-862
16. Campbell G.S., 1985. Instruments for measuring plant water potential and its components. In: Instrumentation for environmental physiology. 193-214. Marshall B., Wodward F.I(eds.), University Press, Cambridge, England
17. Carbonneau A., 1998. Aspects in qualitatifs. In: Traté d́irrigation. 258-276. Tiercelin J.R. (ed.), Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris
18. Carbonneau A., Costanza P., 2004. Response of vine leaf water potential to quick variation in canopy exposure. Example of canopy opening manipulation of Merlot (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 38, 27-33
19. Cardoso R., Romero E., Lima A., Ferrari A., 2007. A comparative study of soil suction measurement using two different high-range psychrometers. In: Experimental unsatured soil mechanics. Vol. 112. Part. I. 79-93. Schanz, T. (ed.), Springer, Berlin
20. Chalmers Y.M., Krstic M.P., Downey M.O., Loveys B.R., Dry P.R., 2007. Physiological mechanism used by grapevine varieties to cope with water deficit. Acta Hort., 754, 495-499
21. Chapman D.M., Roby G., Ebeler S.E., Guinard J.X., Matthews M.A., 2005. Sensory attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon wines made from vines with different water status. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 11, 339-347
22. Cholpankulov E.D., Inchenkova O.P., Paredes P., Pereira L.S., 2008. Cotton irrigation scheduling in Central Asia: Model calibration and validation with consideration of groundwater contribution. Irrig. Drain., 57, 516-532
23. Choné X., van Leeuwen C., Dubordieu D., Gaudillère J.P. 2001. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Ann. Bot., 87, 477-483
24. Decagon Device, 2000. Operatoŕs manual WP4 Dewpoint PotentiaMeter. 70 p. Decagon Devices, Inc., USA
25. Deloire A., Carbonneau A., Wang Z., Ojeda H., 2004. Vine and water: a short review. J. Int. Sci. Vin., 38, 1-13
26. Deloire A., Ferrer M., Carbonneau A., 2003. Respuestas de la viña al terroir. Elementos para un método de estudio. Agrociencia, VII, 105-113
27. Díaz-Zorita M., Grove J.H., Murdock L., Herbeck J., Perfect E., 2004. Soil structural disturbance effects on crop yields and soil properties in a no-till production system. Agron. J., 96, 1651-1659
28. Duniway J.M., 1971. Comparison of pressure chamber and the thermocouple psychrometer determinations of leaf water status in tomato. Plant Physiol., 48, 106-107
29. Escalona J.M., Fuentes S., Tomás M., Martorell S., Flexas J., Medrano H., 2013. Responses of leaf night transpiration to drought stress in Vitis vinifera L. Agr. Water Manage., 118, 50-58
30. Fandiño M., Cancela J.J., Rey B.J., Martínez E.M., Rosa R.G., Pereira L.S., 2012. Using the dual-Kc approach to model evapotranspiration of Albariño vineyards (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Albariño) with consideration of active ground cover. Agr. Water Manage., 112, 75-87
31. Ferreyra R., Selles G., Maldonado P., Celedón A., Gil P., 2007. Efecto del clima, de las características de la hoja y de la metodología de medición en el potencial hídrico xilemático en Palto (Persea americana Mill.). Agric. Téc., 67, 182-188
32. Ferreyra R., Selles G., Peralta J., Burgos L., Valenzuela J., 2002. Efectos de la restricción del riego en distintos periodos de desarrollo de la vid cv. Cabernet Sauvignon sobre producción y calidad del vino. Agric. Téc., 62, 406-417
33. Ferreyra R., Selles G., Silva H., Ahumada R., Muñoz I., Muñoz V., 2006. Efecto del agua aplicada en las relaciones hídricas y productividad de la vid 'Crimson seedless'. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. Brasília, 41, 1109-1118
34. Fredlund D.G., Rahardjo H., Fredlund M.D., 2012. Unsatured soil mechanics in engineering practice. 926 p. John Wiley & Sons, USA
35. Gee G.W., Campbell M.D., Campbell G.S., Campbell J.H., 1992. Rapid measurement of low soil water potentials using a water activity meter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1068-1070
36. Ghaderi N., Siosemardeh A., Shahoei S., 2007. The effect of water stress on some physiological characteristics in 'Rashe' and 'Khoshnave' grape cultivars. Acta Hort., 754, 317-322
37. Giorgessi F., Calò A., Sansone L., 1998. Importanza dell'irrigazione per la qualità del prodotto ed influenza di alcune tecniche colturali sul fabbisogno idrico della cv. Cabernet sauvignon, nell'ambiente dell'Italia nordorientale. Riv. Vitc. Eno. 4, 3-12
38. Girona J., Mata M., del Campo J., Arbonés A., Bartra E., Marsal J. 2006. The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig. Sci., 24, 115-127
39. Green S., Dryden G., Neal S., Davidson P., Martin D., Neal M., Clothier B., 2003. The effect of reduced irrigation on yield and quality of Sauvignon Blanc grapes in Marlborough. Grapegrower & Winemaker, 474, 101-104
40. Hidalgo J., 2006. La calidad del vino desde el viñedo. 389 p. Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid
41. Hidalgo L., 1993. Tratado de viticultura general. 983 p. Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid
42. Intrigliolo D., Castel J.R., Chirivella C., 2007a. Response of grapevine cv. 'Tempranillo' to irrigation amount and partial rootzone drying under contrasting crop load levels. Acta Hort., 754, 309-316
43. Intrigliolo D., Ferrer P.J., Castel J.R., 2007b. Monitorización del riego en vid. In: Fundamentos, aplicación y consecuencias del riego en la vid. 83-113. Baeza P., Lissarrague J.R., Sánchez, P., (eds.), Ed. Agrícola, S.A., Madrid
44. Itier B., Katerji N., Flura D., Ferreira I., 1990. Relative evapotranspiration in relation to soil water deficit and predawn leaf water potential. Application to tomato crop. Acta Hort., 278, 101-111
45. Jackson D., Lombart P., 1993. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality. A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 44, 409-430
46. Johnson L.F., Herwitza S., Dunagana S., Lobitza B., Sullivan D., Slye R., 2003. Collection of ultra high spatial and spectral resolution image data over California vineyards with a small UAV. In: Proc 30th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment. CD paper TS-12.4, Honolulu
47. Katerji N., van Hoorn J.W., Hamdy A., Mastrorilli M., 2000. Salt tolerance classification of crops according to soil salinity and to water stress day index. Agric. Water Manage., 43, 99-109
48. Kikuta S.B., Kyriakopoulous E., Richter H., 1985. Leaf hygrometer v. pressure chamber: a comparison of pressurevolume curve data obtained on single leaves by alternating measurements. Plant Cell Environ., 8, 363-367
49. Kirkham M.B., 2005. Principles of soil and plant water relations. 500 p. Elsevier Academic Press, New York
50. Klepper B., Barrs H.D., 1968. Effects of salt secretion on psychrometic determinations of water potential of cotton leaves. Plant Physiol., 43, 1138-1140
51. Kondo S., Kittikorn M., Ohara H., Okawa K., Sugaya S., Kitahata N., Asami T., 2009. Effect of a cytochrome P450 inhibitor on abscisic acid biosynthesis and stomatal regulation in citrus trees in water-stressed conditions. Sci. Hort., 120, 146-149
52. Lechaudel M., Vercambre G., Lescourret F., Normand F., Génard M., 2007. An analysis of elastic and plastic fruit growth of mango in response to various assimilate supplies. Tree Physiol., 27, 219-230
53. Livingston N.J., Topp G.C., 2006. Soil water potential. In: Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 963-979. Carter M.R., Gregorich G., (eds.), Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
54. Londers E., Ceusters J., Vervaeke I., Deroose R., de Proft M.P., 2005. Organic acid analysis and plant water status of two Aechmea cultivars grown under greenhouse conditions: implications on leaf quality. Sci. Hort., 105, 249-262
55. Lopes C.M., Monteiro A., Machado J.P., Fernandes N., Araújo A., 2008. Cover cropping in a slopping non-irrigated vineyard: II - effects on vegetative growth, yield, berry and wine quality of 'cabernet sauvignon' grapevines. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 23, 37-43
56. Maggio A., Raimondi G., Martino A., De Pascale S., 2007. Salt stress response in tomato beyond the salinity tolerance threshold. Environ. Exp. Bot., 59, 276-282
57. Maringo G., Peltier J.P., 1996. Analysis of the diurnal change in osmotic potential in leaves of Fraxinus excelsior L. J. Exp. Bot., 47, 763-769
58. Martínez E.M., 2008. Estudio de propiedades hídricas del suelo mediante medidores de actividad de agua en la zona regable de Terra Chá. 496 p. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
59. Martínez E.M., Cancela J.J., 2009. Calibración de un medidor de actividad de agua: Punto de marchitamiento permanente. In: V Congreso Nacional y II Congreso Ibérico AgroIngeniería. 237-238. Dpto. Ing. Agroforestal (ed.), UNICOPIA, Lugo
60. Martínez E.M., Cancela J.J., 2011. Condiciones de contorno en las determinaciones del punto de marchitamiento permanente con water activity meters. Span. J. Rural Dev., 2, 1-14
61. Martínez E.M., Cancela J.J., Cuesta T.S., Neira X.X., 2007. Efecto de la temperatura en el uso de un medidor de la actividad de agua. In: XXV Congreso Nacional de Riegos. 29-31. Gobierno de Navarra (ed.), ONA S.A., Pamplona
62. Martínez E.M., Cancela J.J., Cuesta T.S., Neira X.X., 2011. Review. Use of psychrometers in field measurements of plant material: accuracy and handling difficulties. Span. J. Agric. Res., 9, 313-328
63. McBurney T., Costigan P.A., 1987. Plant water potential measured continuously in the field. Plant Soil, 97, 145-149
64. Medrano H., Escalona J.M., Flexas J., 2007. Indicadores integradores del estado hídrico de la planta. In: Fundamentos, aplicación y consecuencias del riego en la vid. 15-34. Baeza P., Lissarrague J.R., Sanchez P. (eds.), Ed. Agrícola Española S.A., Madrid
65. Millar B.D., Hansen G.K., 1975. Exclusion errors in pressure chamber estimates of leaf water potential. Ann. Bot., 39, 915-920
66. Mullins C.E., 2001. Matric potential. In: Soil and environmental analysis. Physical methods. 65-93. Smith K.A., Mullins C.E., (eds.), Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
67. Murray E.J., Sivakumar V., 2010. Unsatured soils: A fundamental interpretation of soil behavior. 304 p. Wiley-Blackwell, UK
68. Nadal M., Arola L., 1995. Effects of limited irrigation on the composition of must and wine of Cabernet Sauvignon under semi-arid conditions. Vitis, 34, 151-154
69. Nadal M., Lampreave M., 2004. Influence de l'irrigation sur la résponse hydrique du cep, le rendement et la composition des vins du cv Tempranillo cv. In Mediterranean climate. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 38, 75-80
70. Naor A., Bravdo B., Hepner Y., 1993. Effect of post-veraison irrigation level on Sauvignon blanc yield, juice quality and water relations. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 14, 19-25
71. O'Neill S.D., 1983. Role of osmotic potential gradients during water stress and leaf senescence in Fragaria virginiana. Plant Physiol., 72, 931-937
72. Padilla F.M., Miranda J.D., Jorquera M.J., Pugnaire F.I., 2009. Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Ecol., 204, 261-270
73. Patel A.D., Pandey A.N., 2007. Effect of soil salinity on growth, water status and nutrient accumulation in seedlings of Cassia montana (Fabaceae). J. Arid Environ., 70, 174-182
74. Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L. McMahon T.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1633-1644
75. Petrie P.R., Cooley N.M., Clingeleffer P.R., 2004. The effects of post-veraison water deficit on yield components and maturation of irrigated Shiraz (Vitis vinifera L.) in the current and following season. Aust J. Grape Wine Res., 10, 203-215
76. Petry T.M., Jiang C.P., 2003 Evaluation and utilization of the WP4 dewpoint potentiameter Phase I and II. Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies. University Transportation Center Program, University of Missouri-Rolla, Missouri
77. Phillips D.L., 1981. End-point recognition in pressure chamber measurements of water potential of Viguiera porter (Asteraceae). Ann. Bot., 48, 905-907
78. Pire R., de Pire M.L., Tortolero E., de Fréitez Y., 1988. El riego de la vid (Vitis vinifera L.) en el Toyuco. Estado Lara. II. Relaciones suelo agua. Agronomía Tropical, 38, 155-171
79. Richter H., 1976. The water status in the plant experimental evidence. In: Water and plant life. Vol. 19. 42-58. Lange O.L., Kappen L., Schulze E.-D. (ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin
80. Ritchie G.A., Hinckley T.M., 1975. The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. Adc. Ecol. Res., 9, 165-254
81. Rivero R.M., Kojima M., Gepstein A., Sakakibara H., Mittler R., Gepstein S., Blumwald E., 2007. Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. PANS., 104, 19631-19636
82. Roby G., Harbertson J.F., Adams D.A., Matthews M.A., 2004. Berry size and wine water deficits as factor in winegrape composition: anthocyanins and tannins. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 10, 100-107
83. Santalucia G., Barbagallo M.G., Costaza P., Lorenzo D., Pisciotta A., 2007. Vegetative and reproductive behaviour of Vitis vinifera L. (cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') vines growing under non-irrigated conditions and moderate water stress induced by different irrigation systems. Acta Hort., 754, 323-328
84. Santesteban L.G., Miranda C., Royo J.B., 2007. Regulated deficit irrigation effects in cv. 'Tempranilló vineyards grown under semiarid conditions in Mid-Ebro river valley (Spain). Acta Hort., 754, 501-506
85. Scanlon B.R., Andraski B.J., Bilskie J., 2002. Miscellaneous methods for measuring matric or water potential. In: Methods of soil analysis-Part 4: Physical Methods. 643-670. Dane J.H., Topp G.C. (eds.), SSSA, Madison
86. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.J., Bradstreet A., Hwemmingsen E.A., 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science, 148, 339-346
87. Smart R.E., Coombe B.G., 1983. Water relations of grapevines. In: Water deficit and plant growth. Vol. 7. 137-196. Kozlowski T.T. (ed.), Academic press, New York
88. Tardieu F., Katerji N., Bethenod O., Zhang J., Davies W.J., 1991. Maize stomatal conductance in the field: its relationship with soil and plant water potentials, mechanical constraints and ABA concentration in the xylem sap. Plant Cell Environ., 14, 121-126
89. Thakur V.K.S., Sreedeep S., Singh D.N., 2006. Laboratory investigations on extremely high suction measurements for finegrained soils. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 24, 565-578
90. Turner N.C., 1981. Correction of flow resistances of plants measured from covered and exposed leaves. Plant Physiol., 68, 1090-1092
91. Turner N.C., Long M.J., 1980. Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 7, 527-537
92. Turner N.C., Shackel K.A., Le Coultre I.F., 2000. Leaf-cutter psychrometers. Agron. J., 92, 538-541
93. Van Leeuwen C., Pieri P., Vivin P., 2010. Comparison of three operational tools for the assessment of vine water status: stem water potential, carbon isotope discrimination measured on grape sugar and water balance. In: Methodologies and results in grapevine research. 87-106. Delrot S., Medrano H., Or E., Bavaresco L., Grando S., (eds.). Springer, Netherlands
94. Van Leeuwen C., Tregoat O., Choné X., Bois B., Pernet D., Gaudillère J.P., 2009. Vine water status is a key factor in grape ripening and vintage quality for red Bordeaux vine. How can it be assessed for vineyard management purposes? J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 43, 121-134
95. Van Zyl J.L., 1987. Diurnal variation in grapevine water stress as a function of changing soil water status and meteorological conditions. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 8, 45-52
96. Walker R.R., Blackmore D.H., Clingeleffer P.R., Correll R.L., 2002. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour interrelationships. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 8, 3-14
97. Williams L.E., Araujo F.J., 2002. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127, 448-454
98. Xu Z., Zhou G., 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J. Exp. Bot., 59, 3317-3325
99. Yuste J., Gutiérrez I., Rubio J.A., Alburquerque M.V., 2004. Résponse des potentiels hydriques de la feuille et du xylème comme indidateurs de l'état hydrique de la vigne, cépage tempranillo, soumis à différents régimes hydriques dans la vallée du Douro. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin., 38, 21-26
100. Zufferey V., 2007. Alimentation en eau et irrigation de la vigne. Rev. S. Vitic. Arboric. Hortic., 39, 77-78