Effects of environment, leaf characteristics and measuring methodology on stem water potential in avocado trees (Persea americana Mill.);Efecto del clima, de las características de la hoja y de la metodología de medición en el potencial hídrico xilemático en palto (Persea americana Mill.)

Agricultura Tecnica

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 182-188

  Ferreyra E , Raúl ^a   Selles V, Gabriel ^a   Maldonado B, Patricio ^a   Celedón De A, José ^a   Gil M, Pilar ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGROPECUARIAS   (Chile)

Author keywords

Aguacate; Persea americana Mill.; Plant water status; Xylem water potential

Indexed keywords

PERSEA AMERICANA;

EID: 34848904901     PISSN: 03652807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aguilera, J., y S. Salazar. 1991. The avocado industry in Michoacan, México. South African Avocado Growers' Association Yearbook No 14. p. 94-97.
2. Ameglio, T., P. Archer, M. Cohen, C. Valancogne, F. Daudet, and P. Cruiziat. 1999. Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation. Plant Soil 207:155-167.
3. Boyer, J.S. 1995. Measuring the water status of plants and soils. 178 p. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
4. Cochran, W.G. 1971. Técnica de muestreo. 507 p. Compañía Ed. Continental S.A., México.
5. Fereres, E., and D. Goldhamer. 1990. Deciduous fruit and nut trees. Monograph No 30. p. 987-1017. In Steward, B.A., and Nielsen, D.R. (eds.). Irrigation of agricultural crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
6. Ferreyra, R., V. Selles, y G. Lemus. 2002. Efecto del estrés hídrico durante la fase II del crecimiento del fruto del duraznero cv. Kakamas en el rendimiento y estado hídrico de las plantas. Agric. Téc. (Chile) 62:565-573.
7. Ferreyra, R., V. Selles, P. Maldonado, J. Celedón, y A. Torres. 2006. Efecto de la macroporosidad y atmósfera del suelo en el estado hídrico del palto. 208 p. V Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería Agrícola. 9-12 mayo. Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola - Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigación Quilamapu, Chillan, Chile.
8. Ferreyra, R., V. Selles, J. Peralta, and J. Valenzuela. 2004. Effect of water stress applied al different development periods of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine on production and wine quality. Acta Hortic. 646:27-33.
9. Fulton, A., R. Buchner, B. Olson, L. Schwankl, C. Gilles, N. Betagna et al. 2001. Rapid equilibration of leaf and stem water potential under field conditions in almonds, walnuts, and prunes. HortTechnology 11:609-615.
10. Garnier, E., and A. Berger. 1985. Testing water potential in peach trees as an indicator of water stress. J. Hortic. Sci. 60:47-56.
11. Garnier, E., and A. Berger. 1987. The influence of drought on stomatal conductance and water potential on peach trees growing in the field. Sci. Hortic. 32:249-263.
12. Lampinen, B.D. 2004. Walnut production and orchard management in California. 9 p. Seminario Internacional El Nogal y otros Frutos de Nuez. 17 al 19 agosto 2004. Santiago. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Santiago, >Chile.
13. McCutchan, H., and K.A. Shackel. 1992. SWP as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117:607-611.
14. Nagera, F. 2006 Caracterización de suelos alcalinos cultivados con paltos (Persea amaricana Mill.) en la V Región de Chile y aplicación de ácido sulfúrico como corrector de pH. 41 p. Tesis Ingeniero Agrónomo. Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Santiago, Chile.
15. Naor, A. 1998. Relationships between leaf and stem water potential and stomatal conductance in three field-grown woody species. J. Hortic. Sci. 73:431-436.
16. Naor, A., I. Klein, and I. Doron. 1995. Stem water potential and apple fruit size. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120:577- 582.
17. Naor, A., and M. Peres. 2001. Pressure increase rate affects the accuracy of stem water potential measurements in deciduous trees using the pressure chamber technique. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 76:661-663.
18. Olien, W.C., and A.N. Lakso. 1986. Effect of rootstock on apple (Malus domestica) tree water relations. Physiol. Plant. 67:421-430.
19. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS User's guide. Versión 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, >USA.
20. Shackel, K.A., H. Ahmadi, W. Biasi, R. Buchner, D. Goldhamer, S. Gurusinghe et al. 1997. Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruti trees. HortTechnology 7:23-29.
21. Whiley, A.W., K.R. Chapman, and J.B. Saranah. 1988a. Water loss by floral structures of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cv. Fuerte during flowering. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 39:457-467.
22. Whiley, A.W., J.B. Saranah, B.W. Cull, and K.G. Pegg. 1988b. Manage avocado tree growth cycles for productivity gains. Queensland Agric. J. 114:29-36.
23. Williams, L.E., and F.J. Araujo. 2002. Correlation among predawn leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127 :448-454.
24. Wolstenholme, B. 1986. Energy costs of fruiting as a yield-limiting factor with special reference to avocado. Acta Hortic. 175:121-126.