The challenge of disruptive innovation in learning technology

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 227-228

  Bateman, James ^a   Davies, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84894039505     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12410     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:1181-96.
2. Lau KHV. Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories. Med Educ 2014;48:247-54.
3. Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ 2010;44:543-9.
4. Kellogg S. Online learning: how to make a MOOC. Nature 2013;499:369-71.
5. Parry M, Field K, Supiano B. The Gates Effect. 2013. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Gates-Effect/140323/. [Accessed 2 October 2013.]
6. Smothers V, Greene P, Ellaway R, Detmer DE. Sharing innovation: the case for technology standards in health professions education. Med Teach 2008;30:150-4.
7. Bateman J, Allen M, Samani D, Kidd J, Davies D. Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study. Med Educ 2013;47:595-606.
8. Bhutta ZA, Chen L, Cohen J et al. Education of health professionals for the 21st century: a global independent commission. Lancet 2010;375:1137-8.