Microbial community composition is consistent across anaerobic digesters processing wheat-based fuel ethanol waste streams

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 157, Issue , 2014, Pages 127-133

  Town, Jennifer ^a,b   Annand, Holly ^c   Pratt, Dyan ^c   Dumonceaux, Tim ^a,b   Fonstad, Terrance ^c  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Quantitative PCR; Thermophilic anaerobic digestion; Thin stillage; Wheat ethanol byproducts; Whole stillage

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BATCH REACTORS; ETHANOL; FERTILIZERS; MANURES; METHANE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ETHANOL BYPRODUCT; QUANTITATIVE PCR; THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; THIN STILLAGE; WHOLE STILLAGE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ALCOHOL; FUEL; METHANE; BIOFUEL;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOASSAY; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIOREACTOR; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ETHANOL; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THERMOPHILY; WHEAT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOASSAY; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL ASSAY; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MANURE; METHANOGEN; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROSEQUENCING; REACTOR; WASTE; WHEAT; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; BACTERIA; BIODIVERSITY; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; BOVINAE; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; DNA SEQUENCE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PH; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; CATTLE; ETHANOL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METHANE; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRITICUM; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84894030102     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.074     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angelidaki I. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:927-934.
2. APHA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.
3. Chou H.-H., Holmes M.H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:1093-1104.
4. Dumonceaux T.J., Hill J.E., Hemmingsen S.M., Van Kessel A.G. Characterization of intestinal microbiota and response to dietary virginiamycin supplementation in the broiler chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:2815-2823.
5. Eskicioglu C., Kennedy K.J., Marin J., Strehler B. Anaerobic digestion of whole stillage from dry-grind corn ethanol plant under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1079-1086.
6. Hill J.E., Town J.R., Hemmingsen S.M. Improved template representation in cpn60 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product libraries generated from complex templates by application of a specific mixture of PCR primers. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 8:741-746.
7. Hill T.C.J., Walsh K.A., Harris J.A., Moffett B.F. Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 43:1-11.
8. Huang X., Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9:868-877.
9. Labatut, R.A., Scott, N.R., 2008. Experimental and predicted methane yields from the anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with complex organic substrates. Providence, RI. pp. 6940-6957.
10. Links M.G., Chaban B., Hemmingsen S., Muirhead K., Hill J. mPUMA: a computational approach to microbiota analysis by de novo assembly of operational taxonomic units based on protein-coding barcode sequences. Microbiome 2013, 1:23.
11. Liska A.J., Yang H.S., Bremer V.R., Klopfenstein T.J., Walters D.T., Erickson G.E., Cassman K.G. Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn-ethanol. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13:58-74.
12. Lozupone C., Hamady M., Knight R. UniFrac - an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinf. 2006, 7:371.
13. Lozupone C., Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:8228-8235.
14. Møller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:485-495.
15. Owen W.F., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979, 13:485-492.
16. Rabelo S.C., Carrere H., Maciel Filho R., Costa A.C. Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7887-7895.
17. Saha N.K., Balakrishnan M., Batra V.S. Improving industrial water use: case study for an Indian distillery. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 43:163-174.
18. Sarkar N., Ghosh S.K., Bannerjee S., Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renewable Energy 2012, 37:19-27.
19. Schauer-Gimenez A.E., Zitomer D.H., Maki J.S., Struble C.A. Bioaugmentation for improved recovery of anaerobic digesters after toxicant exposure. Water Res. 2010, 44:3555-3564.
20. Schloss P.D., Westcott S.L., Ryabin T., Hall J.R., Hartmann M., Hollister E.B., Lesniewski R.A., Oakley B.B., Parks D.H., Robinson C.J., Sahl J.W., Stres B., Thallinger G.G., Van Horn D.J., Weber C.F. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7537-7541.
21. Town J.R., Links M.G., Fonstad T.A., Dumonceaux T.J. Molecular characterization of anaerobic digester microbial communities identifies microorganisms that correlate to reactor performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 151:249-257.
22. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7928-7940.
23. Werner J.J., Knights D., Garcia M.L., Scalfone N.B., Smith S., Yarasheski K., Cummings T.A., Beers A.R., Knight R., Angenent L.T. Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:4158-4163.
24. Westerholm M., Hansson M., Schnürer A. Improved biogas production from whole stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:314-319.
25. Ye J., Li D., Sun Y., Wang G., Yuan Z., Zhen F., Wang Y. Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure. Waste Manage. 2013, 33:2653-2658.
26. Ziganshin A., Liebetrau J., Pröter J., Kleinsteuber S. Microbial community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of various agricultural waste materials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:5161-5174.