Common data items in seven European oesophagogastric cancer surgery registries: Towards a European Upper GI cancer audit (EURECCA Upper GI)

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 325-329

  De Steur, W O ^a   Henneman, D ^a   Allum, W H ^b   Dikken, J L ^c   Van Sandick, J W ^d   Reynolds, J ^e   Mariette, C ^f   Jensen, L ^g   Johansson, J ^h   Kolodziejczyk, P ⁱ   Hardwick, R H ^j   Van De Velde, C J H ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

^d ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e ST JAMES S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^f LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g Department of Surgical Gastroenterology ^*  (Denmark)

^h LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

ⁱ JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^j ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Esophgeal cancer; EURECCA; Gastric cancer; Quality assurance; Upper gastro intestinal surgery

Indexed keywords

ESOPHGEAL CANCER; EURECCA; GASTRIC CANCER; QUALITY ASSURANCE; UPPER GASTRO INTESTINAL SURGERY;

DATABASES AS TOPIC; DENMARK; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; FRANCE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; NETHERLANDS; POLAND; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SWEDEN;

EID: 84893965189     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. H.F. Lingsma, E.W. Steyerberg, M.J. Eijkemans, D.W. Dippel, W.J. Scholte Op Reimer, and H.C. Van Houwelingen Comparing and ranking hospitals based on outcome: results from The Netherlands Stroke Survey QJM 103 2010 99 108
2. C.R. Friese, C.C. Earle, J.H. Silber, and L.H. Aiken Hospital characteristics, clinical severity, and outcomes for surgical oncology patients Surgery 147 2010 602 609
3. N.E. Kolfschoten, G.A. Gooiker, and E. Bastiaannet et al. Combining process indicators to evaluate quality of care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: are scores consistent with short-term outcome? BMJ Qual Saf 21 2012 481 489
4. H. Ptok, F. Marusch, U. Schmidt, I. Gastinger, H.J. Wenisch, and H. Lippert Risk adjustment as basis for rational benchmarking: the example of colon carcinoma World J Surg 35 2011 196 205
5. A.M. Ingraham, K.E. Richards, B.L. Hall, and C.Y. Ko Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality improvement program approach Adv Surg 44 2010 251 267
6. W. van Gijn, and C.J. van de Velde Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit Eur J Surg Oncol 36 Suppl. 1 2010 S23 S26
7. N.J. van Leersum, N.E. Kolfschoten, J.H. Klinkenbijl, R.A. Tollenaar, and M.W. Wouters 'Clinical auditing', a novel tool for quality assessment in surgical oncology Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 155 2011 A4136
8. W. van Gijn, M.W. Wouters, K.C. Peeters, and C.J. van de Velde Nationwide outcome registrations to improve quality of care in rectal surgery. An initiative of the European Society of Surgical Oncology J Surg Oncol 99 2009 491 496
9. N.J. van Leersum, H.S. Snijders, and D. Henneman et al. The Dutch surgical colorectal audit Eur J Surg Oncol 39 10 2013 1063 1070
10. W. van Gijn, C.B. van den Broek, and P. Mroczkowski et al. The EURECCA project: data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries Eur J Surg Oncol 38 2012 467 471
11. A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966 Milbank Q 83 2005 691 729
12. C.J. van de Velde, C. Aristei, and P.G. Boelens et al. EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe Eur J Cancer 49 2013 2784 2790