'Clinical auditing', a novel tool for quality assessment in surgical oncology;'Clinical auditing', een nieuw kwaliteitsinstrument in de chirurgische oncologie

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 155, Issue 45, 2011, Pages 2024-2031

  Van Leersum, Nicoline J ^a   Kolfschoten, Nikki E ^a   Klinkenbijl, Jean H G ^a   Tollenaar, Rob A E M ^a   Wouters, Michel W J M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT;

EID: 82055181853     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Codman EA. A Study in Hospital Efficiency. Boston, Mass.: Privately printed; 1916.
2. Antonacci AC, et al. Benchmarking surgical incident reports using a database and a triage system to reduce adverse outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1192-7.
3. Duxbury MS, et al. Management of colorectal cancer: variations in practice in one hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:400-2. (Pubitemid 36675701)
4. Freeman C, et al. Quality improvement for patients with hip fracture: experience from a multi-site audit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:239-45. (Pubitemid 35265253)
5. Galandiuk S, et al. Mutual reporting of process and outcomes enhances quality outcomes for colon and rectal resections. Surgery. 2004;136:833-41. (Pubitemid 39311310)
6. Hall BL, et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250:363-76.
7. Hammermeister KE, et al. Continuous assessment and improvement in quality of care. A model from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cardiac Surgery. Ann Surg. 1994;219:281-90. (Pubitemid 24085123)
8. Henke PK, et al. A statewide consortium of surgical care: a longitudinal investigation of vascular operative procedures at 16 hospitals. Surgery. 2010;148:883-9.
9. Khuri SF, et al. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137:20-7. (Pubitemid 34041814)
10. Khuri SF, et al. Successful implementation of the department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: The patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg. 2008;248:329-36.
11. Aitken RJ, et al. Lothian surgical audit: a 15-year experience of improvement in surgical practice through regional computerised audit. Lancet. 1997;350:800-4. (Pubitemid 27387218)
12. Aletti GD, et al. Quality improvement in the surgical approach to advanced ovarian cancer: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:614-20.
13. Dellinger EP, et al. Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am J Surg. 2005;190:9-15. (Pubitemid 40828597)
14. Doran KA, et al. Breakthrough change for adult cardiac surgery in a community-based cardiovascular program. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;6:29-36.
15. Forbes SS, et al. Implementation of evidence-based practices for surgical site infection prophylaxis: results of a pre- and postintervention study. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:336-41.
16. Garnerin P, et al. Verifying patient identity and site of surgery: Improving compliance with protocol by audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:454-8.
17. Haynes AB, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491-9.
18. Holman WL, et al. Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results from phase II of a statewide quality improvement initiative. Ann Surg. 2004;239:99-109. (Pubitemid 38176379)
19. O'Connor GT, et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1996;275:841-6. (Pubitemid 26087220)
20. Potenza B, et al. Lessons learned from the institution of the Surgical Care Improvement Project at a teaching medical center. Am J Surg. 2009;198:881-8.
21. Richardson NG, et al. Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in a district general hospital saves money and resources. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:262-5. (Pubitemid 28369681)
22. Tavris DR, et al. Evaluation of a local cooperative project to improve postoperative pain management in Wisconsin hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 1999;7:20-7.
23. Ferguson TB Jr, et al. Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Increase Use of Process Measures in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2003;290:49-56.
24. Guadagnoli E, Soumerai SB, Gurwitz JH, Borbas C, Shapiro CL, Weeks JC, et al. Improving discussion of surgical treatment options for patients with breast cancer: Local medical opinion leaders versus audit and performance feedback. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;61:171-5. (Pubitemid 30456237)
25. Neumayer L, et al. Using the veterans administration national surgical quality improvement program to improve patient outcomes. J Surg Res. 2000;88:58-61.
26. Sheikh K, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing the frequency of radical prostatectomy procedures in the elderly: an evaluation. Am J Med Qual. 2003;18:97-103. (Pubitemid 37026140)
27. Berenguer CM, et al. Improving Surgical Site Infections: Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data to Institute Surgical Care Improvement Project Protocols in Improving Surgical Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:737-41.
28. Campbell DA Jr, et al. Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: The power of hospital collaboration. Arch Surg. 2010;145:985-91.
29. Reilly J, et al. Changing surgical practice through feedback of performance data. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:607-14.
30. Jamtvedt G, et al. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:433-6. (Pubitemid 46025156)
31. Mugford M, et al. Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review. BMJ. 1991;303:398-402.
32. Peeters KC, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:693-701. (Pubitemid 350035641)