Dentate gyrus mediates cognitive function in the Ts65Dn/DnJ mouse model of down syndrome

Hippocampus

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 354-362

  Smith, Genevieve K ^a   Kesner, Raymond P ^b   Korenberg, Julie R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Configural object recognition; Developmental disorders; Hippocampus; Object recognition; Spatial location recognition

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTATE GYRUS; DOWN SYNDROME; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MOUSE; MOUSE MODEL; NONHUMAN; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION;

CONFIGURAL OBJECT RECOGNITION; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS; HIPPOCAMPUS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SPATIAL LOCATION RECOGNITION;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, CONGENIC; COGNITION; DENTATE GYRUS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOWN SYNDROME; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C3H; MICE, TRANSGENIC; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TEMPORAL LOBE; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC; TRISOMY;

EID: 84893958405     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22229     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 2006. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 10:455-463.
2. Bartko SJ, Winters BD, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2007. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in configural object recognition and perceptual oddity tasks. Learn Mem 14:821-832.
3. Belichenko PV, Kleschevnikov AM, Masliah E, Wu C, Takimoto-Kimura R, Salehi A, Mobley WC. 2009. Excitatory-inhibitory relationship in the fascia dentate in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. J Comp Neurol 512:453-466.
4. Belichenko PV, Masliah E, Kleschevnikov AM, Villar AJ, Epstein CJ, Salehi A, Mobley WC. 2004. Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. J Comp Neurol 480:281-298.
5. Braudeau J, Delatour B, Duchon A, Pereira PL, Dauphinot L, de Chaumont F, Olivo-Marin JC, Dodd RH, Hérault Y, Potier MC. 2011. Specific targeting of the GABA-A receptor α5 subtype by a selective inverse agonist restores cognitive deficits in Down syndrome mice. J Psychopharmacol 25:1030-1042.
6. Brown MW, Aggleton JP. 2001. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2:51-61.
7. Deese BS, Kesner RP. 2013 (in press). The role of the dorsal dentate gyrus in object and object-context recognition. Neurobiol Learn Mem.
8. Dix SL, Aggleton JP. 1999. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: Evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav Brain Res 99:191-200.
9. Ennaceur A. 2010. One trial object recognition in rats and mice: Methodological and theoretical issues. Behav Brain Res 215:244-254.
10. Ennaceur A, Delacour J. 1988. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31:47-59.
11. Faizi M, Bader PL, Tun C, Encarnacion A, Kleschevnikov A, Belichenko P, Saw N, Priestley M, Tsien RW, Mobley WC, Shamloo M. 2011. Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: Activation of β1-adrenergic receptor by xamoterol as a potential cognitive enhancer. Neurobiol Dis 43:397-413.
12. Fernandez F, Morishita W, Zuniga E, Nguyen J, Blank M, Malenka RC, Garner CC. 2007. Pharmacotherapy for cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Nat Neurosci 10:411-413.
13. Gilbert PE, Kesner RP, Lee I. 2001. Dissociating hippocampal subregions: A double dissociation between dentate gyrus and CA1. Hippocampus 11:626-636.
14. Goodrich-Hunsaker NJ, Hunsaker MR, Kesner RP. 2008. The interactions and dissociations of the dorsal hippocampus subregions: How the dentate gyrus, CA3, and CA1 process spatial information. Behav Neurosci 122:16-26.
15. Hernández-Rabaza V, Barcia JA, Llorens-Martín M, Trejo JL, Canales JJ. 2007. Spared place and object-place learning but limited spatial working memory capacity in rats with selective lesions of the dentate gyrus. Brain Res Bull 72:315-323.
16. Hunsaker M, Kesner RP. 2013. The operation of pattern separation and pattern completion processes associated with different attributes or domains of memory. Neurosci and Biobehav Rev 37:36-58.
17. Kealy J, Commins S. 2011. The rat perirhinal cortex: A review of anatomy, physiology, plasticity, and function. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Apr;93(4):522-48.
18. Kesner RP, Morris AM, Weeden CS. 2012. Spatial, temporal, and associative behavioral functions associated with different subregions of the hippocampus. In: Zentall TR, Wasserman EA, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp 322-344.
19. Kesner RP. 2013. Role of the hippocampus in mediating interference as measured by pattern separation. Behavioral Processes 93:148-154.
20. Kleschevnikov AM, Belichenko PV, Gall J, George L, Nosheny R, Maloney MT, Salehi A, Mobley WC. 2012. Increased efficiency of the GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 45:683-691.
21. Langston RF, Wood ER. 2010. Associative recognition and the hippocampus: Differential effects of hippocampal lesions on object-place, object-context and object-place-context memory. Hippocampus 20:1139-1153.
22. Lee I, Hunsaker MR, Kesner RP. 2005. The role of hippocampal subregions in detecting spatial novelty. Behav Neurosci 119:145-153.
23. Lockrow D, Boger H, Bimonte-Nelson H, Granholm A. 2010. Effects of memantine on memory and neuropathology in Ts65Dn mice. Behav Brain Res 221:610-622.
24. Mumby DG. 2001. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: Lessons from studies in rats. Behav Brain Res 127:159-181.
25. Popov VI, Kleschevnikov AM, Klimenko OA, Stewart MG, Belichenko PV. 2011. Three-dimensional synaptic ultrastructure in the dentate gyrus and hippocampal area CA3 in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. J Comp Neurol 519:1338-1354.
26. Poucet B. 1989. Object exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change in rats following septal or medial frontal cortical damage. Behav Neurosci 103:1009-1016.
27. Rolls ET, Kesner RP. 2006. A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory. Prog Neurobiol 79:1-48.
28. Seregaza Z, Roubertoux PL, Jamon M, Soumireu-Mourat B. 2006. Mouse models of cognitive disorders in trisomy 21: A review. Behav Genet 36:387-404.
29. Spanswick SC, Sutherland RJ. 2010. Object/context-specific memory deficits associated with loss of hippocampal granule cells after adrenalectomy in rats. Learn Mem 17:241-245.
30. Winters BD, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2010. Implications of animal object memory research for human amnesia. Neuropsychologia 48:2251-2261.