Toward a more rigorous, reflective, and relevant science of collaborative management research

Handbook of Collaborative Management Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 567-582

  Pasmore, William A ^a   Woodman, Richard W ^b   Simmons, Aneika L ^c  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849135563     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976671.n27     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Adler, N., & Shani, A. B. (Rami). (2001). In search of an alternative framework for the creation of actionable knowledge: Table-tennis research at Ericsson. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 13, 43-79). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/S0897-3016(01)13002-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3016%2801%2913002-8
2. Amabile T. M. Patterson C. Mueller J. Wojcik T. Odomirok P. W. Marsh M., et al. Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration Academy of Management Journal 44 (2) (2001) 418-431 doi:10.2307/3069464 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069464
3. Barner R. Managing complex team interventions Team Performance Management 12 (1/2) (2006) 44-54 doi:10.1108/13527590610652792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13527590610652792
4. Barnes T. Pashby I. Gibbons A. Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects European Management Journal 20 (June) (2002) 272-285 doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373%2802%2900044-0
5. Bartunek J. M. Louis M. R. Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives Journal of Management Inquiry 1 (6) (1992) 101-110
6. Beard, J. W., Woodman, R. W., & Moesel, D. (1998). Using behavioral modification to change attendance patterns in the high-performance, high-commitment environment. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 11, 183-234). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
7. Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (Eds.). (2006). Productive reflection at work. London: Routledge.
8. Burnes, B. (in press). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.
9. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Coghlan, D., & Coughlan, P. (2005). Collaborative research across borders and boundaries: Action research insights from the CO-IMPROVE project. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 15, 272-295). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
11. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Perracchio, L. (1990). Quasi experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., 491-576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2005). Organization development and change (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
13. Ellis A. P. J. Bell B. S. Ployhart R. E. Hollenbeck J. R. Ilgen D. R. An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill-based outcomes Personnel Psychology 58 (3) (2005) 641-672 doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00617.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00617.x
14. French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1999). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16. Holweg M. Disney S. Holmstrom J. Smaros J. Supply chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum European Management Journal 23 (April) (2005) 170-181 doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.02.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.02.008
17. Jarman R. When success isn’t everything: Case studies of two virtual teams Group Decision and Negotiation 14 (4) (2005) 333-354 doi:10.1007/s10726-005-0318-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-0318-3
18. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, A. M., Jr., Mohrman, S. A., Ledford, G. E., & Cummings, T. G. (1985). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Mathieu J. E. Heffner T. S. Goodwin G. F. Salas E. Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2) (2000) 273-284 doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
23. Mohrman S. A. Gibson C. B. Mohrman A. M. Jr. Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration Academy of Management Journal 44 (2) (2001) 357-375 doi:10.2307/3069461 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069461
24. Offermann L. R. Spiros R. K. The science and practice of team development: Improving the link Academy of Management Journal 44 (2) (2001) 376-392 doi:10.2307/3069462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069462
25. Pettigrew A. M. Woodman R. W. Cameron K. S. Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research Academy of Management Journal 44 (4) (2001) 607-713
26. Rynes S. L. Bartunek J. M. Daft R. L. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics Academy of Management Journal 44 (2) (2001) 340-355
27. Sommer R. Action research is formative: Research at the Saskatchewan hospital, 1957-61 Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 19 (12) (1983) 427-438
28. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Woodman, R. W. (1989). Evaluation research on organizational change: Arguments for a combined paradigm approach. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 3, 161-180). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30. Woodman, R. W., Bingham, J. B., & Yuan, F. (in press). Assessing organization development and change interventions. In T. G. Cummings (Ed.), Handbook of organization development and change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.