The promise of collaborative management research

Handbook of Collaborative Management Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 7-32

  Pasmore, William A ^a,b   Stymne, Bengt ^c,d,e   Rami Shani, A B ^f,g   Mohrman, Susan Albers ^h   Adler, Niclas ⁱ  

^a Oliver Wyman Delta Organization and Leadership Consulting   (United States)

^b Stockholm School of Economics ^*  (United States)

^c STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

^d The Research Institute of Industrial Economics   (Sweden)

^e Inst Mgmt of Innov and Technol   (Sweden)

^f CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ JÖNKÖPING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951289981     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976671.n1     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Adler, N., Shani, A. B. (Rami), & Styhre, A. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations: Foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development. London: Sage.
2. Argyris, C. (1980). Inner contradictions of rigorous research. New York: Academic Press.
3. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Argyris, C., & Schén, D. (1982). Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Argyris C. Schén D. Participatory action research and action science compared American Behavioral Scientists 32 (1989) 612-623 doi:10.1177/0002764289032005008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289032005008
6. Berger, P., & Luckmann, P. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Brown L. D. Participative action research for social change Human Relations 46 (2) (1990) 249-273 doi:10.1177/001872679304600206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600206
9. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Evered R. D. Louis M. R. Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: Inquiry from the inside and inquiry from the outside Academy of Management Review 6 (1981) 385-395
11. Gergen, K. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5706-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5706-6
12. Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (2005) 75-91 doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558 http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
13. Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Hoffman A. Reconsidering the role of the practical theorist: On (reconnecting theory to practice in organization theory Strategic Organization 2 (2004) 213-222 doi:10.1177/1476127004042845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127004042845
15. Huff A. S. Changes in organizational knowledge production: 1999 presidential address Academy of Management Review 25 (2000) 288-293
16. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.
17. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Mitroff, I. (1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action. London: Sage.
22. Reason P. Torbert W. R. The action turn: Towards a transformational social science Concepts and Transformation 6 (1) (2001) 1-37 doi:10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
23. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Shani, A. B. (Rami), David, A., & Wilson, C. (2004). Collaborative research: Alternative roadmaps. In N. Adler, A. B. (Rami) Shani, & A. Styhre (Eds.), Collaborative research in organizations (83-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Simon, H. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Stymne, B. (2006). The innovative research enterprise. In J. Léwstedt & T. Stjernberg (Eds.), Producing management knowledge: Research as practice. London: Routledge.
27. Susman G. I. Evered R. D. An assessment of the scientific merit of action research Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (1978) 583-603
28. Tandon R. Participatory action research and social transformation Convergence 21 (2/3) (1989) 5-15
29. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
30. Torbert, W. R. (1976). Creating a community of inquiry: Conflict, collaboration and transformation. London: Wiley.
31. Torbert W. R. The distinctive questions developmental action inquiry asks Management Learning 30 (2) (1999) 189-206 doi:10.1177/1350507699302006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350507699302006
32. Trist E. Bamforth K. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting Human Relations 1 (1951) 3-38
33. Weick K. Quinn R. Organizational change and development Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1999) 361-386 doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
34. Whyte, W. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.