Establishing an agenda for social studies research in marine renewable energy

Energy Policy

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 694-702

  Kerr, Sandy ^a   Watts, Laura ^b   Colton, John ^c   Conway, Flaxen ^d   Hull, Angela ^a   Johnson, Kate ^a   Jude, Simon ^e   Kannen, Andreas ^f   MacDougall, Shelley ^c   McLachlan, Carly ^g   Potts, Tavis ^h   Vergunst, Jo ⁱ  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^h SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Marine energy; Marine Renewable Energy; Public perceptions; Social science; Tidal energy; Wave energy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893820782     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.063     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aitken M. Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6066-6075.
2. Alexander K.A., Janssen R., Arciniegas G., O'Higgins T.G., Eikelboom T. Interactive marine spatial planning: siting tidal energy arrays around the mull of kintyre. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(1):e30031. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030031.
3. Alexander K., Wilding T., Heymans J. Attitudes of Scottish fishers towards marine renewable energy. Energy Policy 2013, 37:239-244.
4. Alexander K., Potts T., Wilding T.A. Marine renewable energy and Scottish west coast fishers: exploring impacts, opportunities and potential mitigation. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2013, 75:1-10.
5. Ahlhorn, F., Klenek, T., Jay, S. Ritchie, H. 2010. Stakeholder involvement in Germany's marine spatial planning process: traditional and innovative types of sea use. Marine Planning Symposium, Sheffield, May 2010.
6. Allan G.J., Lecca P., McGregor P.G., Swales J.K. The economic impacts of marine energy developments: a case study from Scotland. Marine Policy 2013, 43:122-131.
7. Backer, H., Frias, M., 2012. Planning the Bothnian Sea-key Findings of the Plan Bothnia Project. Finepress, Turku.
8. Bailey I., West J., Whitehead I. Out of sight but not out of mind? Public perceptions of wave energy. J. Envir Policy Planning 2011, 13:139-157.
9. Ban N.C., Alidina H.M., Ardron J.A. Cumulative impact mapping: advances, relevance and limitations to marine management and conservation using Canada's Pacific waters as a case study. Marine Policy 2010, 34:876-886.
10. BBC 2011 MCT's Skye tidal energy plan sparks direct action row. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-12969980.
11. Beaumont N.J., Austen M.C., Mangi C.S., Townsend M. Economic valuation and the conservation of marine biodiversity. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56:386-396.
12. Beaumont, N., Hattam, C., Mangi, S., Moran, D. van Soest, D., Jones, L., Tobermann, M. 2010. Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services Provided by UK Coastal Margin and Marine Habitats, Final Report. The Economics Team of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.
13. Bell D., Gray T., Haggett C. The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environ. Politics 2005, 14:60-77.
14. Bell D., Gray T., Haggett C., Swaffield J. Revisiting the 'social gap': public opinion of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environ. Politics 2013, 22:115-135.
15. Bertram C., Dworak T., Görlitz S., Interwies E., Rehdanz K. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of the EU MSFD: The case of Germany. Marine Policy 2013, 43:307-312.
16. British Wind Energy Association, 2011. Best Practices Guidelines: Consultation for Offshore Wind energy Developments. BWEA.
17. Busch M., Kannen A., Garthe S., Jessopp M. Consequences of a cumulative perspective on marine environmental impacts: offshore wind farming and seabirds at North Sea scale in context of the EU MSFD. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2013, 71:213-224.
18. Canmet Energy, 2011. The marine renewable energy sector early-stage supply chain. NaturalResources Canada. (accessed May 2013). http://www.marinerenewables.ca.
19. CSE (Centre for Sustainable Energy), 2005. Community benefits from wind power: A study of UK practice and comparison with leading European countries. (accessed May 2013). http://www.cse.org.uk/pdf/pub1049.pdf.
20. Colton J., Howell A. Opportunities and strategies for communities. Community and Business Toolkit for Tidal Energy Development 2013, 147-171. Acadia Tidal Energy Institute, Wolfville, (accessed May 2013). S. MacDougall, J. Colton (Eds.).
21. Cormier, R., Kannen, A., Elliott, M., Hall, P., Davies, I.A. 2013. Marine and coastal ecosystem-based risk management handbook. ICES Cooperative Research Report no. 317.
22. Cortright, J., 2006. Making sense of clusters: Regional competitiveness and economic development. The Brookings Institution. (accessed May 2013). http://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20060313.
23. Crown Estate, 2011. Wave and tidal energy in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters: How the projects could be built. The Crown Estate, London.
24. DECC 2011. UK Renewable Energy Roadmap. HM Government, London.
25. DECC, 2013. DECC Public Attitudes Tracker - Wave 5. Key Findings. DECC, London. (accessed 02.05.2013). http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/193079/Summary_of_Wave_5_findings_of_Public_Attitudes_Tracker.pdf.
26. Devine-Wright P. Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: a UK case study. Energy Policy 2011, 39:83-93.
27. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy 2008, 32:762-771.
28. EU 2012. European Commission. Blue Growth, Scenarios and drivers for Sustainable Growth from the Oceans, Seas and Coasts. Third interim report, Rotterdam/Brussels.
29. Ferland J. Tidal energy development. Maine Policy Rev. 2008, 17:111-113.
30. Gee, K., Kannen, A., Heinrichs, B., 2011. BaltSeaPlan Vision 2030 for Baltic Sea Space. Hamburg, Autumn 2011, http://www.baltseaplan.eu/index.php/BaltSeaPlan-Vision-2030;494/1.
31. German Federal Ministry for Environmental Protection, 2011. The implementation status of Natura 2000 in Germany. (accessed 25.06.2012). http://www.bfn.de/0316_gebiete.htm.
32. Gill, A.B., Jude, S., Prpich, G., Mauelshagen, C., Queen, A., 2012. Review of environmental risk and uncertainty for supporting policy development and decision making for the marine renewable energy sector. NERC MREKEP Report. Cranfield University.
33. Healy P. Planning through debate. Town Planning Rev. 1992, 63:143-162.
34. Helmreich Stefan Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas 2009, University of California Press, Berkeley.
35. Hoeppe G. Conversations on the beach: fishermen's knowledge, metaphor and environmental change in South India 2007, Berghahn Books, New York.
36. ICES, 2012. Joint DFO/KnowSeas, and ICES Workshop on Quality Assurance in MSP (WKQAMSP), 28 Feb.-1 March 2012, Dartmouth, Canada. ICES CM 2012/SSGHIE:02.
37. IEA (International Energy Agency), 2007. Implementing Agreement on Ocean Energy Systems (IEA-OES), Annual Report 2007. (accessed May 2013). http://www.ocean-energy-systems.org/oes_documents/annual_reports/.
38. Jude, S., 2013. Understanding How Marine Renewable Device Operations Influences Fine Scale Habitat Use and Behaviour of Marine Vertebrates (RESPONSE) Project risk Scoping Workshop Summary. Centre for Environmental Risks and Futures, Cranfield University.
39. Jay S. Built at sea. Town Planning Rev. 2010, 81:173-191.
40. Johnson K., Kerr S., Side J. Accommodating wave and tidal energy-Control and decision in Scotland. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2012, 65:26-33.
41. Johnson K., Kerr S., Side J. Marine Renewables and Coastal Communities - experiences from the offshore oil industry in the 1970s and their relevance to marine renewables in the 2010s. Marine Policy 2013, 38:491-499.
42. Kammen D., Kapadia K., Fripp M. Putting Renewables to Work: How many jobs can the Clean Energy Industry generate? Energy resources Group, Goldman School of Public Policy. Berkley 2004, University of California.
43. Kannen, A., 2012. Challenges for marine spatial planning in the context of multiple sea uses, policy arenas and actors based on experiences from the German North Sea, Regional Environmental Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0349-7.
44. Kannen A., Kremer H., Gee K., Lange M. Renewable Energy and Marine Spatial Planning: Scientific and Legal Implications. The Regulation of Continental Shelf Development: Rethinking International Standards 2013, 153-178. COLP Series. M.H. Nordquist, J.M. Moore, A. Chircop, R. Long (Eds.).
45. Kidd S., Ellis G. From the land to sea and back again? Using terrestrial planning to understand the process of marine spatial planning. J. Environ. Policy Planning 2012, 14:49-66.
46. Lundquist P., Power D. Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: evidence from Sweden. Eur. Planning Studies 2002, 10:685-704.
47. McLachlan C. 'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best china': symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case. Energy Policy 2009, 37:5342-5350.
48. Mclachlan, C., 2010. Tidal stream energy in the UK: a stakeholder perceptions study. Tyndall Centre Working Paper.
49. Mclachlan C. Symbolic interpretations of a wave energy case: surfers' perspectives. Public Engagement with Renewable Energy: From NIMBY to Participation 2011, Earthscan, London. P. Devine-Wright (Ed.).
50. Mclachlan C., Mander S. What have facts got to do with it anyway? Competing knowledge claims in low-carbon energy controversy. Low-Carbon Energy Controversies 2013, T. Roberts, P. Upham, S. Mander, C. Mclachlan, P. Boucher, C. Gough, D. Abi Ghanem (Eds.).
51. Martinez-Fernandez C., Hinojosa C., Miranda G. Greening Jobs and Skills: Labour Market Implications of Addressing Climate Change 2010, OECD, Paris.
52. MES (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
53. Miranda, G., Larcombe, G., 2012. Enabling Local Green Growth: Addressing Climate Change Effects on Employment and Local Development, OECD Local Economic and Employment Development Working papers no. 2012/01. 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris.
54. Nightingale A. Beyond design principles: subjectivity, emotion and the (ir)rational commons. Soc. Nat. Res. 2011, 24:119-132.
55. Obermann E., MacDougall S. Opportunities and strategies for businesses. Community and Business Toolkit for Tidal Energy Development 2013, 172-213. Acadia Tidal Energy Institute, Wolfville, (accessed May 2013). S. MacDougall, J. Colton (Eds.).
56. OECD-LEED, 2012. Measuring the Potential of Local Green Growth: Analysis of Greater Copenhagen. OECD, programme on local economic and employment development. OECD, Paris.
57. Orlove B, Caton S.C. Water sustainability: anthropological approaches and prospects. Ann. Rev. Anthropology 2010, 39(1):401-415.
58. OVG (Offshore Valuation Group), 2010. The offshore valuation: a valuation of the UK's offshore renewable energy resource. (accessed May 2013). http://www.offshorevaluation.org.
59. Phillipson J., Symes D. Recontextualising inshore fisheries: the changing face of British inshore fisheries management. Marine Policy 2010, 34:1207-1214.
60. Potts T. The natural advantage of regions: linking sustainability, innovation, and regional development in Australia. J. Cleaner Prod. 2010, 18:713-725.
61. Potts T., Burdon D., Jackson E., Atkins A., Saunders J., Hastings E., Langmead O. Do marine protected areas deliver flows of ecosystem services to support human welfare?. Marine Policy 2014, 44:139-148.
62. Renewable UK, 2011. A Community Commitment: The Benefits of Onshore Wind. Renewable UK, London.
63. Sagoff M. On the economic value of ecosystem services. Environ. Value 2008, 17:239-257.
64. Saunders, J., Tinch, R., Hull, S., 2010. Valuing the Marine Estate and UK Seas: An Ecosystem Services Framework. The Crown Estate, London.
65. Scottish Government, 2009. Marine Energy Group. Marine energy supply chain survey; (accessed May 2013). http://www.cambridge-resource-economics.co.uk/.
66. Smith H.D., Ballinger R.C., Stojanovic T.A. The spatial development basis of marine spatial planning in the United Kingdom. J. Environ. Policy Planning 2012, 14:29-47.
67. Steinberg, Philip E. The Social Construction of the Ocean 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.
68. Strang V. The Meaning of Water 2004, Oxford, Berg.
69. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. The Spanish approach to marine spatial planning. MSFD vs. EU IMP. Marine Policy. 2012, 36:18-27.
70. Thomson, I., Boutilier, G., 2011. Modelling and measuring the social licence to operate: fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. In: Proceedings, International Mine Management, Queensland, Australia.
71. Thrift N., Amin A. Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
72. Voke M., Fairley I., Willis M., Masters I. Economic evaluation of the recreational value of the coastal environment in a marine renewables deployment area. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2013, 78:77-87.
73. Watts L. OrkneyLab: An archipelago experiment in futures. Imagining Landscapes. Past, Present and Future 2012, 59-76. Ashgate, Aldershot. B. Janowski, T. Ingold (Eds.).
74. Watts, L., Peebles, A., 2012. Orkney Futures: A Handbook. Brae Editions, Stromness.
75. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renew. Susta. Energy Rev. 2007, 11:1188-1207.