Re-visiting the 'social gap': Public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy

Environmental Politics

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 115-135

  Bell, Derek ^a   Gray, Tim ^a   Haggett, Claire ^b   Swaffield, Joanne ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

fairness; NIMBY; place attachment; social gap; wind energy

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; NOT IN MY BACK YARD RESPONSE; POWER RELATIONS; WIND FARM; WIND POWER;

EID: 84874186180     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755793     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Agterbosch, S., Vermeulen, W. and Glasbergen, P. 2009. Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social-institutional setting. Energy Policy, 32(18): 393-405. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
2. Aitken, M. 2009. Wind power planning controversies and the construction of 'expert' and 'lay' knowledges. Science as Culture, 18(1): 47-64. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
3. Aitken, M. 2010a. Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4): 1834-1841. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
4. Aitken, M. 2010b. Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 38(10): 6066-6075. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
5. Aitken, M. 2010c. A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: empowerment or social control?. Planning Theory, 9(3): 248-264. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
6. Aitken, M., McDonald, S. and Strachan, P. 2008. Locating power in wind power planning controversies: the (not so) influential role of local objectors. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(6): 777-799. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
7. Barry, J., Ellis, G. and Robinson, C. 2008. Cool rationalities and hot air: a rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2): 67-94. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
8. Barry, M. and Chapman, R. 2009. Distributed small-scale wind in New Zealand: advantages, barriers and policy support instruments. Energy Policy, 37(9): 3358-3369. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
9. Bell, D., Gray, T. and Haggett, C. 2005. The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environmental Politics, 14(4): 460-477. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
10. BERR. 2007. Renewable energy awareness and attitudes research, London: GfK NOP Social Research, UK Department for Business, Enterprise, and Regulatory Reform. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
11. BERR. 2008. Renewable energy awareness and attitudes research, London: GfK NOP Social Research, UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
12. Brack, J. and Haggett, C. forthcoming. "Public perceptions of offshore wind: familiarity, saturation and consultation in the case of Robin Rigg. Under review at". In Local Environment doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
13. Breukers, S. and Wolsink, M. 2007a. Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation. Environmental Politics, 16(1): 92-112. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
14. Breukers, S. and Wolsink, M. 2007b. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2737-2750. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
15. Burningham, K. 2000. Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers. Local Environment, 5(1): 55-67. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
16. BWEA, 2012. UK wind energy database (UKWED) [online]. http://www.bwea.com/ukwed/index.asp (Accessed: 10 December 2011).
17. Cowell, R., Bristow, G. and Munday, M. 2011. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4): 539-557. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
18. DECC, 2011. UK renewable energy roadmap [online]. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/renewable-energy/2167-uk-renewable-energy-roadmap.pdf (Accessed: 5 October 2011).
19. DECC, 2012. Energy trends: section 6-renewables. Renewable Statistics [online]. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/stats/publications/energy-trends/3946-energy-trends-section-6-renewables.pdf (Accessed: 10 October 2011).
20. Devine-Wright, P. 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8(2): 125-139. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
21. Devine-Wright, P. 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19(6): 426-441. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
22. Devine-Wright, P. 2011. Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: a tidal energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4): 336-343. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
23. Devine-Wright, P. 2012. Explaining 'NIMBY' objections to a power line: the role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environment and Behaviour, doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
24. Devine-Wright, P. and Howes, Y. 2010. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3): 271-280. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
25. DTI, 2003. Attitudes and knowledge of renewable energy amongst the general public. Prepared for the DTI by TNS [online]. http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file15478.pdf (Accessed: 10 December 2011).
26. DTI. 2006. Renewable energy awareness and attitudes research, London: GfK NOP Social Research, UK Department of Trade and Industry. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
27. Ellis, G., Barry, J. and Robinson, C. 2007. Many ways to say 'no', different ways to say 'yes': applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposal. Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 517-551. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
28. Eltham, D.C., Harrison, G.P. and Allen, S.J. 2008. Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: implications for planning. Energy Policy, 36(1): 23-33. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
29. Evans, B., Parks, J. and Theobald, K. 2011. Urban wind power and the private sector: community benefits, social acceptance and public engagement. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(2): 227-244. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
30. Eurobarometer. 2003. Energy: issues, options and technologies science and society, Brussels: The European Opinion Research Group. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
31. Eurobarometer. 2006. Energy technologies: knowledge, perceptions, measures, Brussels: European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 262 doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
32. Feldman, S. and Turner, D. 2010. Why not NIMBY?. Ethics, Place and Environment, 13(3): 251-266. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
33. Fisher, J. and Brown, K. 2009. Wind energy on the Isle of Lewis: implications for deliberative planning. Environment & Planning A, 41(10): 2516-2536. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
34. Graham, J.B., Stephenson, J.R. and Smith, I.J. 2009. Public perceptions of wind energy developments: case studies from New Zealand. Energy Policy, 37(9): 3348-3357. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
35. Gross, C. 2007. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2727-2736. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
36. Haggett, C. 2008. Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perceptions of offshore wind farms. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10(3): 289-306. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
37. Haggett, C. 2010. Why not NIMBY? A response, reviewing the empirical evidence. Ethics, Place, and Environment, 13(3): 313-316. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
38. Haggett, C. 2011. "Understanding people's experience of noise from wind farms". In Wind power, governance and society: lessons for future sustainable energy., Edited by: Cowell, R., Strachan, P. and Warren, C. 153-173. Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
39. Haggett, C. and Futak-Campbell, B. 2011. Using discourse analysis to understand the attitude-behaviour gap in renewable energy conflicts. Journal of Mechanisms of Economic Regulation, 1(2): 207-220. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
40. Haggett, C. and Toke, D. 2006. Crossing the great divide: using multi-method analysis to understand opposition to wind farms. Public Administration, 84(1): 103-112. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
41. Hindmarsh, R. and Matthews, C. 2008. Deliberative speak at the turbine face: community engagement, windfarms, and renewable energy transitions, in Australia. Environmental Policy and Planning, 10(3): 217-232. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
42. Hoffman, S. and High-Pippert, A. 2005. Community energy: a social architecture for analternative energy future. Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 25(5): 387-401. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
43. Jenkins, S. 2012. In the wind turbine debate, who dares utter the B-word?. The Guardian, 1 November. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
44. Jepson, W., Brannstrom, C. and Persons, N. 2012. 'We don't take the pledge': environmentality and environmental scepticism at the epicenter of US wind energy development. Geoforum, 43(4): 851-863. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
45. Jessup, B. 2010. Plural and hybrid environmental values: a discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics, 19(1): 21-44. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
46. Jobert, A., Laborgne, P. and Mimler, S. 2007. Local acceptance of wind energy: factorsof success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2751-2760. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
47. Jones, C.R. and Eiser, J.R. 2009. Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy, 37(11): 4604-4614. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
48. Jones, C.R. and Eiser, J.R. 2010. Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: how big is a backyard?. Energy Policy, 38(6): 3106-3117. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
49. Kaldellis, J.K., Kapsali, M. and Katsanou, E.V. 2012. Renewable energy applications in Greece-what is the public attitude?. Energy Policy, 42(1): 37-48. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
50. McLachlan, C. 2009. 'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best China': symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case. Energy Policy, 37(12): 5342-5350. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
51. McLachlan, C. 2010. Technologies in place: symbolic interpretations of renewable energy. Sociological Review, 57(2): 181-199. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
52. Pasqualetti, M. 2001. Wind energy landscapes: society and technology in the California desert. Society & Natural Resources, 14(8): 689-699. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
53. Phadke, R. 2010. Steel forests and smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy. Environmental Politics, 19(1): 1-20. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
54. Phadke, R. 2011. Resisting and reconciling big wind: middle landscape politics in the New American West. Antipode, 43(3): 754-776. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
55. Pidgeon, N.F., Lorenzoni, I. and Poortinga, W. 2008. Climate change or nuclear power-no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18(1): 69-85. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
56. Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. and Lorenzoni, I. 2006. Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: summary of findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005, School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
57. Righter, R. 2002. "Exoskeletal outer-space creations". In Wind power in view: energy landscapes in a crowded world, Edited by: Pasqualetti, M.J., Gipe, P. and Righter, R. 19-42. San Diego, CA: Academic. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
58. Rogers, J.C. 2008. Public perceptions of community based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 36(11): 4217-4226. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
59. Rootes, C. 2013. From local conflict to national issue: when and how environmental campaigns succeed in transcending the local. Environmental Politics, 22(1): 95-114. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
60. Smith, E.R.A.N. and Klick, H. 29 August 2007. "Explaining NIMBY opposition to wind power". In American Political Science Association 29 August, Boston, MA doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
61. Solli, J. 2010. Where the eagles dare? Enacting resistance to wind farms through hybrid collectives. Environmental Politics, 19(1): 45-60. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
62. Sturzaker, J. 2011. Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England. Planning Practice and Research, 26(5): 555-570. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
63. Swofford, J. and Slattery, M. 2010. Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision making. Energy Policy, 38(5): 2508-2519. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
64. Toke, D. 2002. Wind power in UK and Denmark: can rational choice help explain different outcomes?. Environmental Politics, 11(4): 83-100. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
65. Toke, D. 2005a. Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy, 33(12): 1527-1539. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
66. Toke, D. 2005b. Community wind power in Europe and in the UK. Wind Engineering, 29(3): 301-308. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
67. Toke, D. 2005c. Will the government catch the wind?. The Political Quarterly, 76(1): 48-56. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
68. Toke, D. 2011. Ecological modernisation, social movements and renewable energy. Environmental Politics, 20(1): 60-77. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
69. Toke, D., Breukers, S. and Wolsink, M. 2008. Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4): 1129-1147. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
70. Upham, P. 2009. Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study. Energy Policy, 37(11): 4273-4283. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
71. van der Horst, D. and Toke, D. 2010. Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments: local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 214-221. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
72. Waldo, A. 2012. Offshore wind power in Sweden-a qualitative analysis of attitudes with particular focus on opponents. Energy Policy, 41(1): 692-702. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
73. Walker, G. and Devine-Wright, P. 2008. Community renewable energy: what should it mean?. Energy Policy, 36(2): 497-500. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
74. Walker, G. 2007. Harnessing community energies: explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics, 7(2): 64-82. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
75. Walker, G. 2010. Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38(6): 2655-2663. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
76. Warren, C.R. and Birnie, R.V. 2009. Re-powering Scotland: wind farms and the 'energy or environment' debate. Scottish Geographical Journal, 125(2): 97-126. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
77. Warren, C.R. and McFayden, M. 2010. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 204-213. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
78. Whitmarsh, L. 2011. Public attitudes, understanding, and engagement in relation to low-carbon energy: a selective review of academic and non-academic literatures, London: Research Councils UK. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
79. Wolsink, M. 2000. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21(1): 49-64. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
80. Wolsink, M. 2006. Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(1): 85-91. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
81. Wolsink, M. 2007. Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2692-2704. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
82. Wustenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Burer, M.J. 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5): 2683-2691. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435
83. Zografos, C. and Martinez-Alier, J. 2009. The politics of landscape value: a case study of wind farm conflict in Catalonia. Environment and Planning A, 41(7): 1726-1744. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435