Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 358-363

  Park, Jeong Yeol ^a   Kim, Dae Yeon ^a   Suh, Dae Shik ^a   Kim, Jong Hyeok ^a   Nam, Joo Hyun ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endometrial cancer; Laparoendoscopic single site surgery; Laparoscopy; Surgical staging

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY MASS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; EARLY CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT HISTORY OF LAPAROSCOPY; PATIENT SAFETY; PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; TROCAR;

AGED; CARCINOMA, ENDOMETRIOID; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; UTERUS;

EID: 84893793136     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000046     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10-29.
2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45:1-14.
3. Suh DH, Kim K, Kim JW. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2011. J Gynecol Oncol. 2012;23:53-64.
4. Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, et al. Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2012;379: 1352-1360.
5. Fram KM. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:57-61.
6. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:126-133.
7. Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ, et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:763-771.
8. Obermair A, Janda M, Baker J, et al. Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1147-1153.
9. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, et al. Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:4-9.
10. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:695-700.
11. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5331-5336.
12. Zorlu CG, Simsek T, Ari ES. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer. JSLS. 2005;9:442-446.
13. Zullo F, Palomba S, Falbo A, et al. Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:296 e1-e9.
14. Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD006655.
15. Zullo F, Falbo A, Palomba S. Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:94-100.
16. Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, et al. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906-912.
17. Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011;25: 2462-2469.
18. Kim DY, Kim MK, Kim JH, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:932-937.
19. Cho YH, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Laparoscopic management of early uterine cancer: 10-year experience in Asan Medical Center. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:585-590.
20. Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Gagliardi ML, et al. Total laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low-risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:41-46.
21. Fagotti A, Boruta DM 2nd, Scambia G, et al. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:353 e1-e6.
22. Escobar PF, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, et al. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1583-1588.
23. Fagotti A, Corrado G, Fanfani F, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case-control study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130:219-223.
24. Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2759-2764.