Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: A randomised trial

The Lancet Oncology

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 763-771

  Mourits, Marian J E ^a   Bijen, Claudia B ^a   Arts, Henriëtte J ^a   ter Brugge, Henk G ^b   van der Sijde, Rob ^c   Paulsen, Lasse ^d   Wijma, Jacobus ^e   Bongers, Marlies Y ^f   Post, Wendy J ^a   van der Zee, Ate G ^a   de Bock, Geertruida H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology   (Netherlands)

^d Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis   (Netherlands)

^e MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIOID CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM HYPERPLASIA; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, ENDOMETRIOID; ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OVARIECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SAFETY;

EID: 77955268275     PISSN: 14702045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70143-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 2009, 373:125-136.
2. Panici P Benedetti, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008, 100:1707-1716.
3. Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005, 15:319-324.
4. Manolitsas TP, McCartney AJ Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002, 9:54-62.
5. Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paparella P, Catalano GF Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 180:270-275.
6. Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 107:1386-1391.
7. Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, Kjolhede P Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy-a randomised controlled multicentre study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2006, 113:1023-1030.
8. Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996, 103:345-350.
9. Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007, 14:145-152.
10. Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 1999, 14:2996-2999.
11. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004, 328:129.
12. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 2009, 112:126-133.
13. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer-a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 80:239-244.
14. Fram KM Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002, 12:57-61.
15. Zorlu CG, Simsek T, Ari ES Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer. JSLS 2005, 9:442-446.
16. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:1344-1352.
17. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:5331-5336.
18. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, Spirtos NM, Rotmensch J, Cella D Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:5337-5342.
19. Bijen CB, Briet JM, de Bock GH, Arts HJ, Bergsma-Kadijk JA, Mourits MJ Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study. BMC Cancer 2009, 9:23.
20. Goff BA, Nielsen PE, Lentz GM, et al. Surgical skills assessment: a blinded examination of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:613-617.
21. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1055-1068.
22. Madalinska JB, Hollenstein J, Bleiker E, et al. Quality-of-life effects of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening among women at increased risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:6890-6898.
23. Stead ML, Fountain J, Napp V, Garry R, Brown JM Psychometric properties of the Body Image Scale in women with benign gynaecological conditions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004, 114:215-220.
24. Rorarius MG, Kujansuu E, Baer GA, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative pain, fatigue and systemic response. A case-control study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001, 18:530-539.
25. Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet 2000, 355:1404-1411.
26. Scribner DR, Walker JL, Johnson GA, McMeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 83:563-568.
27. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2001, 91:378-387.
28. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009, 374:1105-1112.
29. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, et al. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005, 330:88.
30. Waler SD, Ismaila AS, Devereaux PJ Statistical issues in the design and analysis of expertise-based randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 2008, 27:6583-6596.
31. Cook JA The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials 2009, 10:9.
32. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 2009, 374:1089-1096.