I-CAN: The classification and prediction of support needs

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 97-111

  Arnold, Samuel R C ^a   Riches, Vivienne C ^a   Stancliffe, Roger J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Classification; Intellectual disability; Support needs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUPPORT NEEDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; SUPPORT NEEDS;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893720102     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: 14683148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jar.12055     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arnold S. R. C., Riches V. C., Parmenter T. R., Llewellyn G., Chan J. & Hindmarsh G. (2009) I-CAN: Instrument for the Classification and Assessment of Support Needs, Instruction Manual V4.3. Centre for Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
2. Brown H. K., Ouellette-Kuntz H., Bielska I. & Elliott D. (2009) Choosing a measure of support need: implications for research and policy. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 53, 949-954.
3. Bruininks R. H., Hill B., Weatherman R. & Woodcock R. (1986) The Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP). DLM Teaching Resources, Allen, TX.
4. Campbell E. M. (2008) SIS Leadership Forum: The Statistical Approach to Generating Individual Budgets. Available at: http://www.siswebsite.org/galleries/default-file/CampbellResourceallocation.pdf (accessed 21 April 2010).
5. Claes C., Hove G. V., Loon J. V., Vandevelde S. & Schalock R. L. (2009) Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs. staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs. Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 53, 329-338.
6. Einfeld S., Tonge B., Chapman L., Mohr C., Taffe J. & Horstead S. (2007) Inter-rater reliability of the diagnoses of psychosis and depression in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 20, 384-390.
7. Gould A. (1998) The Service Need Assessment Profile (Version 1.0) (Computer Software and Manual). ATG & Associates Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
8. Greenspan S. & Switzky H. N. (2005) Fourty four years of AAMR manuals. In: What is Mental Retardation? Ideas for an Evolving Disability in the 21th Century (eds H. N. Switzky & S. Greenspan), revised and updated edition, pp. 283-302. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC.
9. Guscia R., Harries J., Kirby N. & Nettelbeck T. (2006) Rater bias and the measurement of support needs. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 31, 156-160.
10. Hamilton B. B., Granger C. V., Sherwin F. S., Zielezny M. & Tashman J. S. (1987) A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement (ed M. Fuhrer), pp. 137-147. Brookes, Baltimore.
11. Hessl D., Nguyen D., Green C., Chavez A., Tassone F., Hagerman R., Senturk D., Schneider A., Lightbody A., Reiss A. & Hall S. (2009) A solution to limitations of cognitive testing in children with intellectual disabilities: the case of fragile X syndrome. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1, 33-45.
12. Luckasson R., Coulter D. L., Polloway E. A., Reiss S., Schalock R. L., Snell M. E., Spitalnik D. M. & Stark J. A. (1992) Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification and Systems of Support. 9th edn. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Washington, DC.
13. Luckasson R., Schalock R. L., Snell M. E. & Spitalnik D. M. (1996) The 1992 AAMR definition and preschool children: response from the committee on terminology and classification. Mental Retardation 34, 247-253.
14. Luckasson R., Borthwick-Duffy S., Buntix W. H. E., Coulter D. L., Craig E. M., Reeve A., Schalock R. L., Snell M. E., Spitalnik D. M., Spreat S. & Tasse M. (2002) Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification and Systems of Support. 10th edn. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Washington, DC.
15. Mansell J., Beadle-Brown J., Asman B. & Ockenden J. (2005) Person-Centred Active Support. Pavilion Publishing Ltd, Brighton, UK.
16. Morin D. & Cobigo V. (2009) Reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (French version). Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 47, 24-30.
17. O'Brien J. & Lyle O'Brien C. (eds) (1998) A Little Book about Person Centered Planning. Inclusion Press, Toronto.
18. Parmenter T. R. (2005) Are we engineering ourselves out of existence? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 30, 53-6.
19. Macklin J. & McLucas J. (2013). Gillard Government passes NDIS Bill through Parliament [Press Release]. Available at: http://jennymacklin.fahcsia.gov.au/node/2281 (accessed on 30 March 2013).
20. Riches V. C., Parmenter T. R., Llewellyn G., Hindmarsh G. & Chan J. (2009a) I-CAN: a new instrument to classify needs for people with disability: part I. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22, 326-339.
21. Riches V. C., Parmenter T. R., Llewellyn G., Hindmarsh G. & Chan J. (2009b) The reliability, validity and practical utility of measuring supports using the I-CAN instrument: part II. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22, 340-353.
22. Snell M. E. & Luckasson R. (2009) Characteristics and needs of people with intellectual disability who have higher IQs. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 47, 220-223.
23. Stancliffe R. J. (2004) Supports Intensity Scale: users manual [book review]. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Washington, DC. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 1, 182-183.
24. Stancliffe R. J. & Keane S. (2000) Outcomes and costs of community living: a matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 25, 281-305.
25. Stancliffe R. J. & Lakin K. C. (1998) Analysis of expenditures and outcomes of residential alternatives for persons with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation 102, 552-568.
26. Stancliffe R. J. & Lakin K. C. (eds) (2005) Costs and Outcomes of Community Services for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore.
27. Suen H. K. & Ary D. (1989) Analyzing Quantitative Behavioural Observation Data. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ.
28. Thompson J. R., Bryant B., Campbell E. M., Craig E. M., Hughes C., Rotholz D. A., Schalock R. L., Silverman W. & Tasse M. J. (2004) Supports Intensity Scale: User's Manual. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Washington, DC.
29. Thompson J. R., Bradley V., Buntinx W. H. E., Schalock R. L., Shogren K. A., Snell M. E., Wehmeyer M. L., Borthwick-Duffy S., Coulter D. L. & Craig E. M. (2009) Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 47, 135-146.
30. United Nations (UN) (2007) Convention on the Rights of People with Disability. United Nations, New York.
31. Vermont G. (1994) Assessing the Support Needs of Adults with an Intellectual Disability Accessing Day Programs. Vermont Consulting, East Kew, Vic.
32. Weiss J. A., Lunsky Y., Tassé M. J. & Durbin J. (2009) Support for the construct validity of the Supports Intensity Scale based on clinician rankings of need. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30, 933-941.
33. World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organisation, Geneva.