Reliability of the supports intensity scale (French version)

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-30

  Morin, Diane ^a   Cobigo, Virginie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL RETARDATION; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65549127832     PISSN: 19349491     EISSN: 19349556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/2009.47:24-30     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
2. Clay-Adkins, S. L. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Supports Intensity Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
3. Kamphaus, R. W. (1987). Conceptual and psychometric issues in the assessment of adaptive behavior. Journal of Special Education, 21, 27-35.
4. Lamoureux, M. (2006). Les besoins de soutien des personnes présentant un retard mental manifestant des comportements problématiques [Support needs of individuals with intellectual disabilities and presenting challenging behaviours]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
5. Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntix, W. G. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., Reeve, A., et al. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
6. Luckasson, R., Coulter, D. L., Polloway, E. A., Reiss, S., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., et al. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, Classification and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
7. MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Siperstein, G. N. (1993). Conceptual and psychometric concerns about the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 325-335.
8. Tassé, M. J., & Craig, E. M. (1999). Critical issues in the cross-cultural assessment of adaptive behavior. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Adaptive behavior and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation (pp. 161-184). Wash ington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
9. Tassé, M. J., Thompson, J. R., & McLaughlin, C. (2006). Inter-interviewer and inter-respondent concordance on the Support Intensity Scale. Paper presented at the International Summit for the Alliance on Social Inclusion, Montreal, Canada.
10. Thompson, J. R., Bryant, B. R., Campbell, E. M., Craig, E. M., Hughes, C., Rotholz, D. A., Schalock, R., Silverman, W., Tassé, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (2004). Supports Intensity Scale: User's manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
11. Thompson, J. R., Hughes, C., Schalock, R. L., Silverman, W., Tassé, M. J., Bryant, B., et al. (2002). Integrating supports in assessment and planning. Mental Retardation, 40, 390-405.
12. Thompson, J. R., Tassé, M. J., & McLaughlin, C. (2006). Interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS). American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 231-237.