Review of current studies in instructional design theory in Korea: Major trends and future directions

Asia Pacific Education Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 357-364

  Lim, Cheolil ^a   Yeon, Eunkyoung ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Issues of instructional design theory; Review of instructional theory; Trends of instructional design theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893688573     PISSN: 15981037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-009-9027-y     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2. Fox, E. (2006). Constructing a pragmatic science of learning and instruction with functional contextualism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 5-36. doi:10.1007/ s11423-006-6491-5.
3. Gagné, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Lee, H. (2005). The effect of cognitive load on learning with multimedia. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 79-102.
6. Lee, S., & Lee, Y. (2007). Development of blended instructional model for creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 135-159.
7. Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
8. Lickona, T. (1999). Character education: The cultivation of virtue. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Lim, C. (2007). The current status and future prospects of corporate e- Learning in Korea. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 12 pp.
10. Ragan, T., & Smith, P. L. (1996). Conditions-based models for designing instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
11. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). A formative research: A methodology for improving theories and models of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Associations for Educational Communications and Technology.
14. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
15. Snelbecker, G. E. (1999). Current progress, historical perspective, and some tasks for the future of instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.