Mapping social-network interactions

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn 0, Issue 9783642274848, 2012, Pages 241-263

  O’Brien, James ^a   Field, Kenneth ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ESRI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); BLOGS; MAPPING; SEMANTICS;

FUNDAMENTAL BUILDING BLOCKS; INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS; MOBILE DATA COLLECTIONS; MONITORING APPLICATIONS; NETWORK INTERACTION; SEMANTIC CONTENT; SPATIAL EXPRESSIONS; SPATIAL LOCATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84893630051     PISSN: 18632246     EISSN: 18632351     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27485-5_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2010) Measuring consensus for collaborative decision-making: a GIS-based approach. Comput Environ Urban 34(4):322–332
2. Cai G, Yu B (2009) Spatial annotation technology for public deliberation. Trans GIS 13:123–146
3. Cerf V (1993) National collaboratories: applying information technology for scientific research. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
4. Chow TE (2008) The potential of maps APIs for internet GIS applications. Trans GIS 12 (2):179–191
5. Craver JM, Gold RS (2002) Research collaboratories: their potential for health behavior researchers. Am J Health Behav 26(6):504–509
6. Dalkey NC (1969) The delphi method: an experimental study on group opinion. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica
7. Darbyshire K (2009)UK snow map. [cited] http://nocto.com/uksnow/
8. Drummond J, Billen R, Joao E, Forrest D (2006) Dynamic and mobile GIS: investigating changes in space and time, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
9. Fairbairn D (2006) Measuring map complexity. Cartogr J 43:224–238
10. Field KS, O’Brien JA (2010a) Cartoblography: exploring the spatial context of micro-blogging. Paper read at GISRUK 2010, London, UK
11. Field KS, O’Brien JA (2010b) Cartoblography: experiments in using and organising the spatial context of micro-blogging. Trans GIS 14:5–23
12. Finholt T (ed) (2002) Collaboratories. American Society for Information Science and Technology, Washington, DC
13. Gahegan M, Brodaric B (2001) Learning geoscience categories in situ: implications for geographic knowledge representation. Paper read at ACM-GIS 2001 the ninth ACM international symposium on advances in geographic information systems, Atlanta
14. Ghaemi P, Swift J, Sister C, Wilson JP, Wolch J (2009) Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning. Comput Environ Urban 33 (6):482–491
15. Gibin M, Singleton A, Milton R, Mateos P, Longley P (2008) An exploratory cartographic visualisation of London through the google maps API. Appl Spat Anal Policy 1(2):85–97
16. Goodchild MF (2008) Commentary: wither VGI? GeoJournal 72(3–4):239–244
17. Google (2010) Google Maps API [cited 1 April 2010] http://code.google.com/apis/maps
18. Graham M (2009) Neogeography and the palimpsests of place: web 2.0 and the construction of a virual earth. Tijdschrift vood economicshe en sociale geografie 9999
19. Haklay M, Singleton A, Parker C (2008) Web mapping 2.0: the neogeography of the geoweb. Geography Compass 26:2011–2039
20. Hall GB, Chipeniuk R, Feick RD, Leahy MG, Deparday V (2010) Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and web 2.0. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24 (5):761–781
21. Hodza P (2009) Evaluating user experience of experiential GIS. Trans GIS 13(5–6):503–525
22. Honeycutt C, Herring SC (2009) Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Paper read at forty-second Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Los Alamitos
23. Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B (2007) Why we Twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper read at KDD, San Jose, California
24. Kaur S, Mann V, Matossian V, Muralidhar R, Parashar M (2001) Engineering a distributed computational collaboratory. In: 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 9, p 9026
25. Keahey K, Fredian T, Peng Q, Schissel DP, Thompson M, Foster I, Greenwald M, McCune D (2002) Computational grids in action: the national fusion collaboratory. Future Gener Comp Sy 18(8):1005–1015
26. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching. Educ Psychol 41:75–86
27. Kouzes R, Myers JD, Wulf WA (1996) Collaboratories: doing science on the internet. Computer 29(8):40–46
28. Linsey T, Ooms A, Downward S, Field KS, O’Brien J (2010) Mobilising remote student engagement on field trips. Paper read at association for learning technology annual conference, September 2010, Nottingham
29. Linstone H, Turoff M (1975) The delphi method. Addison-Wesley, Reading
30. MacEachren AM, Pike W, Yu C, Brewer I, Gahegan M, Weaver SD, Yarnal B (2006) Building a geocollaboratory: supporting human-environment regional observatory (HERO) collaborative science activities. Comput Environ Urban 30(2):201–225
31. Marsh B (2009) #uksnow Tweets. [cited 20 Feb 2009]. http://benmarsh.co.uk/snow/
32. Mischaud E (2007) Twitter: expressions of the whole self. An investigation into user appropriation of a web-based communications platform. Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics, London
33. Olson GM, Atkins DE, Clauer R, Finholt TA (1998) The upper atmosphere research collaboratory. Interactions 5(3):48–55
34. Olson GM, Teasley S, Bietz MJ, Cogburn DL (2002) Collaboratories to support distributed science: the example of international HIV/AIDS research. Paper read at 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on enablement through technology, Pretoria
35. Pike W, MacEachren A, Yarnal B (2009) Infrastructure for collaboration. In: Yarnal B, Polsky C, O’Brien J (eds) Sustainable communities on a sustainable planet – the human-environment regional observatory project. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 34–58
36. Rinner C, Keßler C, Andrulis S (2008) The use of web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Comput Environ Urban 32(5):386–395
37. Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Mansfield J, Jin Z (2005) Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter. Paper read at SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Portland, Oregon
38. Russell M, Allen G, Daues G, Foster I, Seidel E, Novotny J, Shalf J, Laszewski GV (2001) The astrophysics simulation collaboratory: a science portal enabling community software development. Paper read at 10th IEEE international symposium on high performance distributed computing, San Francicso, California
39. Sandoval WA (2003) Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations’. J Learn Sci 12(5–51)
40. Schissel DP, Finkelstein A, Foster IT, Fredian TW, Greenwald MJ, Hansen CD, Johnson CR, Keahey K, Klasky SA, Li K, McCune DC, Peng Q, Stevens R, Thompson MR (2002) Data management, code deployment, and scientific visualization to enhance scientific discovery in fusion research through advanced computing. Fusion Eng Des 60(3):481–486
41. Simon R, Fröhlich P, Anegg H (2007) Enabling spatially aware mobile applications. Trans GIS 11 (5):783–794
42. Turoff M, Hiltz S (1996) Computer based delphi processes. In: Adler M, Ziglio E (eds) In gazing into the oracle: the delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Kingsley, London