Evaluating user experience of experiential GIS

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 13, Issue 5-6, 2009, Pages 503-525

  Hodza, Paddington ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; SOILS;

AESTHETIC EMOTIONS; APPLICATION TASKS; COGNITIVE STIMULATIONS; GEO-SPATIAL; IMMERSIVE; NON-FUNCTIONAL; NON-FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS; SOIL MAPPING; USER-SYSTEM INTERACTION; USERS' EXPERIENCES;

ERGONOMICS;

GIS; MAPPING METHOD; SPATIAL DATA; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 72549118775     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01176.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Fischer R, Mues V, Schuck A. Reactions to geovisualization: An experience from a European project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:1149-71.
2. Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Voss H, Bernardo F, Hipolito J, Kretchmer U. Testing the usability of interactive maps in CommonGIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2002, 29:325-42.
3. Balram S, Dragicevic S. Collaborative Geographic Information Systems 2006, New York, Idea Group
4. Battarbee K, Koskinen I. Co-experience: User experience as interaction. CoDesign Journal 2005, 1:5-18.
5. Beauregard R, Younkin A, Corriveau P, Doherty R, Salskov E. Assessing the quality of user experience. Intel Technology Journal 2007, 11:77-87.
6. Blythe M A, Overbeeke K, Monk A F, Wright P C. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment 2003, Dordrecht, Kluwer
7. Brown A W. Large-scale Component-based Development 2000, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall
8. Caldwell R E, Brown R B. The Nature and Use of a Soil Survey. 2003, Gainesville, FL, University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Fact Sheet SL-11
9. Handling Geographic Information 1987, Chorley Committee, London, HMSO
10. Chrisman N R. Design of geographic information systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1987, 53:1367-70.
11. Coutinho E, Miranda E, Cangelosi A. Towards a model for embodied emotions: Proceedings of the 2005 Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2005). 2005, 54-63. In, Covilhã, Portugal
12. Crnkovic I, Larsson M. Challenges of component-based development. Journal of Systems and Software 2002, 61:201-12.
13. Davis C, Medyckyj-Scott D. GIS usability: Recommendations based on the user's view. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1994, 8:175-89.
14. Davis C, Medyckyj-Scott D. GIS users observed. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1996, 10:363-84.
15. Desmet P M A, Hekkert P, Green W, Jordan P. The basis of product emotions. Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability 2002, 60-8. In, eds, London, Taylor and Francis
16. Dillon A. Beyond usability: Process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science 2002, 26:57-69.
17. Dykes J A, Moore K E, Wood J D. Virtual environments for student fieldwork using networked components. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1999, 13:397-416.
18. Dykes J, MacEachren A M, Kraak M-J. Exploring Geovisualization 2005, eds, Amsterdam, Elsevier
19. Edsall R M, Larson K L. Decision making in a virtual environment: Effectiveness of a semi-immersive 'Decision Theater' in understanding and assessing human-environment issues: Proceedings of AutoCarto '06. 2006, http://www.cartogis.org/publications/autocarto-2006/edsalllarson.pdf/view, In, Vancouver, Washington (available at
20. Edwards T M. Virtual worlds technology as a means for human interaction with spatial problems: Proceedings of GIS/LIS'92. 1992, 208-20. In, San José, California
21. Fisher P, Unwin D. Virtual Reality in Geography 2002, eds, London, Taylor and Francis
22. Forlizzi J, Battarbee K. Understanding experience in interactive systems: In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04). 2004, 261. New York
23. Fuhrmann S, Ahonen-Rainio P, Edsall R M, Fabrikant S I, Koua E L, Tobón C, Ware C, Wilson S, Dykes J, MacEachren A M, Kraak M-J. Making useful and useable geovisualization: Design and evaluation issues. Exploring Geovisualization 2005, 553-66. In, eds, Amsterdam, Elsevier
24. Gahegan M, Brodaric B, Richardson D, van Oosterom P. Computational and visual support for geographic knowledge construction: Filling in the gaps between exploration and explanation. Advances in Spatial Data Handling, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling 2002, 11-26. In, eds, New York, Springer
25. Garrett J. The Elements of User Experience 2003, New York, AIGA New Riders
26. Green W S, Jordan P W. Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability 2002, London, Taylor and Francis
27. Haklay M, Tobón C. Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centered design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2003, 17:577-92.
28. Hassenzahl M. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2002, 13:479-97.
29. Hassenzahl M. Emotions can be quite ephemeral: We cannot design them. Interactions 2004, 11:46-8.
30. Hassenzahl M, Ghaoui C. Hedonic, emotional, and experimental perspectives on product quality. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction 2006, In, ed, New York, Idea Group
31. Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N. User experience: A research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 2006, 25:91-7.
32. Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F, Ziegler J, Szwillus G. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch and Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung 2003, 187-96. In, eds, Stuttgart, B.G. Teubner
33. Hassenzahl M, Platz A, Burmester M, Lehner K. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal: Proceedings of the ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference. 2000, 201-8. In, The Hague, The Netherlands
34. Huang B, Jiang B, Lin H. An integration of GIS, virtual reality and the Internet for visualization, analysis and exploration of spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2001, 15:439-56.
35. Heldal I, Spante M, Connell M. Are two heads better than one? Object-focused work in physical and in virtual environments: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 2006, 28-9. In, New York
36. Hudlicka E. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2003, 59:1-32.
37. Hutchins E. How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science 1995, 19:265-88.
38. ISO 9241/11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on Usability 1998, ISO 9241-11, Geneva, International Organization for Standardization
39. Jain R. Experiential computing. Communications of the ACM 2003, 46:48-55.
40. Jankowski P, Nyerges T. Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making: Toward a Participatory, Geographic Information Science 2001, London, Taylor and Francis
41. Jenny H. Factors in Soil Formation 1941, New York, McGraw-Hill
42. Jordan P W. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors 2000, First, Edition, Roca Baton, FL, CRC Press
43. Kitchin R, Dodge M, Unwin D, Fisher P. There is no there: Virtual reality, space and geographic visualization. Virtual Reality in Geography 2002, 341-61. In, eds, London, Taylor and Francis
44. Koua E L, MacEachren A M, Kraak M J. Evaluating the usability of visualization methods in an exploratory geovisualization environment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:425-48.
45. Kraak M-J. Geovisualization illustrated. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2003, 57:390-9.
46. Kuniavsky M. Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research 2003, San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann
47. MacEachren A M, Dykes J, MacEachren A M, Kraak M-J. Moving geovisualization toward support for group work. Exploring Geovisualization 2005, 445-61. In, eds, New York, Elsevier
48. MacEachren A M, Brewer I. Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geocollaboration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18:1-34.
49. MacEachren A M, Edsall R, Haug D, Baxter R, Otto G, Masters R, Fuhrmann S, Qian L, Ebert D, Shaw C. Virtual environments for geographic visualization: Potential and challenges. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation 1999a, 35-40. In, eds, New York, Association for Computing Machinery
50. MacEachren A M, Gahegan N, Pike B, Brewer I, Cai G, Lengerich E, Hardisty F. Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2004, 24:13-7.
51. MacEachren A M, Wachowicz M, Haug D, Edsall R, Masters R. Constructing knowledge from multivariate spatiotemporal data: Integrating geographic visualization with knowledge discovery in database methods. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 1999b, 13:311-34.
52. Mark G, Kobsa A, Gonzales V. Do four eyes see better than two? Collaborative versus individual discovery in data visualization systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Visualization. 2002, 249-55. In, London, England
53. Medyckyj-Scott D, Mark D M, Frank A U. GIS and the concept of usability. User Interfaces for Geographic Information Systems: Report on the Specialist Meeting 1992, 105-10. In, eds, Buffalo, NY, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
54. Mennis J L. Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 2003, 27:455-79.
55. Overbeeke C J, Djajadiningrat J P, Hummels C C M, Wensveen S A G, Green W, Jordan P. Beauty in usability: Forget about ease of use! Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability 2002, 9-18. In, eds, London, Taylor and Francis
56. Pate R. Soil Survey of Gilmer County, West Virginia 2004, Charlestown, WV, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
57. Peuquet D. It is about time: A conceptual framework for the representation of temporal dynamics in geographical information systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1994, 84:441-61.
58. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension 1966, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul
59. Raper J. Geographic Information Science 2000, Multidimensional, New York, Taylor and Francis
60. Rogers Y, Brown K. Distributed cognition and communication. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2006, 181-202. In, ed, Second, Edition, Oxford, Elsevier
61. Schrepp M, Held T, Laugwitz B. The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers 2006, 18:1055-69.
62. Shaw S-L, Yu H, Bombom L. A space-time GIS approach to exploring large individual-based spatiotemporal datasets. Transactions in GIS 2008, 12:425-41.
63. Singh R, Jain R, Goldin D, Smolka S, Wegner P. From information-centric to experiential environments. Interactive Computation: The New Paradigm 2006, 323-51. In, eds, New York, Springer Verlag
64. Slater M, Wilbur S. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1997, 6:603-16.
65. Slocum T A, Block C, Jiang B, Koussoulakou A, Montello D R, Fuhrmann S, Hedley N R. Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2001, 28:61-75.
66. Slocum T A, Cliburn D C, Feddema J J, Miller J R. Evaluating the usability of a tool for visualizing the uncertainty of the future global water balance. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2003, 30:299-317.
67. Soil Survey Manual 1993, Soil Survey Division Staff, Washington, DC, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Handbook No 18
68. Suh K-S, Chang S. User interfaces and consumer perceptions of online stores: The role of telepresence. Behaviour and Information Technology 2006, 25(2):99-113.
69. Talen E. Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 2000, 66:279-94.
70. Taylor D W. Student responses to their immersion in a virtual environment. 1997, Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois
71. Thurston J, Moore P, Parkinson B, Poiker T. GIS and visualization: Proceedings of the 2001 GIS Conference and Exposition. 2001, In, Vancouver, British Columbia
72. Tobón C. Usability Testing for Improving Interactive Geovisualization Techniques. 2002, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/Paper45.pdf, WWW document,
73. Tractinsky N, Katz A S, Ikar D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 2000, 13:127-45.
74. Evaluation of Technologies for Addressing Factors Related to Soil Erosion on DOD Lands. 1997, USACE, Champaign, IL, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Research Laboratory Technical Report 97/134
75. Van Dam A, Forsberg A S, Laidloaw D H, LaViola Jr J J, Simpson R M. Immersive VR for scientific visualization: A progress report. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2000, 20:26-52.
76. Van Driel J N, Van Driel J N, Davis J C. Three dimensional display of geologic data. Digital Geologic and Geographic Information Systems 1989, 57-62. In, eds, Washington, DC, American Geophysical Union
77. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:625-36.
78. Worboys M F, Duckham M. GIS: A Computing Perspective 2004, Second, Edition, Boca Rotan, FL, CRC Press
79. Wright P C, McArthy J, Meekison L, Blythe M, Overbeeke C, Monk A F, Wright P C. Making sense of experience. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment 2003, 43-53. In, eds, Dordrecht, Kluwer
80. Wu Q, Xu H, Zhou W. Development of a 3D GIS and its application to karst areas. Environmental Geology 2008, 54:1037-45.
81. Yuan M. Representing complex geographic phenomena in GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2001, 28:83-96.
82. Zhang J, Patel V L. Distributed cognition, representation and affordance. Pragmatics and Cognition 2006, 14:333-41.