Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Krishna, B Suresh ^a,b   Ipata, Anna E ^a,c   Bisley, James W ^a,d   Gottlieb, Jacqueline ^a,c   Goldberg, Michael E ^c  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GERMAN PRIMATE CENTER   (Germany)

^c Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Extrafoveal preview benefit; Eye movements; Transsaccadic; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EXTRAFOVEAL PREVIEW BENEFIT; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETINA FOVEA; RHESUS MONKEY; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSSACCADIC; VISION; VISUAL SEARCH;

EXTRAFOVEAL PREVIEW BENEFIT; EYE MOVEMENTS; TRANSSACCADIC; VISUAL SEARCH;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SACCADES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84893599789     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/14.1.6     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Balan, P. F., Oristaglio, J., Schneider, D. M., & Gottlieb, J. (2008). Neuronal correlates of the setsize effect in monkey lateral intraparietal area. PLoS Biology, 6(7), e158, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 0060158
2. Berg, D. J., Boehnke, S. E., Marino, R. A., Munoz, D. P., & Itti, L. (2009). Free viewing of dynamic stimuli by humans and monkeys. Journal of Vision, 9(5):19, 1-15, http://wwwjournalofvision.org/content/9/5/19, doi:10.1167/9.5.19. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Bichot, N. P., & Desimone, R. (2006). Finding a face in the crowd: Parallel and serial neural mechanisms of visual selection. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 147-156.
4. Bichot, N. P., Rossi, A. F., & Desimone, R. (2005). Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science, 308(5721), 529-534.
5. Bisley, J. W., Ipata, A. E., Krishna, B. S., Gee, A. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (2009). The lateral intraparietal area: A priority map in posterior parietal cortex. In M. Jenkin & L. Harris (Eds.), Cortical mechanisms of vision (pp. 9-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bowman, A. W., & Azzalini, A. (1997). Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with s-plus illustrations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Cameron, E. L., Tai, J. C., Eckstein, M. P., & Carrasco, M. (2004). Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks-Identification, yes/no detection and localization. Spatial Vision, 17(4-5), 295-325.
8. Carrasco, M., Evert, D. L., Chang, I., & Katz, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(8), 1241-1261.
9. Carrasco, M., Giordano, A. M., & McElree, B. (2004). Temporal performance fields: Visual and attentional factors. Vision Research, 44(12), 1351-1365.
10. Carrasco, M., Talgar, C. P., & Cameron, E. L. (2001). Characterizing visual performance fields: Effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. Spatial Vision, 15(1), 61-75.
11. Carrasco, M., & Yeshurun, Y. (1998). The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24(2), 673-692.
12. Caspi, A., Beutter, B. R., & Eckstein, M. P. (2004). The time course of visual information accrual guiding eye movement decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101(35), 13086-13090.
13. Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2010). The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72(5), 1283-1297. doi:10.3758/APP. 72.5.1283.
14. Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363(6427), 345-347. doi: 10.1038/363345a0.
15. Cohen, J. Y., Heitz, R. P., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2009). Neural basis of the set-size effect in frontal eye field: Timing of attention during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(4), 1699-1704.
16. Davis, E. T., & Palmer, J. (2004). Visual search and attention: an overview. Spatial Vision, 17(4-5), 249-255.
17. De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail. In J. Hyona, D. P. Munoz, W. Heide, & R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, 140.
18. Demeyer, M., De Graef, P., Wagemans, J., & Verfaillie, K. (2010). Parametric integration of visual form across saccades. Vision Research, 50(13), 1225-1234.
19. Dent, K., Allen, H. A., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 278.
20. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36(12), 1827-1837.
21. Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11(5):14, 1-36, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/11/5/14, doi:10.1167/11.5.14. [PubMed] [Article].
22. Einhauser, W., Kruse, W., Hoffmann, K. P., & Konig, P. (2006). Differences of monkey and human overt attention under natural conditions. Vision Research, 46(8-9), 1194-1209.
23. Engel, F. L. (1977). Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research, 17(1), 95-108.
24. Gajewski, D. A., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). The role of saccade targeting in the transsaccadic integration of object types and tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 820-830.
25. Gee, A. L., Ipata, A. E., & Goldberg, M. E. (2010). Activity in V4 reflects the direction, but not the latency, of saccades during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(4), 2187-2193.
26. Geisler, W. S., & Chou, K. L. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102(2), 356-378.
27. Germeys, F., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 868-883.
28. Hays, A. V., Richmond, B. J., & Optican, L. M. (1982). A UNIX-based multiple-process system for realtime data acquisition and control. WESCON Conference Proceedings, 2/1-1 to 2/1-10.
29. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(1), 58-71.
30. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 449-463.
31. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(6), 787-795.
32. Humphreys, G. W., Stalmann, B. J., & Olivers, C. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(5), 713-730.
33. Ipata, A. E., Gee, A. L., Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2009). Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area create a priority map by the combination of disparate signals. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 479-488.
34. Ipata, A. E., Gee, A. L., Goldberg, M. E., & Bisley, J. W. (2006). Activity in the lateral intraparietal area predicts the goal and latency of saccades in a freeviewing visual search task. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(14), 3656-3661.
35. Ipata, A. E., Gee, A. L., Gottlieb, J., Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2006). LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored. Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), 1071-1076.
36. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 420-456.
37. Judge, S. J., Richmond, B. J., & Chu, F. C. (1980). Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Research, 20(6), 535-538.
38. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 68-81.
39. Khayat, P. S., Spekreijse, H., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2004). Visual information transfer across eye movements in the monkey. Vision Research, 44(25), 2901-2917.
40. Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., & McDonald, S. A. (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 66(3), 581-600.
41. Knapen, T., Rolfs, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2009). The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is reti-notopic. Journal of Vision, 9(5):16, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/5/16, doi:10. 1167/9.5.16. [PubMed] [Article].
42. Knapen, T., Rolfs, M., Wexler, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. Journal of Vision, 10(1):8, 1-13, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/1/8, doi:10.1167/10. 1.8. [PubMed] [Article].
43. Kotowicz, A., Rutishauser, U., & Koch, C. (2010). Time course of target recognition in visual search. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 31.
44. Loader, C. (1999). Local regression and likelihood. New York: Springer-Verlag.
45. Maioli, C., Benaglio, I., Siri, S., Sosta, K., & Cappa, S. (2001). The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: Evidence from eye movement recording. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 364-372.
46. Makela, P., Whitaker, D., & Rovamo, J. (1993). Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field. Vision Research, 33(5-6), 723-730.
47. Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Deco, G. (2006). A computational model of visual marking using an inter-connected network of spiking neurons: The spiking search over time & space model (sSoTS). Journal of Physiology-Paris, 100(1-3), 110-124.
48. McDonald, S. A. (2005). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades. Vision Research, 45(14), 1829-1834.
49. McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46(26), 4416-4424.
50. McPeek, R. M., & Keller, E. L. (2001). Short-term priming, concurrent processing, and saccade curvature during a target selection task in the monkey. Vision Research, 41(6), 785-800.
51. McPeek, R. M., & Keller, E. L. (2002). Superior colliculus activity related to concurrent processing of saccade goals in a visual search task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87(4), 1805-1815.
52. McPeek, R. M., Skavenski, A. A., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search. Vision Research, 40(18), 2499-2516.
53. Melcher, D., & Colby, C. L. (2008). Trans-saccadic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 466-473.
54. Mirpour, K., Arcizet, F., Ong, W. S., & Bisley, J. W. (2009). Been there, seen that: A neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(6), 3481-3491.
55. Mirpour, K., & Bisley, J. W. (2012a). Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(46), 16449-16457.
56. Mirpour, K., & Bisley, J. W. (2012b). Dissociating activity in the lateral intraparietal area from value using a visual foraging task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(25), 10083-10088. doi: 1120763109 [pii]10.1073/pnas.1120763109.
57. Mort, D. J., & Kennard, C. (2003). Visual search and its disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology, 16(1), 51-57.
58. Motter, B. C., & Belky, E. J. (1998a). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38(12), 1805-1815.
59. Motter, B. C., & Belky, E. J. (1998b). The zone of focal attention during active visual search. Vision Research, 38(7), 1007-1022.
60. Motter, B. C., & Holsapple, J. (2007). Saccades and covert shifts of attention during active visual search: Spatial distributions, memory, and items per fixation. Vision Research, 47(10), 1261-1281.
61. Motter, B. C., & Holsapple, J. W. (2000). Cortical image density determines the probability of target discovery during active search. Vision Research, 40(10-12), 1311-1322.
62. Motter, B. C., & Simoni, D. A. (2007). The roles of cortical image separation and size in active visual search performance. Journal of Vision, 7(2):6, 1-15, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/2/6, doi: 10.1167/7.2.6. [PubMed] [Article].
63. Motter, B. C., & Simoni, D. A. (2008). Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Vision Research, 48(22), 2382-2393.
64. Mruczek, R. E., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2007). Activity of inferior temporal cortical neurons predicts recognition choice behavior and recognition time during visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(11), 2825-2836.
65. Muller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (Eds.). (2006). Visual search and attention: special issue of Visual Cognition (Vol. 14, 1st ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
66. Nothdurft, H. C., Pigarev, I. N., & Kastner, S. (2009). Overt and covert visual search in primates: Reaction times and gaze shift strategies. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 8(2), 137-174.
67. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 426-442.
68. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 199-210.
69. Pomplun, M. (2007). Advancing area activation towards a general model of eye movements in visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 120-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70. Prime, S. L., Vesia, M., & Crawford, J. D. (2011). Cortical mechanisms for trans-saccadic memory and integration of multiple object features. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1564), 540-553.
71. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.: Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
72. Rao, R. P., Zelinsky, G. J., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42(11), 1447-1463.
73. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
74. Schall, J. D., Sato, T. R., Thompson, K. G., Vaughn, A. A., & Juan, C. H. (2004). Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(6), 2765-2769.
75. Schall, J. D., & Thompson, K. G. (1999). Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 241-259.
76. Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2011). Visual search guidance is best after a short delay. Vision Research, 51(6), 535-545.
77. Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.
78. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (2001). Noticing familiar objects in real world scenes: The role of temporal cortical neurons in natural vision. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(4), 1340-1350.
79. Shepherd, S. V., Steckenfinger, S. A., Hasson, U., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2010). Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing. Current Biology, 20(7), 649-656.
80. Strasburger, H., Rentschler, I., & Juttner, M. (2011). Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: A review. Journal of Vision, 11(5):13, 1-82, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/11/5/13, doi:10.1167/11.5.13. [PubMed] [Article].
81. Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H. (2011). Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11(5):5, 1-23, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/5/5, doi:10.1167/11.5.5. [PubMed] [Article].
82. Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention, selection, awareness and control (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
83. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A featureintegration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
84. Verghese, P. (2001). Visual search and attention: A signal detection theory approach. Neuron, 31(4), 523-535.
85. Virsu, V., Nasanen, R., & Osmoviita, K. (1987). Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(8), 1568-1578.
86. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99-119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
87. Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36(14), 2177-2187.
88. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115(4), 787-835.
89. Zelinsky, G. J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 244-262.