Large-scale risk mapping of an eruptive bark beetle - Importance of forest susceptibility and beetle pressure

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 318, Issue , 2014, Pages 158-166

  Kärvemo, Simon ^a   Van Boeckel, Thomas P ^b,c,d   Gilbert, Marius ^b,c   Grégoire, Jean Claude ^b   Schroeder, Martin ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c FNRS   (Belgium)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

"Push pull" strategy; Infestation spots; Insect outbreak; Ips typographus; Risk assessment; Spruce bark beetle

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893581321     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.025     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ayres M.P., Martinson S.J., Friedenberg N.A. Southern Pine Beetle ecology: populations within stands. The Southern Pine Beetle Encyclopedia 2011, 75-89. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC. R.N. Coulson, K.D. Klepzig (Eds.).
2. Bentz B.J., Amman G., Logan J. A critical assessment of risk classification systems for the mountain pine beetle. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1993, 61:349-366.
3. Bentz B.J., Régnière J., Fettig C.J., Hansen E.M., Hayes J.L., Hicke J.A., Kelsey R.G., Lundquist J., Negrón J.F., Seybold S.J. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 2010, 60:602-613.
4. Berryman A.A. Principles of population dynamics and their application 1999, Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham.
5. Byers J.A., Zhang Q.H., Schlyter F., Birgersson G. Volatiles from non-host birch trees inhibit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 1998, 85:557-561.
6. Cairns D.M., Lafon C.W., Waldron J.D., Tchakerian M., Coulson R.N., Klepzig K.D., Birt A.G., Xi W. Simulating the reciprocal interaction of forest landscape structure and southern pine beetle herbivory using LANDIS. Landscape Ecol. 2008, 23:403-415.
7. Christiansen E., Bakke A. The spruce bark beetle of Eurasia. Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations 1988, 479-503. Plenum Press, New York. A.A. Berryman (Ed.).
8. Colombari F., Schroeder L.M., Battisti A., Faccoli M. Spatio-temporal dynamics of an Ips acuminatus outbreak and implications for management. Agric. For. Entomol. 2013, 15:34-42.
9. Cook S.M., Khan Z.R., Pickett J.A. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52:375-400.
10. Coulson R. Population dynamics of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1979, 24:417-447.
11. Dobbertin M., Wermelinger B., Bigler C., Bürgi M., Carron M., Forster B., Gimmi U., Rigling A. Linking increasing drought stress to Scots pine mortality and bark beetle infestations. Sci. World J. 2007, 7:231-239.
12. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudik M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29:129-151.
13. Elith J., Leathwick J., Hastie T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77:802-813.
14. Fettig C.J., Klepzig K.D., Billings R.F., Munson A.S., Nebeker T.E., Negrón J.F., Nowak J.T. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 238:24-53.
15. Friedman J.H., Meulman J.J. Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology. Stat. Med. 2003, 22:1365-1381.
16. Gobakken T., Næsset E. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2004, 19:529-542.
17. Grégoire J., Evans H. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms, an overview. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, A Synthesis 2004, 19-37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K. Day, A. Battisti, J.C. Grégoire, H. Evans (Eds.).
18. Grünwald M. Ecological segregation of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) of spruce. J. Appl. Entomol. 1986, 101:176-187.
19. Hayes C.J., Fettig C.J., Merrill L.D. Evaluation of multiple funnel traps and stand characteristics for estimating western pine beetle-caused tree mortality. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102:2170-2182.
20. Hedgren P.O., Schroeder L.M., Weslien J. Tree killing by Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) at stand edges with and without colonized felled spruce trees. Agric. For. Entomol. 2003, 5:67-74.
21. Jönsson A., Harding S., Bärring L., Ravn H. Impact of climate change on the population dynamics of Ips typographus in southern Sweden. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 2007, 146:70-81.
22. Kautz M., Dworschak K., Gruppe A., Schopf R. Quantifying spatio-temporal dispersion of bark beetle infestations in epidemic and non-epidemic conditions. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:598-608.
23. Klopcic M., Poljanec A., Gartner A., Boncina A. Factors related to natural disturbances in mountain Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests in the Julian Alps. Ecoscience 2009, 16:48-57.
24. Komonen A., Schroeder L.M., Weslien J. Ips typographus population development after a severe storm in a nature reserve in southern Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 2011, 135:132-141.
25. Kärvemo S., Schroeder L.M. A comparison of outbreak dynamics of the spruce bark beetle in Sweden and the mountain pine beetle (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Canada. Entomol. tidskr. 2010, 131:215-224.
26. Lausch A., Fahse L., Heurich M. Factors affecting the spatio-temporal dispersion of Ips typographus (L.) in Bavarian Forest National Park: a long-term quantitative landscape-level analysis. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2011, 261:233-245.
27. Leathwick J., Elith J., Francis M., Hastie T., Taylor P. Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression trees. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 321:267-281.
28. Lindgren B., Borden J. Displacement and aggregation of mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in response to their antiaggregation and aggregation pheromones. Can. J. Forest Res. 1993, 23:286-290.
29. Lobo J.M., Jiménez-Valverde A., Real R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:145-151.
30. Marini L., Lindelöw Å., Jönsson A.M., Wulff S., Schroeder L.M. Population dynamics of the spruce bark beetle: a long-term study. Oikos 2013, 122:1768-1776.
31. Martin V., Pfeiffer D.U., Zhou X., Xiao X., Prosser D.J., Guo F., Gilbert M. Spatial distribution and risk factors of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in China. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7:e1001308.
32. Negrón J.F., Allen K., Cook B., Withrow Susceptibility of ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa (Dougl. ex Laws.), to mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, attack in uneven-aged stands in the Black Hills of South Dakota and Wyoming USA. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2008, 254:327-334.
33. Negrón J.F., Popp J.B. Probability of ponderosa pine infestation by mountain pine beetle in the Colorado Front Range. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2004, 191:17-27.
34. Netherer S., Nopp-Mayr U. Predisposition assessment systems (PAS) as supportive tools in forest management-rating of site and stand-related hazards of bark beetle infestation in the High Tatra Mountains as an example for system application and verification. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 207:99-107.
35. Overbeck M., Schmidt M. Modelling infestation risk of Norway spruce by Ips typographus (L.) in the Lower Saxon Harz Mountains (Germany). Forest Ecol. Manage. 2012, 266:115-125.
36. Popescu S.C., Wynne R.H., Nelson R.F. Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 29:564-577.
37. Powell J., Kennedy B., White P., Bentz B., Logan J., Roberts D. Mathematical elements of attack risk analysis for mountain pine beetles. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 204:601-620.
38. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
39. Raffa K., Aukema B., Bentz B., Carroll A., Hicke J., Turner M., Romme W. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 2008, 58:501-517.
40. Raffa K., Berryman A. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 1983, 53:27-49.
41. Reese H., Nilsson M., Pahlén T., Hagner O., Joyce S., Tingelöf U., Egberth M., Olsson H. Countrywide estimates of forest variables using satellite data and field data from the national forest inventory. Ambio 2003, 32:542-548.
42. Robertson C., Wulder M., Nelson T., White J. Risk rating for mountain pine beetle infestation of lodgepole pine forests over large areas with ordinal regression modelling. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2008, 256:900-912.
43. Schelhaas M.J., Nabuurs G.J., Schuck A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 2003, 9:1620-1633.
44. Schroeder L., Lindelöw Å. Attacks on living spruce trees by the bark beetle Ips typographus (Col. Scolytidae) following a storm-felling: a comparison between stands with and without removal of wind-felled trees. Agric. For. Entomol. 2002, 4:47-56.
45. Seidl R., Schelhaas M.J., Lexer M.J. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17:2842-2852.
46. Shore, T.L., Safranyik, L., 1992. Susceptibility and risk rating systems for the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands. Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC, Pacific and Yukon Region. Information, Report No. BC-X-336.
47. Sinka M.E., Rubio-Palis Y., Manguin S., Patil A.P., Temperley W.H., Gething P.W., Van Boeckel T., Kabaria C.W., Harbach R.E., Hay S.I. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Americas: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit. Vectors. 2010, 3:72.
48. Stadelmann G., Bugmann H., Wermelinger B., Meier F., Bigler C. A predictive framework to assess spatio-temporal variability of infestations by the European spruce bark beetle. Ecography 2013, 36:1208-1217.
49. Svensson L. Övervakning av insektsangrepp - Slutrapport från Skoggstyrelsens regeringsuppdrag 2007, Skogsstyrelsens förlag, Jönköping, (in Swedish).
50. Van Boeckel T.P., Thanapongtharm W., Robinson T., Biradar C.M., Xiao X., Gilbert M. Improving risk models for avian influenza: the role of intensive poultry farming and flooded land during the 2004 Thailand epidemic. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49528.
51. Wermelinger B. Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus-a review of recent research. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2004, 202:67-82.
52. Wichmann L., Ravn H. The spread of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) attacks following heavy windthrow in Denmark, analysed using GIS. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2001, 148:31-39.
53. Williams D.W., Liebhold A.M. Climate change and the outbreak ranges of two North American bark beetles. Agric. For. Entomol. 2002, 4:87-99.
54. Zhang Q.H., Birgersson G., Zhu J.W., Löfstedt C., Löfqvist J., Schlyter F. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees: variation by tree species, season and temperature, and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25:1923-1943.
55. Zhang Q.H., Schlyter F. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric. For. Entomol. 2004, 6:1-20.