Temporal characteristics of online syntactic sentence planning: An event-related potential study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Timmers, Inge ^a,b   Gentile, Francesco ^a,c   Rubio Gozalbo, M Estela ^b   Jansma, Bernadette M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SIMULATION; SYNTACTIC SENTENCE PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VOLUNTEER; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84893513099     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082884     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Pickering MJ, Garrod S (2013) How tightly are production and comprehension interwoven? Frontiers in psychology 4: 238.
2. Kempen G (2013) Prolegomena to a Neurocomputational Architecture for Human Grammatical Encoding and Decoding. Neuroinformatics.
3. Bock K, Levelt W (1994) Language Production: Grammatical Encoding. In: Gernsbacher MA, editor. Handbook of Psycholinguists. San Diego: Academic Press. 945-984.
4. Bock K (1995) Sentence Production: From Mind to Mouth. In: Miller JL, Eimas PD, editors. Speech, Language, and Communication Handbook of perception and cognition. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press. 181-216.
5. Friederici AD (2011) The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological reviews 91: 1357-1392.
6. Friederici AD (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 78-84.
7. Hagoort P (2005) On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in cognitive sciences 9: 416-423.
8. Vosse TG, Kempen GAM (2008) Parsing Verb-Final Clauses in German : Garden-path and ERP Effects Modeled by a Parallel Dynamic Parser Introduction : Word Order Variation. Cognitive Psychology.
9. Elman JL (2009) On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science 33: 547-582.
10. Gahl S, Yu ACL (2006) Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistic Review 23: 213-216. (Pubitemid 44714128)
11. Tomasello M (2005) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.
12. Langacker RW (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press.
13. Janssen N, Barber Ha (2012) Phrase frequency effects in language production. PloS one 7: e33202.
14. Elman JL (1991) Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure. Machine Learning 7: 195-225.
15. Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Allum PH, Wheeldon LR (2007) Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units. Journal of experimental psychology Learning, memory, and cognition 33: 791-810.
17. Allum PH, Wheeldon L (2009) Scope of Lexical Access in Spoken Sentence Production: Implications for the Conceptual-Syntactic Interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 35: 1240-1255.
18. Wagner V, Jescheniak JD, Schriefers H (2010) On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of experimental psychology Learning, memory, and cognition 36: 423-440.
19. Meyer AS (1996) Lexical access in phrase and sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 477-496.
20. Ferreira F (1991) Effects of Length and Syntactic Complexity Prepared Utterances on initiation Times for. Journal of Memory and Language: 210-233.
21. Bock JK, Irwin DE, Davidson DJ (2004) Putting first things first. In: Henderson JM, Ferreira F, editors. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 249-278.
22. Konopka AE (2012) Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language 66: 143-162.
23. Haller S, Radue EW, Erb M, Grodd W, Kircher T (2005) Overt sentence production in event-related fMRI. Neuropsychologia 43: 807-814. (Pubitemid 40254349)
24. Indefrey P, Brown CM, Hellwig F, Amunts K, Herzog H, et al. (2001) A neural correlate of syntactic encoding during speech production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 5933-5936. (Pubitemid 32435745)
25. Indefrey P, Hellwig F, Herzog H, Seitz RJ, Hagoort P (2004) Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances. Brain and Language 89: 312-319. (Pubitemid 38447178)
26. Menenti L, Gierhan SME, Segaert K, Hagoort P (2011) Shared Language: Overlap and Segregation of the Neuronal Infrastructure for Speaking and Listening Revealed by Functional MRI. Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797611418347.
27. Segaert K, Menenti L, Weber K, Petersson KM, Hagoort P (2011) Shared Syntax in Language Production and Language Comprehension-An fMRI Study. Cerebral cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr249.
28. Hickok G (2009) The functional neuroanatomy of language. Physics of Life Reviews 6: 121-143.
29. Price CJ (2010) The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Cognitive Neuroscience 1191: 62-88.
30. Ganushchak LY, Christoffels IK, Schiller NO (2011) The use of electroencephalography in language production research: a review. Frontiers in psychology 2: 208.
31. van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1997) Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 787-806. (Pubitemid 127543615)
32. van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1998) Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science 280: 572-574. (Pubitemid 28227757)
33. van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1999) The time course of grammatical and phonological processing during speaking: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 649-676.
34. Schmitt BM, Münte TF, Kutas M (2000) Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology 37: 473-484.
35. Schmitt BM, Schiltz K, Zaake W, Kutas M, Münte TF (2001) An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13: 510-522. (Pubitemid 32500258)
36. Schmitt BM, Rodriguez-Fornells A, Kutas M, Münte TF (2001) Electrophysiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening to words. Neuroscience Research 41: 293-298. (Pubitemid 32982895)
37. Rahman RA, van Turennout M, Levelt WJM (2003) Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: An electrophysiological study on object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 29: 850-860. (Pubitemid 37268930)
38. Sahin NT, Pinker S, Cash SS, Schomer D, Halgren E (2009) Sequential Processing of Lexical, Grammatical, and Phonological Information Within Broca's Area. Science 326: 445-449.
39. Marek A, Habets B, Jansma BM, Nager W, Münte TF (2007) Neural correlates of conceptualisation difficulty during the preparation of complex utterances. Aphasiology 21: 1147-1156. (Pubitemid 350200007)
40. Sternberg S (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' method. Attention and Performance II, Acta Psychologica 30: 276-315.
41. Hillyard SA, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Munte TF (1998) Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8: 202-210. (Pubitemid 28247801)
42. Rahman RA, Sommer W (2008) Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15: 1055-1063.
43. Rabovsky M, Sommer W, Rahman RA (2011) Depth of Conceptual Knowledge Modulates Visual Processes during Word Reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience [Epub ahead of print].
44. Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10: 370-375.
45. Makeig S, Onton J (2009) ERP features and EEG dynamics: an ICA perspective. In: Luck SJ, Kappenman E, editors. Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Onton J, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Makeig S (2006) Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent comonent analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30: 808-822. (Pubitemid 44292287)
47. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 134: 9-21.
48. Indefrey P, Levelt WJM (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92: 101-144. (Pubitemid 38270264)
49. Alario F, Costa A, Caramazza A (2002) Language and Cognitive Processes Frequency effects in noun phrase production : Implications for models of lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes 17: 299-319. (Pubitemid 34678844)
50. Schiller NO, Caramazza A (2006) Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and cognitive processes 21: 1011-1029.
51. Bles M, Alinka A, Jansma B (2007) Neural aspects of cohort-size reduction during visual gating. Brain Research 1150: 143-154. (Pubitemid 46702120)
52. Costa A, Strijkers K, Martin C, Thierry G (2009) The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 21442-21446.
53. Strijkers K, Costa A, Thierry G (2009) Tracking Lexical Access in Speech Production: Electrophysiological Correlates of Word Frequency and Cognate Effects. Cerebral Cortex 20: 912-928.
54. Price CJ, Friston KJ (1997) The temporal dynamics of reading: a PET study. Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society 264: 1785-1791. (Pubitemid 28021589)
55. Koester D, Schiller NO (2008) Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. Neuroimage 42: 1622-1630.
56. Coles MGH, Rugg MD (1995) Event-related brain potentials: an introduction. In: Rugg M, Coles M, editors. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. New York, US: Oxford University Press. 1-26.
57. Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38: 557-577.
58. Pickering M, Branigan H (1999) Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in cognitive sciences 3: 136-141. (Pubitemid 29155463)