Comparative proteomics analysis of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced biofuel precursor production

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Tang, Xiaoling ^a   Feng, Huixing ^a   Zhang, Jianhua ^a   Chen, Wei Ning ^a  

^a Nanyang Technological University   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE CITRATE SYNTHASE; BIOFUEL; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ATP CITRATE (PRO-S)-LYASE; BIOFUELS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84893507032     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084661     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Meher LC, Vidya-Sagar D, Naik SN (2006) Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification-A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 10: 248-268. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.002.
2. Thornley P, Rogers J, Huang J (2008) Quantification of employment from biomass power plants. Renew Energ 33: 1922-1927. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.11. 011.
3. Beopoulos A, Nicaud JM, Gaillardin C (2011) An overview of lipid metabolism in yeast and its impact on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90: 1193-1206. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3212-8. PubMed: 21452033.
4. Mao S, Luo Y, Zhang T, Li J, Bao G et al. (2010) Proteome reference map and comparative proteomic analysis between a wild type Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 1731 and its mutant with enhanced butanol tolerance and butanol yield. J Proteome Res 9: 3026-3061. PubMed: 20426490.
5. Sivagnanam K, Raghavan VG, Shah M, Hettich RL, Verberkmoes NC et al. (2011) Comparative shotgun proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum from butanol fermentation using glucose and xylose. Proteome Sci 9: 66-80. doi:10.1186/1477-5956-9-66. PubMed: 22008648.
6. de la Fuente JM, Ramírez-Rodríguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L (1997) Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science 276: 1566-1568. doi:10.1126/science.276.5318.1566. PubMed: 9171061. (Pubitemid 27255321)
7. Tang X, Feng H, Chen WN (2013) Metabolic engineering for enhanced fatty acids synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 16: 95-102. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2013.01.003. PubMed: 23353549.
8. Xu RN, Fan L, Rieser MJ, EI-Shourbagy TA (2007) Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal 44: 342-355. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.02.006. PubMed: 17360141. (Pubitemid 46880094)
9. Guarnieri MT, Nag A, Smolinski SL, Darzins A, Seibert M (2011) Examination of triacylglycerol biosynthetic pathways via de novo transcriptommic and proteomic analyses in an unsequenced microalga. PLOS ONE 6: e25851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025851. PubMed: 22043295.
10. Tolonen AC, Haas W, Chilaka AC, Aach J, Gygi SP et al. (2011) Proteome-wide systems analysis of a cellulosic biofuel-producing microbe. Mol Syst Biol 7: 461-472. PubMed: 21245846.
11. De la Fuente IM, Cortes JM (2012) Quantitative analysis of the effective functional structure in yeast glycolysis. PLOS ONE 7: e30162. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030162. PubMed: 22393350.
12. Wills C (1990) Regulation of sugar and ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 25: 245-280. doi:10.3109/10409239009090611. PubMed: 2171877.
13. Flikweert MT, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (1997) Metabolic responses of pyruvate decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae to glucose excess. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3399-3404. PubMed: 9292991. (Pubitemid 27383129)
14. Lehmann M, Schwarzländer M, Obata T, Sirikantaramas S, Burow M et al. (2009) The metabolic response of Arabidopsis roots to oxidative stress is distinct from that of heterotrophic cells in culture and highlights a complex relationship between the levels of transcripts, metabolites, and flux. Mol Plant 2: 390-406. doi:10.1093/mp/ssn080. PubMed: 19825624.
15. Kostadinova N, Vassilev S, Spasova B, Angelova M (2011) Cold stress in antarctic fungi targets enzymes of the glycolytic pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle. Biotechnol Biotechnol Eq 25: 50-57. doi:10.5504/bbeq.2011.0122.
16. Hönes I (1983) Regulation of glyoxylate cycle enzymes in Saccharomycopsis lipolytica. I. Effect of the carbon source on isocitrate lyase and malate synthase activity. Z Allg Mikrobiol 23: 163-171. doi:10.1002/jobm. 3630230304. PubMed: 6880249.
17. Lee YJ, Jang JW, Kim KJ, Maeng PJ (2011) TCA cycle-independent acetate metabolism via the glyoxylate cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28: 153-166. PubMed: 21246628.
18. Lin AP, Anderson SL, Minard KI, McAlister-Henn L (2011) Effects of excess succinate and retrograde control of metabolite accumulation in yeast tricarboxylic cycle mutants. J Biol Chem 286: 33737-33746. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111. 266890. PubMed: 21841001.
19. Taylor M, Tuffin M, Burton S, Eley K, Cowan D (2008) Microbial responses to solvent and alcohol stress. Biotechnol J 3: 1388-1397
20. Isken S, de Bont JAM (1998) Bacteria tolerant to organic solvents. Extremophiles 2: 229-238. doi:10.1007/s007920050065. PubMed: 9783170. (Pubitemid 28408004)
21. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET (2010) A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng 12: 307-331. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2010.03.004.
22. Dunlop MJ (2011) Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels. Biotechnol Biofuels 4: 32-40. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-4-32. PubMed: 21936941.
23. You KM, Rosenfield CL, Knipple DC (2003) Ethanol tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on cellular oleic acid content. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 1499-1503. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.3.1499-1503.2003. PubMed: 12620835. (Pubitemid 36314287)
24. Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Cabiscol E, Ros J, Matallana E (2010) Reduction of oxidative cellular damage by overexpression of the thioredoxin TRX2 gene improves yield and quality of wine yeast dry active biomass. Microb Cell Fact 11: 31-45. PubMed: 20152017.
25. Iraqui I, Kienda G, Soeur J, Faye G, Baldacci G et al. (2009) Peroxiredoxin Tsa1 is the key peroxidase suppressing genome instability and protecting against cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 5: e1000524. PubMed: 19543365.
26. Luikenhuis S, Perrone G, Dawes IW, Grant CM (1998) The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two glutaredoxin genes that are required for protection against reactive oxygen species. Mol Biol Cell 9: 1081-1091. doi:10.1091/mbc.9.5.1081. PubMed: 9571241. (Pubitemid 28457301)
27. Barton MD, Delneri D, Oliver SG, Rattray M, Bergman CM (2010) Evolutionary systems biology of amino acid biosynthetic cost in yeast. PLOS ONE 5: e11935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011935. PubMed: 20808905.
28. Pahlman AK, Granath K, Ansell R, Hohmann S, Adler L (2001) The yeast glycerol 3-phosphatases gpp1p and gpp2p are required for glycerol biosynthesis and differentially involved in the cellular responses to osmotic, anaerobic, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 276: 3555-3563. doi:10.1074/jbc.M007164200. PubMed: 11058591.
29. Suslu KG, Palabiyik B, Temizkan G (2011) Genes involved in glucose repression and oxidative stress response in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genet Mol Res 10: 4041-4047. doi:10.4238/2011. November.8.4. PubMed: 22095476.
30. Michell RH (2011) Inositol and its derivatives: their evolution and functions. Adv Enzyme Regul 51: 84-90. doi:10.1016/j.advenzreg.2010.10.002. PubMed: 21070803.