Using Formulations and Gaze to Encourage Parents to Talk About Their and Their Children's Health and Well-Being

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 49-68

  Tiitinen, Sanni ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893486498     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2014.871805     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Antaki, C. 2008. " Formulations in psychotherapy ". In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, Edited by: Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. and Leudar, I. 26 - 42. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. InEds.pp
2. Antaki, C. 2012. Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies, 14: 531 - 547.
3. Barnes, R. 2007. " Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk ". In Text & Talk Vol. 27, 273 - 296.
4. Beach, W. A. and Dixson, C. N. 2001. Revealing moments: Formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview. Social Science and Medicine, 52: 25 - 44.
5. Boyd, E. and Heritage, J. 2006. " Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history-taking ". In Communication in medical care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients, Edited by: Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. W. 151 - 184. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. InEds.pp
6. Bredmar, M. and Linell, P. 1999. " Reconfirming normality: The constitution of reassurance in talks between midwives and expectant mothers ". In Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, Edited by: Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. 237 - 270. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. InEds.pp
7. Deppermann, A. and Spranz-Fogasy, T. 2011. Doctors' questions as displays of understanding. Communication & Medicine, 8: 111 - 122.
8. Drew, P. 2003. " Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch ". In Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, Edited by: Glenn, P. J., LeBaron, C. D. and Mandelbaum, J. 293 - 308. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. InEds.pp
9. Goodwin, C. 1979. " The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation ". In Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, Edited by: Psathas, G. 97 - 121. New York, NY: Irvington. InEd.pp
10. Goodwin, C. 1980. Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50: 272 - 302.
11. Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers, New York, NY: Academic Press.
12. Heath, C. 1984. " Talk and recipiency: Sequential organization in speech and body movement ". In Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis, Edited by: Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. 247 - 265. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. InEds.pp
13. Heritage, J. 1985. " Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience ". In Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3: Discourse and dialogue, Edited by: van Dijk, T. A. 95 - 117. London, England: Academic Press. InEd.pp
14. Heritage, J. 2009. " Negotiating the legitimacy of medical problems: A multiphase concern for patients and physicians ". In Communicating to manage health and illness, Edited by: Brashers, D. and Goldsmith, D. 161 - 178. New York, NY: Routledge. InEds.pp
15. Heritage, J. 2010. " Questioning in medicine ". In "Why do you ask?" The function of questions in institutional discourse, Edited by: Freed, A. F. and Ehrlich, S. 42 - 68. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. InEds.pp
16. Heritage, J. and Lindström, A. 1998. Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31: 397 - 438.
17. Heritage, J. and Sefi, S. 1992. " Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers ". In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, Edited by: Drew, P. and Heritage, J. 359 - 417. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. InEds.pp
18. Heritage, J. C. and Watson, D. R. 1979. " Formulations as conversational objects ". In Everyday language. Studies in ethnomethodology, Edited by: Psathas, G. 123 - 162. New York, NY: Irvington. InEd.pp
19. Heritage, J. C. and Watson, D. R. 1980. Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed. Semiotica, 30: 245 - 262.
20. Hutchby, I. 2005. "Active listening": Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38: 303 - 329.
21. Jefferson, G. 1980. On "trouble-premonitory" response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry, 50: 153 - 185.
22. Jefferson, G. 1984. " On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles ". In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, Edited by: Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. 346 - 369. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. InEds.pp
23. Jefferson, G. 1988. On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35: 418 - 441.
24. Koivisto, A.2011Sanomattakin selvää? Ja, mutta ja että puheenvuodon lopussa [Goes without saying? Finnish conjunctions ja, mutta and että in turn-final position]. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-7323-6
25. Koivisto, A. 2012. Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44: 1254 - 1272.
26. Lerner, G. H. 2003. Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32: 177 - 201.
27. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (MSAH). 2004. Lastenneuvola lapsiperheiden tukena. Opas työntekijöille, Helsinki, Finland: Author. [Child health clinics in support of families with children. A guide for staff]
28. Mondada, L. 2006. Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8: 117 - 129.
29. Nishizaka, A. 2010. Self-initiated problem presentation in prenatal checkups: Its placement and construction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43: 283 - 313.
30. Peräkylä, A. 2004. " Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction ". In Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 2nd, Edited by: Silverman, D. 283 - 304. London, England: Sage. InEd.ed., pp
31. Pomerantz, A. 1988. Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55: 360 - 373.
32. Puura, K., Tamminen, T., Mäntymaa, M., Virta, E., Turunen, M.-M. and Koivisto, A.-M. 2001. Lastenneuvolan terveydenhoitaja vauvaperheen tuen tarpeen havaitsijana [The child health nurse as a detector of the support needs of families with baby]. Suomen Lääkärilehti, 56: 4855 - 4861.
33. Robinson, J. D. 1998. Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25: 97 - 123.
34. Robinson, J. D. and Stivers, T. 2001. Achieving activity transitions in physician-patient encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27: 253 - 298.
35. Rossano, F. 2012. Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen.
36. Rossano, F. 2013. " Gaze in conversation ". In The handbook of conversation analysis, Edited by: Sidnell, J. and Stivers, T. 308 - 329. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell. InEds.pp
37. Ruusuvuori, J. 2001. Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52: 1093 - 1108.
38. Ruusuvuori, J. 2005. "Empathy" and "sympathy" in action: Attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68: 204 - 222.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50: 696 - 735.
40. Schegloff, E. A. 1998. Body torque. Social Research, 65: 535 - 596.
41. Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sorjonen, M.-L. 2001. Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
43. Stivers, T. 2007. Prescribing under pressure. Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Stivers, T. and Rossano, F. 2010. Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43: 3 - 31.
45. Stivers, T. and Sidnell, J. 2005. Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156: 1 - 20.
46. Tiitinen, S. and Ruusuvuori, J. 2012. Engaging parents through gaze: Speaker selection in three-party interactions in maternity clinics. Patient Education and Counseling, 89: 38 - 43.
47. VISK = Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi [Extensive Finnish grammar]. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Retrieved from http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk
48. Weiste, E. and Peräkylä, A. 2013. A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46: 299 - 321.