Mobilizing response

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-31

  Stivers, Tanya ^a   Rossano, Federico ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649127772     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351810903471258     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52, 566-580.
2. Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23, 562-588.
3. Bertinetto, P. M., & Caldognetto, E. (1993). Ritmo e intonazione. In A. A. Sobrero (Ed.), Introduzione all' Italiano contemporaneo [Introduction to contemporary Italian] (pp. 141-192). Bari, Italy: Laterza.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bussman, H. (1996). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Routledge.
6. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (in press.) Some truths and untruths about prosody in English question and answer sequences In J. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Curl, T. S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1257-1280.
8. Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 129-153.
9. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. Drew, P. (1997). "Open" class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69-101.
11. Dryer, M. S. (2008). Polar questions. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Available from http://wals.info
12. Duncan, S. Jr., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Ford, C.E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S.A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, B.A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14-38). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15. Golato, A. (2002). German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 547-571.
16. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, 205-217.
17. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 1-52.
18. Haan, J. (2002). Speaking of questions: An exploration of Dutch question intonation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
19. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
21. Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson, (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 196-224). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15-38.
23. Heritage, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 1-60.
24. Jefferson, G. (1981). The abominable "ne?": A working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response (Occasional Paper No.6). Manchester, England: University of Manchester, Department of Sociology.
25. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-441.
26. Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22-63.
27. Kori, S., & Farnetani, E. (1983). Acoustic manifestation of focus in Italian. Quaderni del Centro di Studio per le Ricerche di Fonetica, 2, 323-328.
28. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
29. Ladd, D. R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
30. Lerner, G. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177-201.
31. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
33. Pomerantz, A. (1978a). Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology, 12, 115-121.
34. Pomerantz, A. (1978b). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
35. Pomerantz, A. (1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Pomerantz, A. (1984b). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 152-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Pomerantz, A. M. (1980). Telling my side: "Limited access" as a "fishing" device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186-198.
38. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London, England: Longman.
39. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
40. Rossano, F. (2005, July). When it's over is it really over? On the effects of sustained gaze vs. gaze withdrawal at sequence possible completion. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association, Riva del Garda, Italy.
41. Rossano, F. (2006, May). When the eyes meet: Using gaze to mobilize response. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Helsinki, Finland.
42. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
43. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
44. Sadock, J., & Zwicky, A. (1985). Speech act distinctions in syntax. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 1, pp. 155-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
46. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 28-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185-211.
48. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A primer for conversation analysis: Sequence organization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
50. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
51. Searle, J.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P.Cole&J. L.Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59-82).NewYork, NY: Academic Press.
52. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T.,. Yoon, K.-E. (2009). Universality and cultural specificity in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 10587-10592.
53. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367-392.