Pre- and post-stimulus EEG patterns associated with the touch-induced illusory flash

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 562, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-84

  Van Erp, Jan B F ^a   Philippi, Tom G ^a,b   de Winkel, Ksander N ^a,b   Werkhoven, Peter ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alpha; EEG; Illusion; Illusory flash; Multisensory; Pre stimulus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETO-OCCIPITAL SULCUS; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; TOUCH; VEIN; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

ALPHA; EEG; ILLUSION; ILLUSORY FLASH; MULTISENSORY; PRE-STIMULUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SOUND; TOUCH; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893480098     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Benoit M.M., Raij T., Lin F.-H., Jääskeläinen I.P., Stufflebeam S. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts. Human Brain Mapping 2010, 31(4):526-538.
2. Bhattacharya J., Shams L., Shimojo S. Sound-induced illusory flash perception: role of gamma band responses. Neuroreport 2002, 13(4):1727-1730.
3. Bresciani J.-P., Dammeier F., Ernst M.O. Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision 2006, 554-564.
4. Dugué L., Marque P., VanRullen R. The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(33):11889-11893.
5. Goldstone S. Variability of temporal judgment: intersensory comparisons and sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1968, 26(1):211-215.
6. Haig A.R., Gordon E. Prestimulus EEG alpha phase synchronicity influences N100 amplitude and reaction time. Psychophysiology 1998, 35(5):591-595.
7. Hanslmayr S., Aslan A., Staudigl T., Klimesch W., Herrmann C.S., Bäuml K.-H. Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects. NeuroImage 2007, 37(4):1465-1473.
8. Jacobs C., de Graaf T.A., Goebel R., Sack A.T. The temporal dynamics of early visual cortex involvement in behavioral priming. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(11):e48808.
9. Jacobs C., Goebel R., Sack A.T. Visual awareness suppression by pre-stimulus brain stimulation; a neural effect. NeuroImage 2012, 59(1):616-624.
10. Keil J., Müller N., Ihssen N., Weisz N. On the variability of the McGurk effect: audiovisual integration depends on prestimulus brain states. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22(1):221-231.
11. Linkenkaer-Hansen K., Nikulin V.V., Palva S., Ilmoniemi R.J., Palva J.M. Prestimulus oscillations enhance psychophysical performance in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(45):10186-10190.
12. Mathewson K.E., Gratton G., Fabiani M., Beck D.M., Ro T. To see or not to see: prestimulus α phase predicts visual awareness. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(9):2725-2732.
13. Mishra J., Martinez A., Hillyard S.A. Cortical processes underlying sound-induced flash fusion. Brain Research 2008, 1242:102-115.
14. Mishra J., Martinez A., Sejnowski T.J., Hillyard S.A. Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(15):4120-4131.
15. Philippi T.G., Van Erp J.B.F., Werkhoven P.J. Multisensory temporal numerosity judgment. Brain Research 2008, 1242(C):116-125.
16. Scheeringa R., Mazaheri A., Bojak I., Norris D.G., Kleinschmidt A. Modulation of visually evoked cortical fMRI responses by phase of ongoing occipital alpha oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(10):3813-3820.
17. Shams L., Iwaki S., Chawla A., Bhattacharya J. Early modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 378:76-81.
18. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Shimojo S. What you see is what you hear. Nature 2000, 408:788.
19. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Shimojo S. Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14:147-152.
20. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Thompson S., Shimojo S. Sound alters visual evoked potential in humans. Neuroreport 2001, 12(4):3849-3852.
21. Taylor P.C.J., Thut G. Brain activity underlying visual perception and attention as inferred from TMS-EEG: a review. Brain Stimulation 2012, 5(2):124-129.
22. Teder-Sälejärvi W.A., McDonald J.J., Di Russo F., Hillyard S.A. An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14:106-114.
23. Van Dijk H., Schoffelen J.-M., Oostenveld R., Jensen O. Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(8):1816-1823.
24. Van Erp J.B.F., Philippi T.G., Werkhoven P. Observers can reliably identify illusory flashes in the illusory flash paradigm. Experimental Brain Research 2013, 226(1):73-79.
25. Van Erp J.B.F., Verschoor M.H. Cross-modal visual and vibrotactile tracking. Applied Ergonomics 2004, 35(2):105-112.
26. Van Erp J.B.F., Werkhoven P.J. Vibro-tactile and visual asynchronies: sensitivity and consistency. Perception 2004, 33(1):103-112.
27. Violentyev A., Shimojo S., Shams L. Touch-induced visual illusion. Neuroreport 2005, 16(10):1107-1110.
28. Watkins S., Shams L., Tanaka S., Haynes J.-D., Rees G. Sound alters activity in human V1 in association with illusory visual perception. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1247-1256.
29. Werkhoven P.J., Van Erp J.B.F., Philippi T.G. Counting visual and tactile events: the effect of attention on multisensory integration, attention. Perception and Psychophysics 2009, 71(8):1854-1861.